메뉴 건너뛰기
Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library
Volumn 18, Issue , 2004, Pages 225-247
THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE’S JURISPRUDENCE ON ARTICLE 26 – A PYRRHIC VICTORY?

(1)  Tomuschat, Christian a  

a NONE
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

EID: 77955971333     PISSN: 13883208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789047406259_019     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (2)
References (57)
  • 1
    • 85178880417 scopus 로고
    • Broeks The Netherlands), Views adopted on 9 April UN doc. A/42/40
    • Case No.172/1984 (Broeks v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 9 April 1987, UN doc. A/42/40, p. 139.
    • (1987) Case No.172/1984 , pp. 139
  • 2
    • 85178954556 scopus 로고
    • Danning The Netherlands), Views adopted 9 April UN doc. A/42/40
    • Case No. 180/1984 (Danning v. The Netherlands), Views adopted 9 April 1987, UN doc. A/42/40, p. 151.
    • (1987) Case No. 180/1984 , pp. 151
  • 3
    • 85178932590 scopus 로고
    • The Netherlands), Views adopted on 9 April UN doc. A/42/40
    • Case No. 182/1984 (Zwaan-de Vries v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 9 April 1987, UN doc. A/42/40, p. 160.
    • (1987) Case No. 182/1984 (Zwaan-de Vries v. , pp. 160
  • 4
    • 85178940692 scopus 로고
    • C. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 24 March UN doc. A/43/40
    • Case No. 212/1986 (P.P.C. v. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 24 March 1988, UN doc. A/43/40, p. 244.
    • (1988) Case No. 212/1986 , pp. 244
  • 5
    • 85178953694 scopus 로고
    • Blom Sweden), Views adopted on 4 April UN doc. A/43/40
    • Case No. 191/1985 (Blom v. Sweden), Views adopted on 4 April 1988, UN doc. A/43/40, p. 211.
    • (1988) Case No. 191/1985 , pp. 211
  • 6
    • 85178874357 scopus 로고
    • Vos The Netherlands), Views adopted on 29 March UN doc. A/44/40
    • Case No. 218/1986 (Vos v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 29 March 1989, UN doc. A/44/40, p. 232.
    • (1989) Case No. 218/1986 , pp. 232
  • 7
    • 85178915674 scopus 로고
    • B. d. B. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 30 March UN doc. A/44/40
    • Case No. 273/1989 (B. d. B. v. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 30 March 1989, UN doc. A/44/40, p. 286.
    • (1989) Case No. 273/1989 , pp. 286
  • 8
    • 85178938945 scopus 로고
    • 196/1985 (Gueye et al. France), Views adopted 3 April UN doc. A/44/40
    • Case No. 196/1985 (Gueye et al. v. France), Views adopted 3 April 1989, UN doc. A/44/40, p. 189.
    • (1989) Case No , pp. 189
  • 9
    • 85178926047 scopus 로고
    • Singh Bhinder Canada), Views adopted on 9 November UN doc. A/45/40
    • Case No. 208/1986 (Singh Bhinder v. Canada), Views adopted on 9 November 1989, UN doc. A/45/40 Vol. II, p. 50.
    • (1989) Case No. 208/1986 , vol.2 , pp. 50
  • 10
    • 85178873240 scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 25 July UN doc. A/45/40
    • Case No. 219/1986 (Guesdon v. France), Views adopted on 25 July 1990, UN doc. A/45/40 Vol. II, p. 61.
    • (1990) Case No. 219/1986 (Guesdon v. France) , vol.2 , pp. 61
  • 11
    • 85178947304 scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 25 July UN doc. A/45/40
    • Case No. 295/1988 (Järvinen v. Finland), Views adopted on 25 July 1990, UN doc. A/45/40 Vol. II, p. 101.
    • (1990) Case No. 295/1988 (Järvinen v. Finland) , vol.2 , pp. 101
  • 12
    • 85178891005 scopus 로고
    • Lindgren and others Sweden), Views adopted on 9 November UN doc. A/46/40
    • Cases Nos. 298/1988 and 299/1988, (Lindgren and others v. Sweden), Views adopted on 9 November 1990, UN doc. A/46/40, p. 264.
