Pollen flow analysis in Sunflower [Helianthus annuus L.]

Helia

Volumn 32, Issue 51, 2009, Pages 11-18

  Alba, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cytoplasmic male sterility; Pollen flow; Sunflower

Indexed keywords

HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS;

EID: 77955949671     PISSN: 10181806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/HEL0951011A     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arlas, D.M., Rieseberg, L.H., 1994. Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflower. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 655-660.
2. Daniell, H., 2002. Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology 20: 581-586.
3. Ellstrand, N.C., 1988. Pollen as vehicle for the escape of engineered genes? Tree 3: 30S-32S.
4. Ellstrand, N.C., Prentice, H.C., Hancock, J.F., 1999. Gene flow and introgresslon from domesticated plants into their relatives. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 539-563.
5. Faure, N., Serieys, H., Bervillè, A., 2002. Potential gene flow from cultivated sunflower to volunteer, wild Helianthus species in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 89: 183-190.
6. Guadagnuolo, R., Savova-Bianchi, D., Felber, F., 2001. Gene flow from wheat [Triticum aestivum L.) to jointed goatgrass [Aegilops cylindrica Host.), as revealed by RAPD and microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 1-8.
7. Giddings, G.D., Sackville Hamilton, N.R., Hayward, M.D., 1997a. The release of genetically modified grasses. Part 1: Pollen dispersal to traps in Lolium perenne. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 1000-1006.
8. Giddings, G.D., Sackville Hamilton, N.R., Hayward, M.D., 1997b. The release of genetically modified grasses. Part 2: The influence of wind direction on pollen dispersal. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 1007-1014.
9. Jorgensen, R.B., Hauser, T., Mikkelsen, T.R., Ostergard, H., 1996. Transfer of engineered genes from crop to wild plants. Trends in Plant Science 1: 356-358.
10. Keeler, K.H., Turner, C.E., 1990. Management of transgenic plants in the environment. In: Levin, M., Strauss, H. (eds.). Risk assessment in genetic engineering: environmental release of organisms. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 189-218.
11. Manasse, R.S., 1992. Ecological risks of transgenic plants: effects of spatial dispersion of gene flow. Ecological Applications 2: 431-438.
12. th COLUMA Conference, International Meeting of Weed Control, Versailles, France, pp.701-707.
13. Onofri, A., Rosellini, D., Tel, F., Veronesi, F., 2006. Le plante geneticamente modificate nell'agricoltura Umbra. In: Coesistenza tra colture geneticamente modificate, convenzionali e biologiche nel contesto dell'agricoltura Umbra, Cornicchia Grafiche, Perugia, Italy pp. 1-24. /ISBN 88-8762-11-2/.
14. Ritala, A., Nuutila, A.M., Aikasalo, R., Kauppinen, V., Tammisola, J., 2002. Measuring gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic barley. Crop Science 42: 278-285.
15. Saetz, C., Pohl, M., Bartsch, D., 2000. Monitoring gene flow from transgenic sugar beet using cytoplasmic male sterile bait plants. Molecular ecology 9: 2035-2040.
16. Scheffler, J.A., Dale, P.J., 1994. Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape {Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Research 3: 263-278.
17. Whitton, J., Wolf, D.E., Arias, D.M., Snow, A.A. and Rieseberg, L.H., 1997. The persistence of cultivar alleles in wild populations of sunflowers five generations after hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 33-40.
18. Wolfenbarger, L.L., Phifer, P.R., 2000. The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290: 2088-2093.