Microbial and antibiotic resistant constituents associated with biological aerosols and poultry litter within a commercial poultry house

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 408, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 4770-4777

  Brooks, J P ^a   McLaughlin, M R ^a   Scheffler, B ^b   Miles, D M ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

16S rRNA; Aerosol; Antibiotic resistant; Bacteria; Poultry

Indexed keywords

AEROBIC BACTERIA; AEROSOLS; ANTIBIOTICS; HOUSES; POULTRY; RNA;

16S RRNA; ANTIBIOTIC CLASS; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA; BIOLOGICAL AEROSOL; FECAL INDICATORS; PATHOGENIC BACTERIUM; POPULATION CHANGE;

BACTERIA;

RNA 16S; AEROSOL; AIR POLLUTANT; ENDOTOXIN; MANURE;

AEROSOL; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; BACTERIUM; POULTRY; RNA;

AEROBIC BACTERIUM; AEROSOL; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTOXIN DETECTION; ENTEROCOCCUS; FECES ANALYSIS; KIRBY BAUER METHOD; LITTER FALL; MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION; NONHUMAN; POULTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA ANALYSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; AIR POLLUTANT; ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL COUNT; CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MANURE; MICROBIOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GALLUS GALLUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS;

AEROSOLS; AIR MICROBIOLOGY; AIR POLLUTANTS; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; ENDOTOXINS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HOUSING, ANIMAL; MANURE; POULTRY;

EID: 77955919928     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.038     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AdWeek. Tyson to appeal marketing ban: Antibiotics at crux of poultry products advertising dispute. Retrieved Sept 2009, from http://www.adweekmedia.com/aw/content_display/news/client/e3i312d811d7acd5b87d6adb109aa6f80c1.
2. Al-Zenki S.F., Al-Nasser A.Y., Al-Saffar A.E., Abdullah F.K., AL-Bahouh M.E., Al-Haddad A.S., et al. Effects of using a chicken-origin competitive exclusion culture and probiotic cultures on reducing Salmonella in broilers. J Appl Poult Res 2009, 18:23-29.
3. Associated Press. Tyson to sell chicken free of antibiotics. Retrieved Sept 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/business/20tyson.html?_r=2&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.
4. Bakutis B., Monstviliene E., Januskeviciene G. Analyses of airborne contamination with bacteria, endotoxin, and dust in livestock barns and poultry houses. Acta Vet Brno 2004, 73:283-289.
5. Banhazi T.M., Seedorf J., Laffrique M., Rutley D.L. Identification of the risk factors for high airborne particle concentrations in broiler buildings using statistical modeling. Biosystems Eng 2008, 101:100-110.
6. Bauer A.W., Kirby W., Sherris J., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized disc method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966, 45:493-496.
7. Baykov B., Stoyanov M. Microbial air pollution caused by intensive broiler chicken breeding. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1999, 29:389-392.
8. Brooks J.P., McLaughlin M.R. Antibiotic resistant profiles of anaerobic swine lagoon effluent. J Environ Qual 2009, 38:2431-2437.
9. Brooks J.P., Gerba C.P., Pepper I.L. Aerosol emission, fate, and transport from municipal and animal wastes. J Residuals Sci Technol 2004, 1:13-25.
10. Brooks J.P., Tanner B.D., Josephson K.L., Gerba C.P., Haas C.N., Pepper I.L. A national study on the residential impact of biological aerosols from the land application of biosolids. J Appl Microbiol 2005, 99:310-322.
11. Cole J., Chai B., Marsh T., Farris R., Wang Q., Kulum S., et al. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:442-443.
12. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6 2004, Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
13. Hartung J, Schulz J. Risks caused by bio-aerosols in poultry houses. Retrieved Sept 2009, from http://www.fao.org/AG/againfo/home/events/bangkok2007/docs/part2/2_10.pdf.
14. Heidelberg J.F., Shahamat M., Levin M., Rahman I., Stelma G., Grim C., et al. Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability of gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63:3585-3588.
15. Just N., Duchaine C., Singh B. An aerobiological perspective of dust in cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations. J Occup Med Toxicol 2009, 4(13):1-8.
16. Kelley T.R., Pancorbo O.C., Merka W.C., Thompson S.A., Cabrera M.L., Barnhart H.M. Fate of selected bacterial pathogens and indicators in fractionated poultry litter during storage. J Appl Poultry Res 1994, 3:279-288.
17. Kelley T.R., Pancorbo O.C., Merka W.C., Barnhart H.M. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial litter isolates. Poult Sci 1998, 77:243-247.
18. Kumar S., Tamura K., Neil M. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 2004, 5:150-163.
19. Lieberman J.M. Appropriate antibiotic use and why it is important: the challenges of bacterial resistance. Ped Infec Dis J 2003, 22:1143-1151.
20. Liu T., Liljebjelke K., Bartlett E., Hofacre C., Sanchez S., Maurer J.J. Application of nested PCR to screening poultry environments for Salmonella. J Food Prot 2002, 65:1227-1232.
21. Lu J., Sanchez S., Hofacre C., Maurer J.J., Harmon B.G., Lee M.D. Evaluation of broiler litter with reference to the microbial composition as assessed by using 16S rRNA and functional gene markers. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:901-908.
22. Miles D.M., Owens P.R., Rowe D.E. Spatial variability of litter gaseous flux within a commercial broiler house: Ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane. Poult Sci 2006, 85:167-172.
23. Montrose M.S., Shane S.M., Harrington K.S. Role of litter in the transmission of Campylobacter jejuni. Avian Dis 1985, 29:392-399.
24. Nather G., Alter T., Martin A., Ellerbroek L. Analysis of risk factors for Campylobacter species infection in broiler flocks. Poult Sci 2009, 88:1299-1305.
25. Opplinger A., Charriere N., Droz P.O., Rinsoz T. Exposure to bioaerosols in poultry houses at different stages of fattening; use of real-time PCR for airborne bacterial quantification. Ann Occup Hyg 2008, 52:405-412.
26. Pope M.J., Cherry T.E. An evaluation of the presence of pathogens on broilers raised on poultry litter treatment-treated litter. Poult Sci 2000, 79:1351-1355.
27. Poultry and egg association Frequently asked questions. Retrieved Sept 2009, from http://www.poultryegg.org/faq/faq.cfm.
28. Schloss P.D., Westcott S.L., Ryabin T., Hall J.H., Hartmann M., Hollister E.B., et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:7537-7541.
29. Sidhu J., Gibbs R.A., Ho G.E., Unkovich I. The role of indigenous microorganisms in suppression of Salmonella regrowth in composted biosolids. Water Res 2001, 35:913-920.
30. Taylor N.M., Davies R.H., Ridley A., Clouting C., Wales A.D., Clifton-Hadley F.A. A survey of fluoroquinolones resistance in Escherichia coli and thermophilic Campylobacter spp. on poultry and pig farms in Great Britain. J Appl Microbiol 2008, 105:1421-1431.
31. Terzich M., Pope M.J., Cherry T.E., Hollinger J. Survey of pathogens in poultry litter in the United States. J Appl Poultry Res 2000, 9:287-291.
32. Zaleski K.J., Josephson K.L., Gerba C.P., Pepper I.L. Potential regrowth and recolonization of Salmonellae and indicators in biosolids and biosolid-amended soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:3701-3708.
33. Zucker B.A., Trojan S., Muller W. Airborne gram-negative bacterial flora in animal houses. J Vet Med 2000, 47:37-46.