Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: Emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 53-62

  Hershberger, Patricia E ^a   Pierce, Penny F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Couples; Decision making; Genetic testing; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Theory development

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; EMOTIONALITY; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MORALITY; NIDATION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; EMOTION; ETHICS; FEMALE; INFERTILITY THERAPY; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SPOUSE;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MORALS; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SPOUSES;

EID: 77955923867     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.017     Document Type: Short Survey

References (128)

1. Handyside A.H., Kontogianni E.H., Hardy K., Winston R.M. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990, 344:768-770.
2. Verlinsky Y., Ginsberg N., Lifchez A., Valle J., Moise J., Strom C.M. Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1990, 5:826-829.
3. International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of 3000 clinical cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2001, 3:49-53.
4. Verlinsky Y., Rechitsky S., Sharapova T., Morris R., Taranissi M., Kuliev A. Preimplantation HLA testing. J Amer Med Assoc 2004, 291:2079-2085.
5. Goossens V., Harton G., Moutou C., Scriven P.N., Traeger-Synodinos J., Sermon K., Harper J.C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006. Hum Reprod 2008, 23:2629-2645.
6. Handyside A.H., Lesko J.G., Tarín J.J., Winston R.M., Hughes M.R. Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1992, 327:905-909.
7. Genesis Genetics Institute. PGD testing for hundreds of genetic disorders. (accessed 20/08/2009). http://www.genesisgenetics.org/.
8. Reproductive Genetics Institute. What single gene disorders can be tested? (accessed 20/08/2009). http://www.reproductivegenetics.com/.
9. Verlinsky Y., Rechitsky S., Schoolcraft W., Strom C., Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching. J Amer Med Assoc 2001, 285:3130-3133.
10. Sermon K. Current concepts in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): a molecular biologist's view. Hum Reprod Update 2002, 8:11-20.
11. Verlinsky Y., Cohen J., Munne S., Gianaroli L., Simpson J.L., Ferraretti A.P., Kuliev A. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil Steril 2004, 82:292-294.
12. Fiorentino F., Biricik A., Nuccitelli A., De Palma R., Kahraman S., Iacobelli M., Trengia V., Caserta D., Bonu M.A., Borini A., Baldi M. Strategies and clinical outcome of 250 cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single gene disorders. Hum Reprod 2006, 21:670-684.
13. Renwick P., Ogilvie C.M. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases: overview and emerging issues. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2007, 7:33-43.
14. Sermon K.D., Michiels A., Harton G., Moutou C., Repping S., Scriven P.N., SenGupta S., Traeger-Synodinos J., Vesela K., Viville S., Wilton L., Harper J.C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:323-336.
15. Harper J.C., de Die-Smulders C., Goossens V., Harton G., Moutou C., Repping S., Scriven P.N., SenGupta S., Traeger-Synodinos J., Van Rij M.C., Viville S., Wilton L., Sermon K.D. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection VII: cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005. Hum Reprod 2008, 23:741-755.
16. Verlinsky Y., Rechitsky S., Verlinsky O., Masciangelo C., Lederer K., Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for early-onset Alzheimer disease caused by V717L mutation. J Amer Med Assoc 2002, 287:1018-1021.
17. Rechitsky S., Verlinsky O., Chistokhina A., Sharapova T., Ozen S., Masciangelo C., Verlinsky Y., Kuliev A. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer predisposition. Reprod Biomed Online 2002, 5:148-155.
18. Debrock S., Melotte C., Vermeesch J., Spiessens C., Vanneste E., D'Hooghe T.M. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy in embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not improve reproductive outcome in women over 35: a prospective controlled randomized study. Fertil Steril 2007, 88:S237.
19. Mastenbroek S., Twisk M., van Echten-Arends J., Sikkema-Raddatz B., Korevaar J.C., Verhoeve H.R., Vogel N.E., Arts E.G., de Vries J.W., Bossuyt P.M., Buys C.H., Heineman M.J., Repping S., van der Veen F. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:9-17.
20. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Preimplantation genetic testing: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2007, 88:1497-1504.
21. Collins F.S., Green E.D., Guttmacher A.E., Guyer M.S. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 2003, 422:835-847.
22. President's Council on Bioethics Reproduction and responsibility: the regulation of new biotechnologies 2004, President's Council on Bioethics, Washington, DC.
23. European Societies of Human Genetics and Human Reproduction and Embryology The need for interaction between assisted reproduction technology and genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2006, 14:509-511.
24. Woodsong C., Severy L.J. Generation of knowledge for reproductive health technologies: constraints on social and behavioral research. J Soc Issues 2005, 61:193-205.
