HIV transmission by stage of infection and pattern of sexual partnerships

Epidemiology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 676-684

  Kim, Jong Hoon ^a   Riolo, Rick L ^a   Koopman, James S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCURRENT INFECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; HIV INFECTIONS; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77955918936     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e6639f     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Jacquez JA, Koopman JS, Simon CP, Longini IM Jr. Role of the primary infection in epidemics of HIV infection in gay cohorts. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7:1169-1184.
2. Koopman JS, Jacquez JA, Welch GW, et al. The role of early HIV infection in the spread of HIV through populations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1997;14:249-258.
3. Rapatski BL, Suppe FP, Yorke JA. HIV epidemics driven by late disease stage transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:241-253.
4. Xiridou M, Geskus R, de Wit J, Coutinho R, Kretzschmar M. Primary HIV infection as source of HIV transmission within steady and casual partnerships among homosexual men. AIDS. 2004;18:1311-1320.
5. Kretzschmar M, Dietz K. The effect of pair formation and variable infectivity on the spread of an infection without recovery. Math Biosci. 1998;148:83-113.
6. Pinkerton SD. Probability of HIV transmission during acute infection in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:677-684.
7. Wawer MJ, Gray RH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1403-1409.
8. Kretzschmar M, Morris M. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math Biosci. 1996;133:165-195.
9. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and transmission dynamics in networks. Soc Net. 1995;17:299-318.
10. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641-648.
11. Abu-Raddad LJ, Longini IM Jr. No HIV stage is dominant in driving the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2008;22:1055-1061.
12. Pinkerton SD. How many sexually-acquired HIV infections in the USA are due to acute-phase HIV transmission? AIDS (London, England). 2007;21:1625-1629.
13. Hollingsworth TD, Anderson RM, Fraser C. HIV-1 transmission, by stage of infection. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:687-693.
14. Dietz K, Hadeler KP. Epidemiological models for sexually transmitted diseases. J Math Biol. 1988;26:1-25.
15. Altmann M. Susceptible-infected-removed epidemic models with dynamic partnerships. J Math Biol. 1995;33:661-675.
16. Altmann M. The deterministic limit of infectious disease models with dynamic partners. Math Biosci. 1998;150:153-175.
17. Watts CH, May RM. The influence of concurrent partnerships on the dynamics of HIV/AIDS. Math Biosci. 1992;108:89-104.
18. Chick SE, Adams AL, Koopman JS. Analysis and simulation of a stochastic, discrete-individual model of STD transmission with partnership concurrency. Math Biosci. 2000;166:45-68.
19. Hudson CP. Concurrent partnerships could cause AIDS epidemics. Int J STD AIDS. 1993;4:249-253.
20. Keeling MJ, Eames KT. Networks and epidemic models. J R Soc Interface. 2005;2:295-307.
21. Keeling MJ. The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc Biol Sci. 1999;266:859-867.
22. Keeling M. The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. Theor Popul Biol. 2005;67:1-8.
23. Volz E, Meyers LA. Susceptible-infected-recovered epidemics in dynamic contact networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274:2925-2933.
24. Ghani AC, Swinton J, Garnett GP. The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24: 45-56.
25. Eames KT, Keeling MJ. Modeling dynamic and network heterogeneities in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:13330-13335.
26. Lagarde E, Auvert B, Carael M, et al. Concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV prevalence in five urban communities of sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS. 2001;15:877-884.
27. Xiridou M, Geskus R, de Wit J, Coutinho R, Kretzschmar M. The contribution of steady and casual partnerships to the incidence of HIV infection among homosexual men in Amsterdam. AIDS. 2003;17:1029-1038.
28. Morris M, Kretzschmar M. A microsimulation study of the effect of concurrent partnerships on the spread of HIV in Uganda. Math Popul Stud. 2000;8:109-133.
29. Leclerc PM, Matthews AP, Garenne ML. Fitting the HIV epidemic in Zambia: a two-sex micro-simulation model. PLoS One. 2009;4: e5439.
30. Jones JH, Handcock MS. An assessment of preferential attachment as a mechanism for human sexual network formation. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270:1123-1128.
31. Jones JH, Handcock MS. Social networks: sexual contacts and epidemic thresholds. Nature. 2003;423:605-606.
32. Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LA, Stanley HE, Aberg Y. The web of human sexual networks. Nature. 2001;411:907-908.