    • (1990) Cases Nos. 298/1988 and 299/1988 , pp. 264
  • 13
    • 85178919235 scopus 로고
    • 1988, (Cadoret and Le Bihan France), Views adopted on 11 April UN doc. A/46/40
    • Cases Nos. 221/1987 and 323/1988, (Cadoret and Le Bihan v. France), Views adopted on 11 April 1991, UN doc. A/46/40, p. 223.
    • (1991) Cases Nos. 221/1987 and , pp. 223
  • 14
    • 85178893013 scopus 로고
    • Barzhig France), Views adopted on 11 April UN doc. A/46/40
    • Case No. 327/1988 (Barzhig v. France), Views adopted on 11 April 1991, UN doc. A/46/40, p. 272.
    • (1991) Case No. 327/1988 , pp. 272
  • 15
    • 85178909365 scopus 로고
    • Pauger Austria), Views adopted on 26 March UN doc. A/47/40
    • Case No. 415/1990 (Pauger v. Austria), Views adopted on 26 March 1992, UN doc. A/47/40, p. 322.
    • (1992) Case No. 415/1990 , pp. 322
  • 16
    • 85178915514 scopus 로고
    • Sprenger The Netherlands), Views adopted on 31 March UN doc. A/47/40
    • Case No. 395/1990 (Sprenger v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 31 March 1992, UN doc. A/47/40, p. 308.
    • (1992) Case No. 395/1990 , pp. 308
  • 17
    • 85178873174 scopus 로고
    • Oulajin and Kaiss The Netherlands), Views adopted on 23 October UN doc. A/48/40
    • Cases Nos. 406/1990 and 426/1990 (Oulajin and Kaiss v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 23 October 1992, UN doc. A/48/40 Vol. II, p. 131.
    • (1992) Cases Nos. 406/1990 and 426/1990 , vol.2 , pp. 131
  • 18
    • 85178878404 scopus 로고
    • L.- d. M. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 26 July UN doc. A/48/40
    • Case No. 478/1991 (L.-v. d. M. v. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 26 July 1993, UN doc. A/48/40 Vol. II, p. 217.
    • (1993) Case No. 478/1991 , vol.2 , pp. 217
  • 19
    • 85178894999 scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 27 July UN doc. A/48/40
    • Case No. 402/1990 (Brinkhof v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 27 July 1993, UN doc. A/48/40 Vol. II, p. 124.
    • (1993) Case No. 402/1990 (Brinkhof v. The Netherlands , vol.2 , pp. 124
  • 21
    • 85178947184 scopus 로고
    • Australia), Views adopted on 31 March UN doc. A/49/40
    • Case No. 488/1992 (Toonen v. Australia), Views adopted on 31 March 1994, UN doc. A/49/40, Vol.II, p. 226.
    • (1994) Case No. 488/1992 (Toonen v. , vol.2 , pp. 226
  • 22
    • 85178943562 scopus 로고
    • B.-R. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 7 April UN doc. A/49/40
    • Case No. 477/1991 (B.-R. v. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 7 April 1994, UN doc. A/49/40 Vol. II, p. 294.
    • (1994) Case No. 477/1991 , vol.2 , pp. 294
  • 23
    • 85178942766 scopus 로고
    • Netherlands), Views adopted on 15 July UN doc. A/49/40
    • Case No. 425/1990 (Doesburg Lannooij Neefs v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 15 July 1994, UN doc. A/49/40 Vol. II, p. 120.
    • (1994) Case No. 425/1990 (Doesburg Lannooij Neefs v. The , vol.2 , pp. 120
  • 24
    • 85178877302 scopus 로고
    • Pepels The Netherlands), Views adopted on 15 July UN doc. A/49/40
    • Case No. 484/1991 (Pepels v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 15 July 1994, UN doc. A/49/40 Vol. II, p. 221.
    • (1994) Case No. 484/1991 , vol.2 , pp. 221
  • 25
    • 85178906618 scopus 로고
    • The Netherlands), Views adopted on 3 April UN doc. A/50/40
    • Case No. 500/1992 (Debreczeny v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 3 April 1995, UN doc. A/50/40, p. 59.
    • (1995) Case No. 500/1992 (Debreczeny v. , pp. 59
  • 26
    • 85178920771 scopus 로고
    • Simunek The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 19 July UN doc. A/50/40
    • Case No. 516/1992 (Simunek v. The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 19 July 1995, UN doc. A/50/40 Vol. II, p. 89.
