Female feticide in India

Issues in Law and Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 13-29

  Ahmad, Nehaluddin ^a   Darussalam, Brunei ^b  

^a Sultan Sharif Ali Islamic University   (Malaysia)

^b MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIA; INDUCED ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; SEX DETERMINATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE;

ABORTION, INDUCED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; INFANT, NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS); SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SEX DETERMINATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 77955879095     PISSN: 87568160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Celia de Lamo, Reports From a Village in India Where Newborn Girls Are Killed to Stop Them Being a Financial Burden on Their Families, LONDONTIMES (U.K.), Mar. 12, 1997, at 11;"
2. see also, UNESCO Institute for Statistics - UIS/FS/08/01.
3. Fred Arnold et al., Son Preference, the Family-Building Process and Child Mortality in India, 52 POPULATION STUDIES 301 (Nov. 1998).
4. MANU: Laws of Manu (Manu Dharma Shastras) written between 200 B.C.E. and 200 CE.; its 2,685 verses codify cosmogony, four ashramas, government, domestic affairs, caste and morality. For dating of composition "between the second century B.C.E. and third century C.E.,"
5. see FLOOD, AN INTRODUCTION TO HINDUISM 56 (1996). For dating of Manu Smriti in "final form" to the second century C.E.,
6. see JOHN KEAY, INDIA: A HISTORY 103 (2000). For dating as completed some time between 200 B.C.E. and 100 C.E.,
7. see THOMAS J. HOPKINS, THE HINDU RELIGIOUS TRADITION 74 (1971). For probable origination during the second or third centuries C.E.,
8. see HERMANN KULKE & DIETMAR ROTHERMUND, A HISTORYOF INDIA 85 (1986). For the text as preserved dated to around the ist century B.C.E.,
9. see http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/363055/Manu-smrti (accessed on Apr. 11, 2010).
10. Sharma Chetan & Rita Patel, The Practice of Sex Selective Abortion Technology and its Impact on Female Feticide in India, JAIN DIVYA, May 2005, at 286.
11. L. Visaria, Deficit of Women in India: Magnitude, Trends, Regional Variations and Determinants, 15 NAT'L MED. J. INDIA 19 (2002).
12. R. MUTHULAKSHMI, FEMALE INFANTICIDE, ITS CAUSES AND SOLUTIONS 92 (Discovery Pub. House, New Delhi, 1997).
13. Id. at 92-93.
14. RITA PATEL, THE PRACTICE OF SEX SELECTIVE ABORTION IN INDIA, MAY YOU BE THE MOTHER OF A HUNDRED SONS 67 (1996).
15. R. J. RUMMEL, DEATH BY GOVERNMENT 65-66 (1986).
16. Id. at 66-67.
17. Id. at 67.
18. Malvica Karlekar, The Girl Child in India: Does She Have Any Right? 15 CAN. WOMAN'S STUD. 55-56 (1995).
19. Id. at 56-57.
20. Kishor, "May God Give Sons to All": Genderand ChildMortality in India, 58 AM. SOC. REV. 262 (Apr. 1993).
21. SONALDE DEBAI, GENDER INEQUALITIES AND DEMOGRAPHIC BEHAVIOR: INDIA 166 (Population Council, Inc., N.Y., 1994).
22. Zeng Yi et al, Causes and Implications of the Recent Increase in the Reported Sex Ratio at Birth in China, 19 POPULATION & DEV. REV. 297 (June 1993).
23. Dutta's Subhabrate, Child Sex Ratio - The Grim Picture, in SOCIAL WELFARE 17-18, 23-24 (Nov. 2001).
24. Kishor, supra note 14, at 263-64.
25. P.M. Manmohan Singh's Independence Day speech, New Delhi Female Foeticide a Shame for India, PRESS TRUST OF INDIA, Aug. 15, 2009, available at http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/female-foeticide-a-shame-for-india-pm.php (accessed on Apr. 10, 2010).
26. Amniocentesis, also referred to as amniotic fluid test or AFT, is a medical procedure used in parental diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities and fetal infections.
27. Chorionic villus sampling or CVS, also known as chorionic villus biopsy, is a prenatal test that can detect genetic and chromosomal abnormalities of an unborn baby.
28. A test in which sound waves are used to examine internal structures. During pregnancy it can be used to examine the fetus.
29. See V. PATEL, INDIAN WOMEN 16-17 (Bombay, 1996).
30. Id. at 17.
31. R. Jeffery & P. Jeffery, Female Infanticide and Amniocentesis, 19 Soc. Sci. & MED. 1207 (1984).
32. Z. Imam, India Bans Female Feticide, 308 BRIT. MED. J. 428 (1994).
33. Id. at 428-29.
34. V. G. Julie, Will India's Ban on Prenatal Sex Determination Slow Abortion of Girls? HINDUISM TODAY (Am. ed.), Apr., 1996, at 7.
35. R. P. Ravindra, Campaign Against Sex Determination Tests, 8 LOKAYAN BULL. 31 (1990).
36. Tim Dyson, The Preliminary Demography of the 2001 Census of India, 27 POPULATION & DEV. REV. 341 (2001).
37. BBC, Jan. 9, 2006, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south-asia/ 4592890.stm (accessed on Apr. 10, 2010) (Their research was based on a national survey of 1.1 million households in 1998).
