Effect of zinc foliar application at an early stage of maize growth on patterns of nutrients and dry matter accumulation by the canopy: Part II. Nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation patterns;Wpływ dolistnego stosowania cynku we wczesnej fazie wzrostu kukurydzy na wzorce akumulacji skladników pokarmowych i suchej masy przez łan: Cz. II. Wzorce pobierania azotu i akumulacji suchej masy

Journal of Elementology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-40

  Grzebisz, Witold ^a   Wrońiska, Małgorzata ^b   Diatta, Jean B ^a   Szczepaniak, Witold ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b Agencja Rezerw Materiałowych ^*  (Poland)

Author keywords

Absolute crop growth rate (CGR); Dry matter; Growth analysis; Maize; Nitrogen; Relative plant growth rate (RGR)

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77955939675     PISSN: 16442296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cakmak I. 2002. Plant nutrition research: Priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant Soil, 247: 3-24.
2. Cazetta J.O., Seebauer J.R., Below F.E. 1999. Sucrose and nitrogen supplies regulate growth of maize kernels. Ann. Bot., 84: 747-754.
3. Elmore R., Abendroth L. 2006. To be determinated: ear row numbers and kernels per row in corn. Integrated Crop Management, IC-496, 151-152.
4. Fotyma E. 1994. Crop plants response to nitrogen fertilization. Part III. Maize. Fragm. Agronom., 4 (44): 21-34, (in Polish).
5. Grzebisz W., Wrońska M., Diatta B., Dulllm P. 2008. Effect of zinc foliar application at the early stage of maize growth on the patterns of nutrients and dry matter accumulation by the canopy. Part I. Zinc uptake patterns and its redistribution among maize organs. J. Elemental, 13(1): 17-28.
6. Guliev N., Bairamov S., Ad Aliev D. 1992. Functional organization of carbonic anhydrase in higher plants. Sov. Plant Physiol., 39: 537-544.
7. Hunt R., Causton D.R., Shipley B., Askew A.P. 2002. A modern tool for classical plant growth analysis. Ann. Bot., 90: 485-488.
8. Jones R.J., Schreiber B.M.N., Roessler J.A. 1996. Kernel sink capacity in maize: Genotypic and maternal regulation. Crop Sc, 36: 301-306.
9. Marschner H. 1986. Mineral nutrition in higher plants. Acad. Pres, pp. 300-312.
10. Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci., 11: 15-19.
11. Pommel B., Gallai A., Coque M., Quillere I., Hirel B., Prioul J.L., Andrieu B., Floriot M. 2006. Carbon and nitrogen allocation and grain filling in three maize hybrids differing in senescence. Europ. J. Agronomy, 24: 200-211.
12. Rajcan I., Tollenaar M. 1999. Source: sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: I. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning during grain filling. Field Crops Res., 60: 245-253.
13. Roberts T. 2006. Improving nutrient use efficiency. In: Proc. of the IFA Agriculture Conference: Optimizing resource use efficiency for sustainable intensification of agriculture. 27 February-2 March, 2006. Kunming, China, pp 8.
14. Sinclair T.R., Purcell L.C., Sneller C.H. 2004. Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends Plant Sci., 9 (2) 70-75.
15. Sturm H., Buchner A., Zerulla W. 1994. Gezielter Duengen. DLG Verlag, pp. 319-326.
16. Subedi K.D., Ma B.L. 2005. Nitrogen uptake and partitioning in stay-green leafy maize hybrids. Crop Sci, 45: 740-747.
17. Townsend A. et al. 2003. Human health effects of a changing global nitrogen cycle. Front Ecol. Environ., 1(5): 240-246.
18. Uhart S.A., Andrade F.H. 1995. Nitrogen and carbon accumulation and remobilization during grain filling in maize under different source I sink ratio. Crop Sci., 35: 183-190.
19. Wichmann W. 1996/2006. World Fertilizer Use Manual IFA, Paris, France.