Benchmarking the (1,4)-CMA-ES with mirrored sampling and sequential selection on the noisy BBOB-2010 testbed

Proceedings of the 12th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO '10 - Companion Publication

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1625-1632

  Auger, Anne ^a   Brockhoff, Dimo ^a   Hansen, Nikolaus ^a  

^a INRIA SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Black box optimization

Indexed keywords

BLACK-BOX OPTIMIZATION; LOCAL SEARCH; LOCAL SEARCH STRATEGY; MATRIX; OPTIMIZING FUNCTIONS; SEARCH SPACES; SEQUENTIAL SELECTION; SPEED-UPS; STOCHASTIC SEARCH ALGORITHMS;

COVARIANCE MATRIX; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; OPTIMIZATION; SPHERES; TEST FACILITIES; TESTBEDS;

BENCHMARKING;

EID: 77955955926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1830761.1830782     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Benchmarking the (1,4)-CMA-ES with mirrored sampling and sequential selection on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
2. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Investigating the impact of sequential selection in the (1,2)-CMA-ES on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
3. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Investigating the impact of sequential selection in the (1,2)-CMA-ES on the noisy BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
4. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Investigating the impact of sequential selection in the (1,4)-CMA-ES on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
5. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Investigating the impact of sequential selection in the (1,4)-CMA-ES on the noisy BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
6. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Mirrored sampling and sequential selection for evolution strategies. Rapport de Recherche RR-7249, INRIA Saclay - Île-de-France, April 2010.
7. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Mirrored variants of the (1,2)-CMA-ES compared on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
8. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Mirrored variants of the (1,2)-CMA-ES compared on the noisy BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
9. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Mirrored variants of the (1,4)-CMA-ES compared on the noiseless BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
10. A. Auger, D. Brockhoff, and N. Hansen. Mirrored variants of the (1,4)-CMA-ES compared on the noisy BBOB-2010 testbed. In GECCO (Companion), 2010.
11. A. Auger, S. Finck, N. Hansen, and R. Ros. BBOB 2009: Comparison tables of all algorithms on all noiseless functions. Technical Report RT-0383, INRIA, April 2010.
12. A. Auger, S. Finck, N. Hansen, and R. Ros. BBOB 2009: Comparison tables of all algorithms on all noisy functions. Technical Report RT-0384, INRIA, 04 2010.
13. A. Auger and N. Hansen. A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In Proc. IEEE Congress On Evolutionary Computation, pages 1769-1776, 2005.
14. A. Auger and N. Hansen. Benchmarking the (1+1)-CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 function testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2459-2466.
15. A. Auger and N. Hansen. Benchmarking the (1+1)-CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 noisy testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2467-2472.
16. S. Finck, N. Hansen, R. Ros, and A. Auger. Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2010: Presentation of the noisy functions. Technical Report 2009/21, Research Center PPE, 2010.
17. C. García-Martínez and M. Lozano. A continuous variable neighbourhood search based on specialised EAs: application to the noisy BBO-benchmark 2009 testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2367-2374.
18. N. Hansen. The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review. In J. Lozano, P. Larranaga, I. Inza, and E. Bengoetxea, editors, Towards a new evolutionary computation. Advances on estimation of distribution algorithms, pages 75-102. Springer, 2006.
19. N. Hansen. Benchmarking a BI-population CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 function testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2389-2396.
20. N. Hansen. Benchmarking a BI-population CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 noisy testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2397-2402.
21. N. Hansen, A. Auger, S. Finck, and R. Ros. Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2010: Experimental setup. Technical Report RR-7215, INRIA, 2010.
22. N. Hansen, A. Auger, R. Ros, S. Finck, and P. Pošík. Comparing results of 31 algorithms from the black-box optimization benchmarking BBOB-2009. In Workshop Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2010). ACM Press, 2010. to appear.
23. N. Hansen, S. Finck, R. Ros, and A. Auger. Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2009: Noiseless functions definitions. Technical Report RR-6829, INRIA, 2009.
24. N. Hansen, S. Finck, R. Ros, and A. Auger. Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2009: Noisy functions definitions. Technical Report RR-6869, INRIA, 2009. Updated February 2010.
25. N. Hansen and S. Kern. Evaluating the CMA evolution strategy on multimodal test functions. In X. Yao et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VIII, volume 3242 of LNCS, pages 282-291. Springer, 2004.
26. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159-195, 2001.
27. M. Lunacek, D. Whitley, and A. Sutton. The impact of global structure on search. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pages 498-507, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
28. R. Ros. Benchmarking sep-CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 noisy testbed. In Rothlauf [29], pages 2441-2446.
29. F. Rothlauf, editor. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2009, Proceedings, Montreal, Québec, Canada, July 8-12, 2009, Companion Material. ACM, 2009.