25. Soini S., Ibarreta D., Anastasiadou V., Aymé S., Braga S., Cornel M., Coviello D.A., Evers-Kiebooms G., Geraedts J., Gianaroli L., Harper J., Kosztolanyi G., Lundin K., Rodrigues-Cerezo E., Sermon K., Sequeiros J., Tranebjaerg L., Kääriäinen H. The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. Eur J Hum Genet 2006, 14:588-645.
26. Khoury M.J., Gwinn M., Yoon P.W., Dowling N., Moore C.A., Bradley L. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention?. Genet Med 2007, 9:665-674.
27. Klitzman R., Appelbaum P.S., Chung W., Sauer M. Anticipating issues related to increasing preimplantation genetic diagnosis use: a research agenda. Reprod Biomed Online 2008, 17:33-42.
28. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) Guidelines for good practice in PGD. Reprod Biomed Online 2004, 9:430-434.
29. Thornhill A.R., deDie-Smulders C.E., Geraedts J.P., Harper J.C., Harton G.L., Lavery S.A., Moutou C., Robinson M.D., Schmutzler A.G., Scriven P.N., Sermon K.D., Wilton L. ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:35-48.
30. Patel V.L., Kaufman D.R., Arocha J.F. Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making. J Biomed Inform 2002, 35:52-75.
31. Cooper H. Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
32. Pergament E. Preimplantation diagnosis: a patient perspective. Prenat Diagn 1991, 11:493-500.
33. Miedzybrodzka Z., Templeton A., Dean J., Haites N., Mollison J., Smith N. Preimplantation diagnosis or chorionic villus biopsy? Women's attitudes and preferences. Hum Reprod 1993, 8:2192-2196.
34. Palomba M.L., Monni G., Lai R., Cau G., Olla G., Cao A. Psychological implications and acceptability of preimplantation diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1994, 9:360-362.
35. Snowdon C., Green J.M. Preimplantation diagnosis and other reproductive options: attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders. Hum Reprod 1997, 12:341-350.
36. Chamayou S., Guglielmino A., Giambona A., Siciliano S., Di Stefano G., Scibilia G., Humeau C., Maggio A., Di Leo S. Attitude of potential users in Sicily towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassaemia and aneuploidies. Hum Reprod 1998, 13:1936-1944.
37. Alkuraya F.S., Kilani R.A. Attitude of Saudi families affected with hemoglobinopathies towards prenatal screening and abortion and the influence of religious ruling (Fatwa). Prenat Diagn 2001, 21:448-451.
38. Henneman L., Bramsen I., Van Os T.A., Reuling I.E., Heyerman H.G., van der Laag J., van der Ploeg H.M., ten Kate L.P. Attitudes towards reproductive issues and carrier testing among adult patients and parents of children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Prenat Diagn 2001, 21:1-9.
39. Hui P.W., Lam Y.H., Chen M., Tang M.H., Yeung W.S., Ng E.H., Ho P.C. Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of alpha- and beta-thalassaemias in Hong Kong. Prenat Diagn 2002, 22:508-511.
40. Katz M.G., Fitzgerald L., Bankier A., Savulescu J., Cram D.S. Issues and concerns of couples presenting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenat Diagn 2002, 22:1117-1122.
41. Lavery S.A., Aurell R., Turner C., Castello C., Veiga A., Barri P.N., Winston R.M. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:2464-2467.
42. Fernández D.O., De Vincentiis S., Chillik C.F., Brugo-Olmedo S.P. Patients' opinions regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a Latin American fertility clinic. Fertil Steril 2004, 81:463-464.
43. Roberts C., Franklin S. Experiencing new forms of genetic choice: findings from an ethnographic study of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Fertil 2004, 7:285-293.
44. Kalfoglou A.L., Scott J., Hudson K. PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Repro Biomed Online 2005, 11:486-496.
45. Krones T., Schluter E., Manolopoulos K., Bock K., Tinneberg H.R., Koch M.C., Lindner M., Hoffmann G.F., Mayatepek E., Huels G., Neuwohner E., El Ansari S., Wissner T., Richter G. Public, expert and patients' opinions on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Germany. Reprod Biomed Online 2005, 10:116-123.
46. Alsulaiman A., Hewison J. Attitudes to prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis in Saudi parents at genetic risk. Prenat Diagn 2006, 26:1010-1014.
47. Menon U., Harper J., Sharma A., Fraser L., Burnell M., ElMasry K., Rodeck C., Jacobs I. Views of BRCA gene mutation carriers on preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a reproductive option for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:1573-1577.
