On the sampling of web images for learning visual concept classifiers

CIVR 2010 - 2010 ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 50-57

  Zhu, Shiai ^a   Wang, Gang ^a,b   Ngo, Chong Wah ^a   Jiang, Yu Gang ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept detection; Sampling; Web images

Indexed keywords

CO-OCCURRENCE; CONCEPT DETECTION; CONCEPT LEARNING; EXTERNAL SOURCES; POSITIVE EXAMPLES; SEMANTIC FIELDS; SIMPLE APPROACH; SOCIAL MEDIA; TARGET CONCEPT; TRAINING DATA; TRAINING EXAMPLE; TRAINING IMAGE; TRAINING SAMPLE; VISUAL CONCEPT; VISUAL CONCEPT LEARNING; WEB IMAGES; WIKIPEDIA; WORDNET;

OCEANOGRAPHY;

WEBSITES;

EID: 77955896356     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1816041.1816051     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. M. Ames and M. Naaman. Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In ACM SIGCHI, 2007.
2. A. Ulges et al. Learning automatic concept detectors from online video. Comput. Vis. Image Understand, 2009.
3. D. Liu et al. Tag ranking. In ACM WWW, 2009.
4. G.-J. Qi et al. Transductive inference with hierarchical clustering for video annotation. In ICME, 2007.
5. J. Tang et al. Inferring semantic concepts from community-contributed images and noisy tags. In ACM MM, 2009.
6. K. Bischoff et al. Can all tags be used for search. In ACM CIKM, 2008.
7. Q. Tian et al. A new analysis of the value of unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning for image retrieval. In ICME, 2004.
8. S.-F. Chang et al. Columbia University/VIREO-CityU/IRIT TRECVID 2008 high-level feature extraction and interactive video search. In TRECVID, 2008.
9. T.-S. Chua et al. NUS-WIDE: A real-world web image database from national university of singapore. In CIVR, 2009.
10. Y.-G. Jiang et al. Representations of keypoint-based semantic concept detection: A comprehensive study. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia, 12(1):42-53, 2010.
11. Y.-G. Jiang, C.-W Ngo, and J. Yang. Towards optimal bag-of-features for object categorization and semantic video retrieval. In CIVR, 2007.
12. D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin. Speech and language processing. Prentice-Hall, 2000.
13. L. S. Kennedy, S.-F. Chang, and I. V. Kozintsev. To search or to label. In ACM MIR, 2006.
14. L.-J. Li and L. Fei-Fei. OPTIMOL: automatic object picture collection via incremental model learning. Int. J. of Computer Vision, 2009.
15. X.-R. Li and C. G. M. Snoek. Visual categorization with negative examples for free. In ACM MM, 2009.
16. X.-R. Li, C. G. M. Snoek, and M. Worring. Learning social tag relevance by neighbor voting. IEEE Trans. on MM, 11(7):1310-1322, 2009.
17. M. R. Naphade and J. R. Smith. On the detection of semantic concepts at TRECVID. In ACM MM, 2004.
18. G. Quénot and S. Ayache. TRECVID 2009 collaborative annotation. http://mrim.imag.fr/tvca/.
19. F. Schroff, A. Criminisi, and A. Zisserman. Harvesting image databases from the web. In ICCV, 2007.
20. A. T. Setz and C. G. M. Snoek. Can social tagged images aid concept-based video search. In ICME, 2009.
21. S. Tong and E. Chang. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In ACM MM, 2001.
22. G. Wang, T.-S. Chua, and M. Zhao. Exploring knowledge of sub-domain in a multi-resoluation bootstrapping framework for concept detection in news. In ACM MM, 2008.
23. R. Yan, A. G. Hauptmann, and R. Jin. Negative pseudo-relevance feedback in content-based video retrieval. In ACM MM, 2003.
24. R. Yan and M. R. Naphade. Semi-supervised cross feature learning for semantic concept detection in video. In CVPR, 2005.