Erratum to: Responses of Uniola paniculata L. (Poaceae), an Essential Dune-Building Grass, to Complex Changing Environmental Gradients on the Coastal Dunes (Estuaries and Coasts, 10.1007/s12237-010-9269-2);Responses of Uniola paniculata L. (Poaceae), an Essential Dune-Building Grass, to Complex Changing Environmental Gradients on the Coastal Dunes

Estuaries and Coasts

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1237-1246

  Gormally, Cara L ^a   Donovan, Lisa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coastal sand dunes; Environmental gradients; Intraspecific variation; Nutrients; Phenotypic plasticity; Salinity; Sand accretion and erosion; Uniola paniculata

Indexed keywords

ACCRETION; DUNE; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; GRASS; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SALTMARSH;

UNITED STATES;

POACEAE; UNIOLA PANICULATA;

EID: 77955917459     PISSN: 15592723     EISSN: 15592731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-010-9291-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Barbour, M. G. 1978. Salt spray as a microenvironmental factor in the distribution of beach plants at Point Reyes, California. Oecologia 32: 213-224.
2. Barbour, M. G., T. M. DeJong, et al. 1976. Synecology of beach vegetation along the Pacific Coast of the United States of America: A first approximation. Journal of Biogeography 3: 55-69.
3. Barbour, M. G., T. M. DeJong, et al. 1985. Marine beach and dune plant communities. In Physiological ecology of North American plant communities, ed. B. F. Chabot and H. A. Mooney. New York: Chapman & Hall.
4. Barbour, M. G., M. Rejmanek, et al. 1987. Beach vegetation and plant distribution patterns along the northern Gulf of Mexico. Phytocoenologia 15(2): 201-233.
5. Barbour, M. G., J. H. Burk, et al. (eds.). 1999. Terrestrial plant ecology. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.
6. Boyce, S. G. 1954. The salt spray community. Ecological Monographs 24(1): 29-67.
7. Brown, J. F. 1997. Effects of experimental burial on survival, growth, and resource allocation of three species of dune plants. Journal of Ecology 85: 151-158.
8. Cheplick, G. P., and H. Demetri. 1999. Impact of saltwater spray and sand deposition on the coastal annual Triplasis purpurea (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 703-710.
9. Clements, F. E. 1904. Plant succession, 242. Washington: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication.
10. Cowles, H. C. 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation of the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Botanical Gazette 27: 95-391.
11. Dech, J. P., and M. A. Maun. 2005. Zonation of vegetation along a burial gradient on the leeward slopes of Lake Huron sand dunes. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 227-236.
12. Dilustro, J. J., and F. P. Day. 1997. Aboveground biomass and net primary production along a Virginia barrier island dune chronosequence. American Midland Naturalist 137(1): 27-38.
13. Doing, H. 1985. Coastal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world. Vegetatio 61(1): 65-75.
14. Donovan, L. A., J. H. Richards, et al. 1997. Nutrient relations of the halophytic shrub, Sarcobatus vermiculatus, along a soil salinity gradient. Plant and Soil 190: 105-117.
15. 4sand dune plant species of the Georgia coast, 53. Athens: Department of Botany, University of Georgia.
16. Franks, S. J. 2003. Burial disturbance leads to facilitation among coastal dune plants. Plant Ecology 168: 13-21.
17. Franks, S. J., C. L. Richards, et al. 2004. Multi-scale genetic analysis of Uniola paniculata (Poaceae): A coastal species with a linear, fragmented distribution. American Journal of Botany 91(9): 1345-1351.
18. Griffiths, M. E. 2006. Salt spray and edaphic factors maintain dwarf stature and community composition in coastal sandplain heathlands. Plant Ecology 186: 69-86.
19. Habte, M., and M. Soedarjo. 1995. Limitation of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal activity in Leucaena leucocephala by Ca insufficiency in an acid Mn rich oxisol. Mycorrhiza 5: 387-394.
20. Haines, B. L., and E. L. Dunn. 1985. Coastal marshes. In Physiological ecology of North American plant communities, ed. B. F. Chabot and H. A. Mooney. New York: Chapman & Hall.
21. Houle, G. 1997. Interactions between resources and abiotic conditions control plant performance on subartic coastal dunes. American Journal of Botany 84(12): 1729-1737.
22. Houle, G. 2002. Trade-off between growth ability and stress tolerance in Leymus mollis (Poaceae) along a subarctic coastal dune sequence in northern Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 869-874.
23. Johnson, A. F., and M. G. Barbour. 1990. Dunes and maritime forests. In Ecosystems of Florida, ed. R. L. Myers and J. J. Ewel. Orlando: University of Central Florida.
24. Kawecki, T. J., and D. Ebert. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecology Letters 7: 1225-1241.
25. Knight, T. M., and T. E. Miller. 2004. Local adaptation within a population of Hydrocotyle bonariensis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 103-114.
26. Lambers, H., F. S. C. III, et al. 1998. Plant physiological ecology. New York: Springer.