48. Pope C., Mays N., Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods 2007, Open University Press, New York.
49. Glaser B.G. Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory 1978, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
50. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The discovery of grounded theory 1967, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
51. Hempel C. Philosophy of natural science 1966, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
52. Pasch L.A., Christensen A. Couples facing fertility problems. The psychology of couples and illness: theory, research, & practice 2000, 241-267. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. K.B. Schmaling, T.G. Sher (Eds.).
53. Edwards A., Elwyn G., Covey J., Matthews E., Pill R. Presenting risk information-a review of the effects of " framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun 2001, 6:61-82.
54. Liebaers I., Sermon K., Staessen C., Joris H., Lissens W., Van Assche E., Nagy P., Bonduelle M., Vandervorst M., Devroey P., Van Steirteghem A. Clinical experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998, 13:186-195.
55. Min J.K., Breheny S.A., MacLachlan V., Healy D.L. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004, 19:3-7.
56. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports 2008, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
57. Grace J., El-Toukhy T., Scriven P., Ogilvie C., Pickering S., Lashwood A., Flinter F., Khalaf Y., Braude P. Three hundred and thirty cycles of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for serious genetic disease: clinical considerations affecting outcome. BJOG 2006, 113:1393-1401.
58. Lewis C.M., Pinêl T., Whittaker J.C., Handyside A.H. Controlling misdiagnosis errors in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comprehensive model encompassing extrinsic and intrinsic sources of error. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:43-50.
59. Johnson D.S., Rabinowitz M., Cinnioglu C., Keller J., Banjevic M., Singer J., Baner J., Sheena J., Behr B. Novel technology for simultaneous reliable measurement of multiple alleles and copy number across 24 chromosomes in single human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 2008, 89:S5.
60. Reddy U.M., Wapner R.J., Rebar R.W., Tasca R.J. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:967-977.
61. Nekkebroeck J., Bonduelle M., Desmyttere S., Van den Broeck W., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Mental and psychomotor development of 2-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening. Hum Reprod 2008, 23:1560-1566.
62. Tur-Kaspa I., Horwitz A., Ginsberg N., Cieslak J., Rechitsky S., Verlinsky Y. Clinical outcome of PGD. Fertil Steril 2005, 84:S99.
63. Hansen M., Kurinczuk J.J., Bower C., Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:725-730.
64. Gosden R., Trasler J., Lucifero D., Faddy M. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet 2003, 361:1975-1977.
65. DeBaun M.R., Niemitz E.L., Feinberg A.P. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet 2003, 72:156-160.
66. Inhorn M.C. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:1837-1851.
67. Hudson K.L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: public policy and public attitudes. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:1638-1645.
68. Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:876-881.
69. Nachtigall R.D. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:871-875.
70. Thaele M., Uszkoreit M. Legislature's impact on the outcome of infertility treatments-the German political contradiction. Pharm Policy Law 2007, 9:221-227.
71. Galpern E. Assisted reproductive technologies: overview and perspective using a reproductive justice framework. Oakland, CA: Center for Genetics and Society, 2007. (accessed 14/11/2008). http://geneticsandsociety.org/downloads/ART.pdf.
72. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Q6: Is in vitro fertilization expensive? In: Frequently asked questions about infertility.: (accessed 31/03/2009). http://www.asrm.org/Patients/faqs.html.
73. van Balen F., Verdurmen J., Ketting E. Choices and motivations of infertile couples. Patient Educ Couns 1997, 31:19-27.
74. Katz P., Nachtigall R., Showstack J. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies. Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4:S29-S32.
75. Jain T., Harlow B.L., Hornstein M.D. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:661-666.
76. Henne M.B., Bundorf M.K. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril 2008, 89:66-73.
77. Kalfoglou A.L., Doksum T., Bernhardt B., Geller G., LeRoy L., Mathews D.J., Evans J.H., Doukas D.J., Reame N., Scott J., Hudson K. Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies: hopes and fears for our genetic future. Fertil Steril 2005, 83:1612-1621.
78. Inhorn M.C., Fakih M.H. Arab Americans, African Americans, and infertility: barriers to reproduction and medical care. Fertil Steril 2006, 85:844-852.
79. Zeiler K. Reproductive autonomous choice-a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Med Health Care Philos 2004, 7:175-183.
80. Banger E., McGee G. Aspiring parents, genotypes and phenotypes: the unexamined myth of the perfect baby. Albany Law Rev 2005, 68:1097-1111.
81. Hershberger P.E. Pregnant, donor oocyte recipient women describe their lived experience of establishing the " family lexicon" J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2007, 36:161-167.
82. Sanfey A.G. Decision neuroscience: new directions in studies of judgment and decision making. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2007, 16:151-155.
83. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. I. The moral status of the pre-implantation embryo. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:1046-1048.
84. Roberts J.C. Customizing conception: a survey of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the resulting social, ethical, and legal dilemmas. Duke Law Technol Rev 2002, July 23.