38. John-Thor Dahlburg, Where Killing Baby Girls "is No Big Sin, "TORONTO STAR , Feb. 28, 1994, at 13.
39. Julie, supra note 27.
40. Renu Dube, Reena Dube & Rashmi Bhatnagar, Women Without Choice: Female Infanticide and the Rhetoric of Overpopulation in Postcolonial India, WOMEN'S STUD. Q., Spr./Sum. 1999, at 73.
41. Sarah Boseley, Health Ed., 10 Million Girl Foetuses Aborted in India, GUARDIAN, Jan. 9, 2006;
42. see also http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/09/india.sarahboseley (accessed on Apr. 10, 2010).
43. OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERALAND CENSUS COMMISSIONER, CENSUS 2001, GOV'T OF INDIA (hereinafter "CENSUS 2001").
44. Masen Stephan & Wink Claudia, A Turning Point in Gender Bias in Mortality? An Update on the Number of Missing Women, 28 POPULATION & DEV. REV. 285 (2002).
45. Pande Rohini & Malhotra Anju, Son Preference and Daughter Neglect in India, What Happens to Living Girls? ICRW (2006), available at www.icrw.org/docs/2006.
46. L. VISARIA, SEX-SELECTIVE ABORTION IN THE STATES OF GUJARAT AND HARYANA: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE 64-83 (Abortion Assessment Project of India: Qualitative Studies, Health Watch Trust, Jaipur and CEHAT, Mumbai 2004);
47. see also CENSUS 2001, supra note 35.
48. VISARIA, supra note 38.
49. Monia Das Gupta & P. N. Mari Bhat, Fertility Decline and Increased Manifestation of Sex Bias in India, 51 POPULATION STUD. 307 (1997).
50. Id.
51. Kusum, The Use of Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques for Sex Selection: The Indian Scene, 7 BIOETHICS 149 (1993);
52. see also J. Venkatesan, Enforce Ban on Sex Determination, HINDUSTAN TIMES, May 6, 2003, at 7.
53. Dutta Subhabrate, Child Sex Ratio-The Grim Picture, SOC. WELFARE, Nov. 2001, at 17-18, 23-24.
54. Pre-natal Diagnostics Techniques Act, Regulation and Prevention of Misuse (1994).
55. T. Kanitkar, The Sex Ratio in India: A Topic of Speculation and Research, 39 J. FAM. WELFARE 19 (1993).
56. Pande Mrinal, A Price for Life, HINDU SUNDAY MAG., Feb. 3, 2002, at 10.
57. Aditya Ghosh, HINDUSTAN TIMES, NOV. 24, 2008, at 17.
58. Jonathan Manthorpe, China Battles Slave Trading in Women: Female Infanticide Fuels a Brisk Trade in Wives, VANCOUVER SUN, Jan. 11, 1999, at 11.
59. Tina Rosenberg, The Daughter Deficit, N.Y. TIMES MAG., Aug. 23, 2009, at 23: [I]n India and China the situation is dire: in those countries, more than 1.5 million fewer girls are born each year than demographics would predict, and more girls die before they turn 5 than would be expected. (In China in 2007, there were 17.3 million births -and a million missing girls.) Millions more grow up stunted, physically and intellectually, because they are denied the health care and the education that their brothers receive.
60. Mrinal, supra note 46.
61. M. Kaur, Female Foeticide - A Sociological Perspective, 39 J. FAM. WELFARE 40 (1993).
62. M. L. Solapurkar & R. N. Sangam, Has the MTP Act in India Proven Beneficial? 38 J. FAM. WELFARE 46 (1992).
63. Id. at 48-49.
64. S. V. Subramanian & S. Selvaraj, Social Analysis of Sex Imbalance in India: Before and After the Implementation of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act, 63 J. EPIDEMIOLOGY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 245 (2009).
65. Sabu George, Female Foeticide in India, 13 HEALTH ACTION 23 (2000).
66. Subramanian & Selvaraj, supra note 54, at 249.
67. J. F. Burns, India Fights Abortion of Female Fetuses, N. Y. TIMES, Aug. 27, 1994,at 5.
68. Id. at 5.
69. Subramanian & Selvaraj, supra note 54, at 250.
70. Id.
71. Editorial, HINDUSTAN TIMES (Nat'1 Daily), Dec. 11, 2007, at 16.
72. G. Singh & S. Jain, Opinions of Men and Women Regarding Amniocentesis, 39 J. FAM. WELFARE 13 (1993).
73. Id. at 18.
74. Gautam Chikermane, To Save the Girl Child Invest, INDIAN EXPRESS (Nat'l Daily), Mar. 30, 2006, at 13.
75. J. P. Singh, Social and Cultural Aspects of Gender Inequality and Discrimination in India, 30 ASIAN PROFILE 163 (2002).
76. J. P. Singh, Dowry in India: A Search for New Social Identity, 58 EASTERN ANTHROPOLOGIST 199-220 (2005).
77. Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes [CEHAT] v. Union of India. AIR 2001 SC 2007.
78. Surya Deva, Public Interest Litigation in India: A Critical Review, 28 CIVIL JUST. Q. 19 (2009).
79. Pamela Philipose, Women Versus Girls, INDIAN EXPRESS (Nat'l Daily), Apr. 5, 2006, at 5.
80. Gender Laws Often Go Against Women, TIMES NEWS NETWORK, Jul. 24, 2006, at 7.
81. Nandita Haksar, Dominance, Suppression and the Law, in WOMEN AND THE LAW, CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 89 (Lotoka Sarkar & B. Sivaramayya, eds., Vikas Pub. House, New Delhi, 1994).