27. Lane, C., S. J. Wright, et al. 2008. Characterizing environmental gradients and their influence on vegetation zonation in a subtropical coastal sand dune system. Journal of Coastal Research 24(4C): 213-224.
28. Larcher, W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. New York: Springer.
29. Lee, J. A., and R. Ignaciuk. 1985. The physiological ecology of strandline plants. Vegetatio 62: 319-326.
30. Lortie, C. J., and J. H. Cushman. 2007. Effects of a directional abiotic gradient on plant community dynamics and invasion in a coastal dune system. Journal of Ecology 95(3): 468-481.
31. Lubke, R. A. 1983. A survey of the coastal vegetation near Port Alfred, eastern Cape. Bothalia 14(3 & 4): 725-738.
32. Marschner, H. 2002. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. San Diego: Elsevier Academic.
33. Martinez, M. L., and P. Moreno-Casasola. 1996. Effects of burial by sand on seedling growth and survival in six tropical sand dune species from the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Coastal Research 12(2): 406-419.
34. Martinez, M. L., G. Vazquez, et al. 2001. Spatial and temporal variability during primary succession on tropical coastal sand dunes. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 361-372.
35. Maun, M. A., and J. LaPierre. 1984. The effects of burial by sand on Ammophila breviligulata. Journal of Ecology 72: 827-839.
36. Maun, M. A., and J. Perumal. 1999. Zonation of vegetation on lacustrine coastal dunes: Effects of burial by sand. Ecology Letters 2: 14-18.
37. Moreno-Casasola, P. 1986. Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system. Vegetatio 65: 67-76.
38. Moreno-Casasola, P. 1988. Patterns of plant species distributions on coastal dunes along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Biogeography 15: 787-806.
39. Moreno-Casasola, P., and I. Espejel. 1986. Classification and ordination of coastal sand dune vegetation along the Gulf and Caribbean Sea of Mexico. Vegetatio 66: 147-182.
40. Olff, H., J. Huisman, et al. 1993. Species dynamics and nutrient accumulation during early primary succession in coastal sand dunes. Journal of Ecology 81: 693-706.
41. Oosting, H. J., and W. D. Billings. 1942. Factors affecting vegetational zonation on coastal dunes. Ecology 23: 131-142.
42. Orr, M., M. Zimmer, et al. 2005. Wrack deposition on different beach types: Spatial and temporal variation in the pattern of subsidy. Ecology 86(6): 1496-1507.
43. Owen, N. W., M. Kent, et al. 2004. Plant species and community responses to sand burial on the machair of the Outer Hebrides, Scotland. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 669-678.
44. Pemadasa, M. A., and P. H. Lovell. 1974. The mineral nutrition of some dune annuals. Journal of Ecology 62(1): 647-657.
45. Perumal, V. J., and M. A. Maun. 2006. Ecophysiological response of dune species to experimental burial under field and controlled conditions. Plant Ecology 184: 89-104.
46. Pywell, R. F., J. M. Bullock, et al. 2003. Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 40(1): 65-77.
47. Richards, C. L., S. N. White, et al. 2010. Plasticity, not adaptation to salt level, explains variation along a salinity gradient in a salt marsh perennial. Estuaries and Coasts. doi: 10. 1007/s12237-009-9186-4.
48. Robertson, G. P., D. C. Coleman, et al. (eds.). 1999. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Long-term ecological research network series. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Seliskar, D. M. 1994. The effect of accelerated sand accretion on growth, carbohydrate reserves, and ethylene production in Ammophila breviligulata (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 81(5): 536-541.
50. Smith, R. L., and T. M. Smith. 2001. Ecology and field biology. New York: Benjamin Cummings.
51. Stallins, J. A., and A. J. Parker. 2003. The influence of complex systems interactions on barrier island dune vegetation pattern and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 13-29.
52. Sykes, M. T., and J. B. Wilson. 1988. An experimental investigation into the response of some New Zealand sand dune species to salt spray. Annals of Botany 62: 159-166.
53. van der Valk, A. G. 1974a. Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Canadian Journal of Botany 52: 1057-1073.
54. van der Valk, A. G. 1974b. Mineral cycling in coastal foredune plant communities in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Ecology 55: 1349-1358.
55. Wagner, R. H. 1964. The ecology of Uniola paniculata L. in the dune-strand habitat of North Carolina. Ecological Monographs 34: 79-96.
56. Wikelski, M., and S. J. Cooke. 2006. Conservation physiology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(2): 38-46.
57. Willis, A. J. 1963. Braunton Burrows: The effects on the vegetation of the addition of mineral nutrients to the dune soils. Journal of Ecology 51: 353-374.
58. Wilson, J. B., and M. T. Sykes. 1999. Is zonation on coastal sand dunes determined primarily by sand burial or by salt spray? A test in New Zealand dunes. Ecology Letters 2: 233-236.
59. Zhang, J., and M. A. Maun. 1992. Effects of burial in sand on the growth and reproduction of Cakile edentula. Ecography 15(3): 296-302.