Sexual conflict in wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1989-1997

  Abbott, J K ^a,b   Bedhomme, S ^a,c   Chippindale, A K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; Experimental evolution; Geometric morphometrics; Intralocus sexual conflict; Ontogenetic sexual conflict; Sexual size dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BODY SIZE; CHROMOSOME; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; MORPHOMETRY; ONTOGENY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION; SHAPE; WING MORPHOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY SIZE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; WING;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 77955967980     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02064.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bedhomme S, Prasad NG, Jiang P-P, Chippindale AK. Reproductive behavior evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2187.
2. Blanckenhorn WU, Dixon AFG, Fairbairn DJ, Foellmer MW, Gibert P, van der Linde K, Meier R, Nylin S, Pitnick S, Schoff C, Signorelli M, Teder T, Wiklund C. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time? Am. Nat. 2007, 169:245-257.
3. Bonduriansky R. Condition dependence of developmental stability in the sexually dimorphic fly Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae). J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:861-872.
4. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:280-288.
5. Breuker CJ, Patterson JS, Klingenberg CP. A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS ONE 2006, 1:7.
6. Breuker CJ, Brakefield PM, Gibbs M. The association between wing morphology and dispersal is sex-specific in the glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2007, 104:445-452.
7. Chippindale AK, Ngo AL, Rose MR. The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development. J. Genet. 2003, 82:133-145.
8. Clarke GM. The genetic basis of developmental stability. IV. Individual and population asymmetry parameters. Heredity 1998, 80:553-561.
9. Cowley DE, Atchley WR. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between sexes for head and thorax traits. Genetics 1988, 119:421-433.
10. Cowley DE, Atchley WR, Rutledge JJ. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sexual dimorphism in genetic parameters for wing traits. Genetics 1986, 114:549-566.
11. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:176-187.
12. Davis AK, Grosse AM. Measuring fluctuating asymmetry in plastron scutes of yellow-bellied sliders: the importance of gender, size and body location. Am. Midl. Nat. 2008, 159:340-348.
13. Fraser HB, Schadt EE. The quantitative genetics of phenotypic robustness. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8635.
14. Frazier MR, Harrison JF, Kirkton SD, Roberts SP. Cold-rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211:2116-2122.
15. Gidaszewski NA, Baylac M, Klingenberg CP. Evolution of sexual diimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:110.
16. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB. Plastic and genetic variation in wing loading as a function of temperature within and among parallel clines in Drosophila subobscura. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2004, 44:461-470.
17. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Serra L. Rapid evolution of wing size clines in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 2001, 112-113:273-286.
18. Hansen TF, Carter AJR, Pélabon C. On adaptive accuracy and precision in natural populations. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:168-181.
19. Houle D. High enthusiasm and low r-squared. Evolution 1998, 52:1872-1876.
20. James AC, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L. Cellular basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1995, 140:659-666.
21. Karan D, Morin J-P, Gravot E, Moreteau B, David JR. Body size reaction norms in Drosophila melanogaster: temporal stability and genetic architecture in a natural population. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1999, 31:491-508.
22. Karan D, Morin J-P, Gibert P, Moreteau B, Scheiner SM, David JR. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. IX. Genetic architecture, temperature, and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 2000, 54:1035-1040.
23. Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 1998, 52:1363-1375.
24. Long TAF, Rice WR. Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 274:3105-3112.
25. Maklakov AA, Bilde T, Lubin Y. Sexual selection for increased male body size and protandry in a spider. Anim. Behav. 2004, 68:1041-1048.
26. Markow TA, Ricker JP. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Heredity 1992, 69:122-127.
27. Mezey JG, Houle D. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 2005, 59:1027-1038.
28. Miller GT, Pitnick S. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 2003, 298:1230-1233.
29. Møller AP, Thornhill R. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 1998, 151:174-192.
30. Morrow EH, Stewart AD, Rice WR. Assessing the extent of genome-wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender-limited selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1046-1054.
31. Moya-Loraño J, Halaj J, Wise DH. Climbing to reach females: Romeo should be small. Evolution 2002, 56:420-425.
32. Palmer AR. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications 1994, 335-364. Markow TA. ed, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
33. Palmer AR, Strobeck C. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses revisited. Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences 2002, 279-319. Polak M, ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
34. Parisi M, Nuttall R, Naiman D, Bouffard G, Malley J, Andrews J, Eastman S, Oliver B. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 2003, 299:697-700.
35. Parsons PA. Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity 1992, 68:361-368.
36. Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V. Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 1994, 48:1269-1276.
37. Poissant J, Wilson AJ, Coltman DW. Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 2009, 64:97-107.
38. Powell AM, Davis M, Powell JR. Phenotypic plasticity across 50 MY of evolution: drosophila wing size and temperature. J. Insect Physiol. 2010, 56:380-382.
39. Prasad NG, Bedhomme S, Day T, Chippindale AK. An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited expression. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:29-37.
40. Reeve HK, Fairbairn DJ. Sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on body size: an empirical test of the quantitative genetic model. Evolution 1996, 50:1927-1938.
41. Rice WR. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 1984, 38:735-742.
42. Rice WR. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 1996, 381:232-234.
43. Santos M, Brites D, Laayouni H. Thermal evolution of pre-adult life history traits, geometic size and shape, and developmental stability in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:2006-2021.
44. Schluter D. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 1996, 50:1766-1774.
45. Söderman F, van Dongen S, Pakkasmaa S, Merilä J. Environmental stress increases skeletal fluctuating asymmetry in the moor frog Rana arvalis. Oecologia 2006, 151:593-604.
46. Soto IM, Carreira VP, Soto EM, Hasson E. Wing morphology and fluctuating asymmetry depend on the host plant in cactophilic Drosophila. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:298-609.
47. Taylor CE, Kekic V. Sexual selection in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 1988, 42:197-199.
48. Vishalakshi C, Singh BN. Fluctuating asymmetry in certain morphological traits in laboratory populations of Drosophila ananassae. Genome 2006, 49:777-785.