    • (1995) Case No. 516/1992 , vol.2 , pp. 89
  • 27
    • 85178898764 scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 30 October UN doc. A/51/40
    • Case No. 454/1991 (García Pons v. Spain), Views adopted on 30 October 1995, UN doc. A/51/40 Vol. II, p. 30.
    • (1995) Case No. 454/1991 (García Pons v. Spain) , vol.2 , pp. 30
  • 28
    • 85178925196 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nahlik Austria, Decision adopted on 22 July UN doc. A/51/40
    • Case No. 608/1995, Nahlik v. Austria, Decision adopted on 22 July 1996, UN doc. A/51/40 Vol. II, p. 259.
    • (1996) Case No. 608/1995 , vol.2 , pp. 259
  • 29
    • 85178941677 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 23 July UN doc. A/51/40
    • Case No. 566/1993 (Somers v. Hungary), Views adopted on 23 July 1996, UN doc. A/51/40 Vol. II, p. 144.
    • (1996) Case No. 566/1993 (Somers v. Hungary) , vol.2 , pp. 144
  • 30
    • 85178905991 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 23 July UN doc. A/51/40
    • Case No. 586/1994 (Adam v. The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 23 July 1996, UN doc. A/51/40 Vol. II, p. 165.
    • (1996) Case No. 586/1994 (Adam v. The Czech Republic) , vol.2 , pp. 165
  • 31
    • 85178911063 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision adopted on 3 April UN doc. A/52/40
    • Case No. 601/1994 (Drake v. New Zealand), Decision adopted on 3 April 1997, UN doc. A/52/40 Vol. II, p. 273.
    • (1997) Case No. 601/1994 (Drake v. New Zealand , vol.2 , pp. 273
  • 32
    • 85178920533 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision adopted on 14 July UN doc. A/52/40
    • Case No. 643/1994 (Drobek v. Slovakia), Decision adopted on 14 July 1997, UN doc. A/52/40 Vol. II, p. 300.
    • (1997) Case No. 643/1994 (Drobek v. Slovakia , vol.2 , pp. 300
  • 33
    • 85178881022 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • van Oord The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 23 July UN doc. A/52/40
    • Case No. 658/1995 (van Oord v. The Netherlands), Decision adopted on 23 July 1997, UN doc. A/52/40 Vol. II, p. 311.
    • (1997) Case No. 658/1995 , vol.2 , pp. 311
  • 34
    • 85178919365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kalaba Hungary), Decision adopted on 7 November UN doc. A/53/40
    • Case No. 735/1997 (Kalaba v. Hungary), Decision adopted on 7 November 1997, UN doc. A/53/40 Vol. II, p. 263.
    • (1997) Case No. 735/1997 , vol.2 , pp. 263
  • 35
    • 85178931365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Snijders et al. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 27 July UN doc. A/53/40
    • Case No. 651/1998 (Snijders et al. v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 27 July 1998, UN doc. A/53/40, Vol. II, p. 135.
    • (1998) Case No. 651/1998 , vol.2 , pp. 135
  • 36
    • 85178937235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Malik The Czech Republic), Decision adopted on 21 October UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 669/1995 (Malik v. The Czech Republic), Decision adopted on 21 October 1998, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 294.
    • (1998) Case No. 669/1995 , vol.2 , pp. 294
  • 37
    • 85178946301 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision adopted on 21 October UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 670/1995 (Schlosser v. The Czech Republic), Decision adopted on 21 October 1998, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 298.
    • (1998) Case No. 670/1995 (Schlosser v. The Czech Republic) , vol.2 , pp. 298
  • 38
    • 85178954581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 3 November UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 602/1994 (Hoofdman v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 3 November 1998, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 36.
    • (1998) Case No. 602/1994 (Hoofdman v. The Netherlands) , vol.2 , pp. 36
  • 39
    • 85178876652 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision adopted on 25 March UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 742/1997 (Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada), Decision adopted on 25 March 1999, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 354.
    • (1999) Case No. 742/1997 (Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada) , vol.2 , pp. 354
  • 40
    • 85178914153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pauger Austria), Views adopted on 25 March UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 716/1999 (Pauger v. Austria), Views adopted on 25 March 1999, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 202.