85. Krones T., Richter G. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): European perspectives and the German situation. J Med Philos 2004, 29:623-640.
86. de Melo-Martin I., Rosenwaks Z., Fins J.J. New methods for deriving embryonic stem cell lines: are the ethical problems solved?. Fertil Steril 2006, 86:1330-1332.
87. Freeman J.S. Arguing along the slippery slope of human embryo research. J Med Philos 1996, 21:61-81.
88. Lockwood M. The moral status of the human embryo: implications for IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2005, 10(Suppl 1):17-20.
89. Pickering S.J., Braude P.R., Patel M., Burns C.J., Trussler J., Bolton V., Minger S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a novel source of embryos for stem cell research. Reprod Biomed Online 2003, 7:353-364.
90. Cameron C., Williamson R. Is there an ethical difference between preimplantation genetic diagnosis and abortion?. J Med Ethics 2003, 29:90-92.
91. Robertson J.A. Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate. Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2003, 18:465-471.
92. Kass L.R. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. New Repub 1997, 216:17-26.
93. Gillam L. Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled. J Med Ethics 1999, 25:163-171.
94. McMahan J. The morality of screening for disability. Reprod Biomed Online 2005, 10(Suppl. 1):129-132.
95. Vergeer M.M., van Balen F., Ketting E. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an alternative to amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: psychosocial and ethical aspects. Patient Educ Couns 1998, 35:5-13.
96. Krahn T. Where are we going with preimplantation genetic diagnosis?. CMAJ 2007, 176:1445-1446.
97. Savulescu J. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics 2001, 15:413-426.
98. Savulescu J. In defence of procreative beneficence. J Med Ethics 2007, 33:284-288.
99. Viville S., Pergament D. Results of a survey of the legal status and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis conducted in 13 different countries. Prenat Diagn 1998, 18:1374-1380.
100. Suter S.M. A brave new world of designer babies?. Berkeley Technol Law J 2007, 22:897-969.
101. Meister U., Finck C., Stöbel-Richter Y., Schmutzer G., Brähler E. Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:231-238.
102. Savulescu J. Sex selection-the case for. Med J Aust 1999, 171:373-375.
103. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001, 75:861-864.
104. Malpani A. PGD and sex selection. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:517.
105. Pennings G. Personal desires of patients and social obligations of geneticists: applying preimplantation genetic diagnosis for non-medical sex selection. Prenat Diagn 2002, 22:1123-1129.
106. Steinbock B. Sex selection: not obviously wrong. Hastings Cent Rep 2002, 32:23-28.
107. Stern J.E., Cramer C.P., Green R.M., Garrod A., DeVries K.O. Determining access to assisted reproductive technology: reactions of clinic directors to ethically complex case scenarios. Hum Reprod 2003, 18:1343-1352.
108. Keye W.R., Bradshaw K.D. A survey of the practices and opinions of the domestic members of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2004, 82:536-542.
109. Jain T., Missmer S.A., Gupta R.S., Hornstein M.D. Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences in an infertility population. Fertil Steril 2005, 83:649-658.
110. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) ACOG Committee opinion no. 360: sex selection. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:475-478.
111. Williams C., Ehrich K., Farsides B., Scott R. Facilitating choice, framing choice: staff views on widening the scope of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65:1094-1105.
112. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Code of practice. 7th ed. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2009. (accessed this on 29/12/2009). http://www.hfea.gov.uk/code.html.
113. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 2nd ed.
114. Raiffa H. Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty 1968, Random House, New York.
115. Lau R.R. Models of decision making. Oxford handbook of political psychology 2003, 19-59. Oxford University Press, New York. D.O. Sears, L. Huddy, R. Jervis (Eds.).
116. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
117. Klein G.A., Orasanu J., Calderwood R., Zsambok C.E. Decision making in action: models and methods 1993, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
118. Connolly T., Arkes H.R., Hammond K.R. Judgment and decision making: an interdisciplinary reader 1999, Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed.
119. Simon H.A. Administrative behavior 1947, Macmillan, New York.
120. Simon H.A. Models of man: social and rational 1957, Wiley, New York.
121. Simon H.A. Information processing models of cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 1979, 30:363-396.
122. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cogn Psychol 1972, 3:430-454.
123. Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev 1973, 80:237-251.
124. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
125. Loewenstein G. Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1996, 65:272-292.
126. Zajonc R.B. Emotions. The handbook of social psychology, vol. 1 1998, 591-632. Academic Press, New York. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
127. Lerner J.S., Keltner D. Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cogn Emot 2000, 14:473-493.
128. Bechara A., Damasio H., Tranel D., Damasio A.R. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 1997, 275:1293-1295.