|
Volumn 304, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 897-898
|
Minimizing bias due to confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness research: The importance of restriction
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;
BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
DIURETIC AGENT;
ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;
ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;
ANGINA PECTORIS;
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK;
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS;
CONFOUNDING VARIABLE;
DISEASE COURSE;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION;
HEART INFARCTION;
HORMONAL THERAPY;
HUMAN;
NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS;
NOTE;
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
VEIN THROMBOSIS;
ARTICLE;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
OBSERVATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
STATISTICS;
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES;
COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH;
CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2;
HUMANS;
HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS;
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;
OBSERVATION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
|
EID: 77955953084
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1205 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (116)
|
References (10)
|