Reservoir modelling of complex geological systems - A multiple-point perspective

Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 59-68

  Eskandaridalvand, K ^a   Srinivasan, S ^a  

^a The University of Texas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; GEOLOGIC MODELS; GRAPHIC METHODS; OIL WELL FLOODING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR ENGINEERING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; STATISTICS;

DYNAMIC DATA; GEOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; MATCHED MODELS; MULTIPLE POINT HISTOGRAMS; MULTIPLE POINTS; MULTIPLE-POINT STATISTICS; RESERVOIR MODELS; SUB-SURFACES; SURFACE OIL; TWO POINT STATISTICS;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 77955936107     PISSN: 00219487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/139917-PA     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Matheron. G. 1973. The Intrinsic Random Functions and their Applications. Advances in Applied Probability 5 (3): 439. doi:10.2307/1425829.
2. Journel, A.G. 1974. Geostatistics for Conditional Simulation of Ore bodies. Economic Geology 69 (5): 673-687. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.69.5.673.
3. Journel, A.G. 1983. Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions. Mathematical Geology 15 (3): 445-468. doi:10.1007/BF01031292.
4. Isaaks, E. 1990. The Application of Monte Carlo Methods to the Analysis of Spatially Correlated Data. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
5. Srivastava, R.M. 1992. Reservoir Characterization With Probability Field Simulation. Paper SPE 24753 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, 4-7 October, doi:10.2118/24753-MS.
6. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Chiles, J.-P. andDelfmer, P. 1999. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. New York: Wylie Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.
8. Journel, A.G. andHuijbregts, C.J. 1978. Mining Geostatistics. London: Academic Press Limited.
9. Deutsch, C.V andLewis, R.W. 1992. Advances in the Practical Implementation of Indicator Geostatistics. Proc., 23rd APCOM Symposium, Tucson, Arizona, USA, 7-11 April, 169-179.
10. Deutsch, C.V. andGringarten, E. 2000. Accounting for multiplepoint continuity in geostatistical modeling. Presented at the 6th International Geostatistical Congress (GEOSTATS 2000), Cape Town, South Africa, 10-14 April.
11. Caers, J. 1998. Stochastic simulation using neural networks. Proc, Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting, Annual Meeting, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA, 7-8 May, Vol. 11.
12. Strebelle, S. 2000. Sequential simulation drawing structures from training images. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
13. Stoyan, D., Kendal, W.S., and Mecke, J. 1987. Stochastic Geometry and its Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Haldorsen, H.H. andDamsleth, E. 1990. Stochastic Modeling. J Pet Technol 42 (4): 404-412. SPE-20321-PA. doi:10.2118/20321-PA.
15. Journel, A. 2005. Multiple point statistics. In Proceedings of IAMG 05: GIS and Spatial Analysis, ed. Q. Cheng and G. Bonham-Carter. Toronto, Canada: IAMG.
16. Nelson, R.W. 1960. In-Place Measurement of Permeability in Heterogeneous Media: 1. Theory of a Proposed Method. Journal of Geophysical Research 65 (6): 1753-1758. doi:10.1029/ JZ065i006p01753.
17. Kashib, T. andSrinivasan, S. 2003. Iterative Integration of Dynamic Data in Reservoir Models. Paper SPE 84592 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October, doi: 10.2118/84592-MS.
18. Kim, Y. 2007. Probabilistic framework-based history matching algorithm utilizing sub-domain delineation and software 'Pro-HMS'. MSc thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (December 2007).
19. Hu, L.Y. 2000. Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Gaussian-Related Stochastic Models. Mathematical Geology 32 (1): 87-108. doi:10.1023/A:1007506918588.
20. Hu, L.Y. andLe Ravalec-Dupin, M. 2004. An Improved Gradual Deformation Method for Reconciling Random and Gradient Searches in Stochastic Optimizations. Mathematical Geology 36 (6): 703-719. doi:10.1023/B:MATG.0000039542.73994.a2.
21. Barrera, A.E. 2006. Improved Geological Modeling and Dynamic Data Integration Using the Probability Perturbation Approach. MSc thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (May 2006).
22. Eskandari, K. andSrinivasan, S. 2007. Growthsim - A multiple point framework for pattern simulation. Presented at Petroleum Geostatistics 2007,Cascais, Portugal, 10-14 September.
23. Journel, A.G. 2002. Combining Knowledge from Diverse Sources: An Alternative to Traditional Data Independence Hypotheses. Mathematical Geology34 (5): 573-596. doi:10.1023/A:1016047012594.