Beam damage detection using computer vision technology

Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 189-204

  Shi, Jing ^a   Xu, Xiangjun ^a   Wang, Jialai ^b   Li, Gong ^a  

^a North Dakota State University   (United States)

^b Univ of Alabama   (United States)

Author keywords

computer vision; damage detection; fractal dimension; roughness analysis; wavelet transform

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION TECHNOLOGY; DETECTION SIGNAL; ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; NEW APPROACHES; NOISE LEVELS; PROFILE ANALYSIS; REMOTE MONITORING; ROUGHNESS ANALYSIS; STATIC DEFORMATIONS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CAMERAS; CANTILEVER BEAMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER VISION; CRACKS; DEFORMATION; FRACTAL DIMENSION; LOCATION; NANOCANTILEVERS; PARTIAL DISCHARGES; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; WAVELET TRANSFORMS; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 77955866896     PISSN: 10589759     EISSN: 14772671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10589750903242525     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. S.W. Doebling, C.R. Farrar, and B. Prime, A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods, Shock Vib. Dig. 30(2) (1998), pp. 91-105.
2. A.B. Stanbridge and D.J. Ewins, Modal testing using a scanning laser vibrometer, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 13 (1999), pp. 255-270.
3. M. Rucka and K. Wilde, Crack identification using wavelets on experimental static deflection profiles, Eng. Struct. 28 (2006), pp. 279-288.
4. H. Yamashina and S. Okumura, A machine vision system for measuring wear and chipping of drilling tools, J. Intell. Manuf. 7 (1996), pp. 319-327.
5. R. Edwards, C.P.L. Barkan, and J.M. Hart, Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of railcar safety appliance inspection using machine vision technology, in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference, 2-4 April 2006, Atlanta, Georgia, 2006, pp. 81-89.
6. T.G. Chondros, A.D. Dimagoras, and J. Yao, A continuous cracked beam vibration theory, J. Sound Vib. 215 (1998), pp. 17-34. (Pubitemid 128381306)
7. C.R. Farrar, S.W. Doebling, P.J. Cornwell, and E.G. Straser, Variability of mode parameters measured on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge, in Proceedings of 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, 3-6 February, 1997, pp. 257-263.
8. S.W. Doebling, C.R. Farrar, and R.S. Goodma, Effects of measurement statistics on the detection of damage in the Alamosa Canyon Bridge, in Proceedings of 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, 3-6 February, 1997, pp. 919-929.
9. T.J. Kim, Y.R. Ryu, H.M. Cho, and N. Stubbs, Damage identification in beam-type structures: Frequency-based method vs. mode-shape based method, Eng. Struct. 25 (2003), pp. 57-67.
10. C. Surace and R. Ruotolo, Crack detection of a beam using the wavelet transform, in Proceedings of 12th International Modal Analysis Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 31 January- 3 February, 1994, pp. 1141-1147.
11. W.J. Wang and P.D. McFadden, Application of orthogonal wavelets to early gear damage detection, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 9 (1996), pp. 497-508.
12. S. Quek, Q. Wang, L. Zhang, and K. Ang, Sensitivity analysis of crack detection in beams by the wavelet technique, J. Mech. Sci. 43 (2001), pp. 2899-2910.
13. J.C. Hong, Y.Y. Kim, H.C. Lee, and Y.W. Lee, Damage detection using the Lipschitz exponent estimated by the wavelet transform: Applications to vibration modes of a beam, Int. J. Solids Struct. 39 (2002), pp. 1803-1816.
14. E. Douka, S. Loutridis, and A. Trochidis, Crack identification in beams using wavelet analysis, Int. J. Solids Struct. 40 (2003), pp. 3557-3569.
15. L.J. Hadjileontiadis, E. Douka, and A. Trochidis, Fractal dimension analysis for crack identification in beam structures, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 19 (2005), pp. 659-674.
16. J. Wang, Damage detection in beams by roughness analysis, in Smart Structures and Materials 2006: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, Proceedings of the SPIE, 6174, 2006, pp. 488-499.
17. C.P. Ratcliffe, Damage detection using a modified Laplacian operator on mode shape data, J. Sound Vib. 204(3) (1997), pp. 505-517.
18. PPT VISION, Inc., IMPACT Inspection Builder Reference Guide, 2005. Eden Prairie, MN: PPT Vision, Inc.
19. R. Esteller, G. Vachtsevanos, J. Echauz, and B. Litt, A comparison of fractal dimension algorithms using synthetic and experimental data, in Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 30 May-2 June 1999, Orlando, Florida, 1999, pp. 199-202.
20. M. Katz, Fractals and the analysis of waveforms, Comput. Biol. Med. 18 (1988), pp. 145-156.
21. I. Debauchies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics), SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1992.
22. Q. Wang and X. Deng, Damage detection with spatial wavelets, Int. J. Solids Struct. 36 (1999), pp. 3443-3468.