    • (1999) Case No. 716/1999 , vol.2 , pp. 202
  • 41
    • 85178878605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Vos The Netherlands), Views adopted on 26 July UN doc. A/54/40
    • Case No. 786/1997 (Vos v. The Netherlands), Views adopted on 26 July 1999, UN doc. A/54/40, Vol. II, p. 271.
    • (1999) Case No. 786/1997 , vol.2 , pp. 271
  • 42
    • 85178883454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Foin France), Views adopted on 3 November UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 666/1995 (Foin v. France), Views adopted on 3 November 1999, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 30.
    • (1999) Case No. 666/1995 , vol.2 , pp. 30
  • 43
    • 85178937553 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Waldman Canada), Views adopted on 3 November UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 694/1996 (Waldman v. Canada), Views adopted on 3 November 1999, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 86.
    • (1999) Case No. 694/1996 , vol.2 , pp. 86
  • 44
    • 85178885045 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • France), Decision adopted on 3 November UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 861/1999 (Lestourneaud v. France), Decision adopted on 3 November 1999, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 234.
    • (1999) Case No. 861/1999 (Lestourneaud v. , vol.2 , pp. 234
  • 45
    • 85178915278 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Doukouré France), Views adopted on 29 March UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 756/1997 (Doukouré v. France), Views adopted on 29 March 2000, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 194.
    • (2000) Case No. 756/1997 , vol.2 , pp. 194
  • 46
    • 85178887169 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maille France), Views adopted on 10 July UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 689/1996 (Maille v. France), Views adopted on 10 July 2000, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 62.
    • (2000) Case No. 689/1996 , vol.2 , pp. 62
  • 47
    • 85178922225 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Venier & Nicolas France), Views adopted on 10 July UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case Nos. 690/1996 and 691/1996 (Venier & Nicolas v. France), Views adopted on 10 July 2000, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 75.
    • (2000) Case Nos. 690/1996 and 691/1996 , vol.2 , pp. 75
  • 48
    • 85178878589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • G. Canada), Decision adopted on 17 July UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 934/2000 (G. v. Canada), Decision adopted on 17 July 2000, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 251.
    • (2000) Case No. 934/2000 , vol.2 , pp. 251
  • 49
    • 85178938241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Diergaardt et al. Namibia), Views adopted on 25 July UN doc. A/55/40
    • Case No. 760/1997 (Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia), Views adopted on 25 July 2000, UN doc. A/55/40, Vol. II, p. 140.
    • (2000) Case No. 760/1997 , vol.2 , pp. 140
  • 50
    • 85178901797 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kavanagh Ireland), Views adopted on 4 April UN doc. A/56/40
    • Case No. 819/1998 (Kavanagh v. Ireland), Views adopted on 4 April 2001, UN doc. A/56/40, Vol. II, p. 122.
    • (2001) Case No. 819/1998 , vol.2 , pp. 122
  • 51
    • 85178887680 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Case 857/1999 Blazek et al.. Views adopted on 12 July UN doc. A/56/40
    • Case No. 857/1999 (Blazek et al. v. The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 12 July 2001, UN doc. A/56/40, Vol. II, p. 168.
    • (2001) The Czech Republic) , vol.2 , pp. 168
  • 53
    • 85178913961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Views adopted on 24 July UN doc. A/56/40
    • Case No. 790/1997 (Cheban v. Russian Federation), Views adopted on 24 July 2001, UN doc. A/56/40, Vol. II, p. 88.
    • (2001) Case No. 790/1997 (Cheban v. Russian Federation , vol.2 , pp. 88
  • 56
    • 85178872811 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Brok The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 31 October UN doc. A/57/40
    • Case No. 774/1997 (Brok v. The Czech Republic), Views adopted on 31 October 2001, UN doc. A/57/40, Vol. II, p.110.
    • (2001) Case No. 774/1997 , vol.2 , pp. 110
  • 57
    • 85178967408 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marín Gómez Spain), Views adopted on 5 November UN doc. A/57/40
    • Case No. 865/1999 (Marín Gómez v. Spain), Views adopted on 5 November 2001, UN doc. A/57/40, Vol. II, p.198.
    • (2001) Case No. 865/1999 , vol.2 , pp. 198

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.