Segmentation of building facades using procedural shape priors

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3105-3112

  Teboul, Olivier ^a,b   Simon, Loïc ^a   Koutsourakis, Panagiotis ^a,c   Paragios, Nikos ^a,d  

^a Ecole Centrale de Paris   (France)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^d INRIA SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING FACADES; COMPLEX ARCHITECTURES; DERIVATION RULES; GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION; GROUND TRUTH; OBSERVATION SPACE; PHOTOMETRIC VARIATIONS; PROBABILISTIC INTERPRETATION; PROCEDURAL GENERATIONS; PROCEDURAL MODELING; RANDOM WALK; SHAPE GRAMMARS; SHAPE PRIORS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; VISUAL CLASSIFICATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

FACADES;

EID: 77955988497     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5540068     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. F. Alegre and F. Dellaert. A probabilistic approach to the semantic interpretation of building facades. International Workshop on Vision Techniques Applied to the Rehabilitation of City Centres, 2004. 2
2. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5-32, 2001. 4
3. D. Comaniciu and P. Meer. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Tr. PAMI, 24(5):603-619, 2002. 1
4. T. Cootes. Active shape models. In BMVC, pages 266-275. Springer-Verlag, 1992. 1
5. T. F. Cootes, G. J. Edwards, and C. J. Taylor. Active appearance models. IEEE Tr. PAMI, 23:681-685, 1998. 1
6. S. Essafi, G. Langs, and N. Paragios. Hierarchical 3d diffusion wavelets shape priors. In ICCV, 2009. 1
7. J. Gips. Shape Grammars and Their Uses. Birkhäuser, 1975. 1, 2
8. R. Hartley and A. Zisserman. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, second edition, 2003. 6
9. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. IJCV, 1(4):321-331, 1988. 1
10. V. Kolmogorov and R. Zabih. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? IEEE Tr. PAMI, 26(2):147-159, 2004. 1
11. P. Koutsourakis, L. Simon, O. Teboul, G. Tziritas, and N. Paragios. Single view reconstruction using shape grammars for urban environments. In ICCV, 2009. 2
12. V. Lepetit and P. Fua. Keypoint recognition using randomized trees. IEEE Tr. PAMI, 28(9):1465-1479, 2006. 4, 5
13. P. Müller, P. Wonka, S. Haegler, A. Ulmer, and L. J. V. Gool. Procedural modeling of buildings. ACM Tr. Graph., 25(3):614-623, 2006. 1
14. P. Müller, G. Zeng, P. Wonka, and L. J. V. Gool. Image-based procedural modeling of facades. ACM Tr. Graph., 26(3):85, 2007. 1
15. D. Nain, S. Haker, A. Bobick, and A. Tannenbaum. Multi-scale 3d shape representation and segmentation using spherical wavelets. TMI, 26(4):598-618, 2007. 1
16. S. Osher and N. Paragios. Level Set Methods in Imaging, Vision and Graphics. Springer, 2003. 1
17. Y. I. H. Parish and P. Müller. Procedural modeling of cities. In SIGGRAPH, pages 301-308, 2001. 1
18. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Tr. PAMI, 22:888-905, 1997. 1
19. J. Shotton, M. Johnson, and R. Cipolla. Semantic texton forests for image categorization and segmentation. In CVPR, 2008. 4
20. G. Stiny. Pictorial and Formal Aspects of Shape and Shape Grammars. PhD thesis, Birkhäuser, 1975. 1, 2
21. J. M. Winn and J. Shotton. The layout consistent random field for recognizing and segmenting partially occluded objects. In CVPR, pages 37-44, 2006. 4