Abduction

The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 454-463

  Hansen, Hans ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955920570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781849200394.n77     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K.(2000) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
2. Blumer, H.(1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Bonfantini, M. A. and Proni, G.(1983) ’To guess or not to guess?’, in U. Eco and T. Sebeok (eds) The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. 119-134.
4. Calas, M. B. Smircich, L. ’Past postmodernism? Reflections and tentative directions’Academy of Management Review 24 649-671 (1999)
5. Carettini, G. P.(1983) Peirce, Holmes, Popper’, in U. Eco and T. Sebeok (eds) The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. 135-153.
6. Davis, W. H.(1972) Peirce's Epistemology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2802-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2802-8
7. Dewey, J.(1925) ’The Development of American pragmatism’, in Hickman, L. and Alexander, T. (1998) The Essential Dewey. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
8. Eco, U.(1983) ’Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction’, in U. Eco and T. Sebeok (eds) The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. 198-220.
9. Fann, K. T.(1970) Peirce's Theory of Abduction. The Hague: Mertinus Nijhoff.doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3163-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3163-9
10. Gaillie, W. B.(1966) Peirce and Pragmatism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
11. Hanson, N. R.(1958) Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hatch, M. J. ’Jazz as a metaphor for organization in the 21st century’Organizational Seience 9 556-557 (1998)doi:10.1287/orsc.9.5.556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.5.556
13. Hanson, N. R.(1959) ’Is there a logic of scientific discovery?’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds) Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14. Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F.(1994) ’Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice’, in N. K Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 262-272.
15. James, W.(1907/1975) ’Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking’, in W. James, Pragmatism and The Meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 1-166.
16. James, W.(1909/1975) ’The Meaning of Truth: A sequel to "pragmatism"’, in W. James, Pragmatism and The Meaning of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 167-352.
17. Kuhn, T.(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Mead, G. H.(1934) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Peirce, C. S.(1960) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Peirce, C. S.(1955) Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Justus Buchler (ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
21. Peirce, C.(1877) ’The fixation of belief’, in N. Houser and C. Kloesel (1992) The Essential Peirce, Vol 1. Indiana:Indiana University Press.
22. Peirce, C.(1878) ’How to make our ideas clear’, in N. Houser and C. Kloesel (1992) The Essential Peirce, Vol 1. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
23. Popper, K. R.(1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
24. Rescher, N.(1978) Peirce's Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
25. Reilly, F. E, (1970) Charles Peirce's Theory of Scintific Method. New York: Fordham University Press.
26. Schutz, A.(1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
27. Seheffler, I.(1974) Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
28. Sebeok, T. A. and Umiker-Sebeok, J.(1983) ’You know my method: A juxtaposition of Charles S. Perice and Sherlock Holmes’, in U. Eco and T. Sebeok (eds), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. 11-54.
29. Taylor, S. Hansen, H. ’Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics’Journal of Management Studies 42 (6) 1211-1231 (2004)doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
30. Turner, J. H.(1987) ’Analytical Theorizing’, in A. Giddens and J. Turner (eds), Social Theory Today, Stanford: Stanford University Press. pp. 156-194.
31. Weick, K.(1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Weick, K. ’Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis’Organization Science 9 (5) 543-555 (1998)doi:10.1287/orsc.9.5.543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.5.543
33. Weick, K. E. ’Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination’Academy of Management Review 14 516-531 (1989)
34. Weick, K.(1987) 'substitutes for strategy’, in J. Teece (ed.) The Competitive Challenge. Cambridge, MA: Balinger.