Multi-domain, higher order level set scheme for 3D image segmentation on the GPU

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2211-2216

  Sharma, Ojaswa ^a   Zhang, Qin ^b   Anton, François ^a   Bajaj, Chandrajit ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D IMAGE SEGMENTATION; COMPUTATIONAL BURDEN; GEOMETRICAL SHAPES; HIGHER ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER METHODS; LEVEL SET; LEVEL SET METHOD; LEVEL-SET EVOLUTION; LINEAR INTERPOLATION; MEMORY USAGE; MULTI DOMAINS; VOLUMETRIC IMAGES;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER VISION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 77955986869     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539902     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. C. Bajaj, G. Xu, and Q. Zhang. A Higher Order Level Set Method with Applications to Smooth Surface Constructions. ICES Report 06-18. Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2006.
2. C. Bajaj, G. Xu, and Q. Zhang. A fast variational method for the construction of resolution adaptive C2-smooth molecular surfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198(21-26):1684-1690, 2009.
3. G. E. Blelloch. Prefix sums and their applications. Technical Report CMU-CS-90-190, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Nov. 1990.
4. G. Borgefors. Distance transformations in digital images. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 34(3):344-371, 1986.
5. T. F. Chan and L. A. Vese. A level set algorithm for minimizing the Mumford-Shah functional in image processing. In IEEE Workshop on Variational and Level Set Methods, pages 161-168, 2001.
6. M. Harris, S. Sengupta, and J. Owens. Parallel prefix sum (scan) with CUDA. GPU Gems, 3, 2007.
7. A. Lefohn, J. Kniss, C. Hansen, and R. Whitaker. A streaming narrow-band algorithm: interactive computation and visualization of level sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10(4):422-433, 2004.
8. S. Osher and R. P. Fedkiw. Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces. Springer, 2003.
9. G. Papandreou and P. Maragos. Multigrid geometric active contour models. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(1):229, 2007.
10. L. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D, 60:259-268, 1992.
11. O. Sharma and F. Anton. CUDA based Level Set Method for 3D Reconstruction of Fishes from Large Acoustic Data. In International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision 17, 2009.
12. R. Strzodka and M. Rumpf. Level set segmentation in graphics hardware. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP-2001), pages 1103-1106.
13. UT-CVC. Volume Rover, 2006. http://cvcweb.ices.utexas.edu/cvc/projects/ project.php?proID=9.
14. L. A. Vese and T. F. Chan. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(3):271-293, 2002.
15. J.Weickert, B. Romeny, M. Viergever, et al. Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(3):398-410, 1998.