A prospective comparison of video colonoscopy and CT colonography in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal cancer;CT-kolonographie versus videokoloskopie zum nachweis kolorektaler läsionen in der vorsorgepopulation

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 135, Issue 34-35, 2010, Pages 1656-1661

  Juchems, M ^a   Rompp A ^a   Kestler, H A ^a,b   Ernst, A ^a   Brambs, H J ^a   Adler, G ^a   Aschoff, A ^c   Wagner, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c Klinikum Kempten Oberallgau   (Germany)

Author keywords

cancer screening program; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer prevention; colorectal polyps; CT colonography

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEO COLONOSCOPY; VIDEORECORDING;

ADENOMA; AGED; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77955876003     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: 14394413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262457     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aldridge A J., Simson J N. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001 167 777-781
2. Brenner H, Haug U, Arndt V et al. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2010 138 870-876
3. Hardcastle J D., Chamberlain J O., Robinson M H. et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996 348 1472-1477
4. Heresbach D. Colonoscopy, tumors, and inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy 2008 40 147-151
5. Hoff G, Dominitz J A. Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? Gut 2010 59 407-414
6. Juchems M S., Ehmann J, Brambs H J., Aschoff A J. A retrospective rvaluation of patient acceptance of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) in comparison to conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population. Acta Radiol 2005 46 664-670
7. Juchems M S., Ernst A S., Sheafor D H. et al. CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population. Rofo 2009 181 573-578
8. Juchems M S., Fleiter T R., Pauls S et al. CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 2006 16 68-72
9. Kim S H., Lee J M., Eun H W. et al. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 2007 244 852-864
10. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen O D., Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996 348 1467-1471
11. Mück K. Radioaktivität und Strahlung in unserer Umwelt. Die Strahlenexposition des Österreichers. Seibersdorf, Austrian Research Centers. 2001
12. Parkin D M., Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005 55 74-108
13. Pickhardt P J., Kim D H. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 40-46
14. Ransohoff D F., Sandler R S. Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 346 40-44
15. Rex D K., Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007 133 42-47
16. Rex D K., Johnson D A., Anderson J C. et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 739-750
17. Rex D K. PRO: Patients with polyps smaller than 1cm on computed tomographic colonography should be offered colonoscopy and polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 100 1903-1905; discussion 19071908
18. Ristvedt S L., McFarland E G., Weinstock L B., Thyssen E P. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 578-585
19. Rockey D C., Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005 365 305-311
20. Stryker S J., Wolff B G., Culp C E. et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987 93 1009-1013
21. Taylor S A., Laghi A, Lefere P et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007 17 575-579
22. Vining D J. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Radiology 1996 200 30-31
23. Winawer S J., Fletcher R H., Miller L et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997 112 594-642
24. Zalis M E., Barish M A., Choi J R. et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005 236 3-9