Motivational mechanisms at the origin of control task violations: An analytical case study in the pharmaceutical industry

Ergonomics

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1076-1084

  Nyssen, Anne Sophie ^a   Côte, Virginie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cognitive and social rationality; Risk perception; Safety; Violations

Indexed keywords

CONTROL TASK; FREQUENCY OF ERROR; LINE OPERATORS; PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; RISK SYSTEMS; SAFETY; SAFETY STRATEGY; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL RATIONALITY; VIOLATIONS;

DRUG PRODUCTS; DRUG PRODUCTS PLANTS; RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

ARTICLE; DRUG INDUSTRY; HUMAN; MANPOWER; MEDICATION ERROR; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OBSERVATION; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STANDARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DRUG INDUSTRY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MEDICATION ERRORS; MOTIVATION; OBSERVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 77955869766     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.505301     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amalberti, R., 1996. La conduite des systèmes à risques. Paris: PUF.
2. Aslanides, M., et al., 2007. The evolution of error and violation descriptions in French air force accident reports: The impacts of human factors education. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 6 (1), 51-70.
3. Besnard, D. and Greathead, D., 2003. A cognitive approach to safe violations. Cognition Technology and Work, 5, 272-282.
4. Blockey, P.N. and Hartley, L.R., 1995. Aberrant behaviour: errors and violations. Ergonomics, 38 (9), 1759-1771.
5. Bourrier, M., 1999. Le nucléaire à l'épreuve de l'organisation. Paris: PUF, Le travail humain.
6. de Brito, G. and Veyrac, H., 1997. Categorisation des representations du prescrit et du non-respect des procedures. In: Proceedings of the XXXII symposium of the Société d'Ergonomie de Langue Française, 17-19 September, Lyon, France. Toulouse: Octares, 115-124.
7. Dejours, C., 1996. Prescription, transgression et souffrance dans le travail. In: J. Girin and M. Grosjean, eds. La transgression des règles au travail. Paris: L'Harmattan, Collection Language & Travail, 107-117.
8. de Terssac, G., 1992. Autonomie dans le travail. Paris: PUF.
9. de Winter, J.C.F., et al., 2007. Violations and errors during simulation-based driver training. Ergonomics, 50 (1), 138-158.
10. Glendon, A., 2007. Driving violations observed: An Australian study. Ergonomics, 50 (8), 1159-1182.
11. Kontogiannis, T., Kossiavelou, Z., and Marmaras, N., 2002. Self-reports of aberrant behavior on the roads: errors and violations in a sample of Greek drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 381-399.
12. Lawton, R., 1998. Not Working to Rule: Understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science, 28 (2), 77-95.
13. Lawton, R. and Parker, D., 1999. Procedures and the professional: the case of the British NHS. Social Science and Medicine, 48 (3), 353-361.
14. Leplat, J., 1998. About implementation of safety rules. Safety Science, 29, 189-204.
15. Lindroos, O., 2009. Relationship between observed and perceived deviations from normative work procedures. Ergonomics, 52 (12), 1487-1500.
16. Mayen, P. and Vidal-Gomel, C., 2005. Conception, formation et developpement des regles au travail. In: P. Rabardel and P. Pastre, eds. Modèles du sujet pour la conception. Toulouse: Octares, 108-128.
17. Mesken, J., Lajunen, T., and Summula, H., 2002. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation to accident involvement in Finland. Ergonomics, 45, 469-483.
18. Norman, M.G. and Thanisch, P., 1993. Models of machines and computation for mapping in multicomputers. ACM Computing Surveys, 25 (3), 263-302.
19. Paries, J., 2007. Securite et facteurs organisationnels et humains dans les transports. Communication au Séminaire International: Sécurité et Sûreté de l'Exploitation Ferroviaire. Rabat: Maroc, Avril.
20. Parker, D., et al., 1995. Driving error, driving violations and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38, 1036-1048.
21. Phipps, D., et al., 2008. Identifying violation-provoking conditions in a healthcare setting. Ergonomics, 51 (11), 1625-1642.
22. Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., and Wieringa, P., 2002. Theory of safety violation of system barriers. Cognition, Technology and Work, 4 (3), 171-179.
23. Reason, J., 1990. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Reason, J., 2008. The human contribution. Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
25. Reason, J., et al., 1990. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 33 (10-11), 1315-1332.
26. Rimmo, P., 2002. Aberrant driving behaviour: homogeneity of a four factor structure in samples differing in age and in gender. Ergonomics, 45 (8), 569-582.
27. Sullman, M.J.M., Meadows, M.L., and Pajo, K.B., 2002. Aberrant driving behaviour amongst New Zealand truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 5, 217-252.
28. Stradling, S., 2007. Car driver speed choice in Scotland. Ergonomics, 50 (8), 1196-1208.
29. Vaughan, D., 1999. The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25,271-305.
30. Weick, K.E., 1993. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.