Beyond health information technology: Critical factors necessary for effective diabetes disease management

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 452-460

  Ciemins, Elizabeth L ^a   Coon, Patricia J ^a   Fowles, Jinnet Briggs ^b   Min, Sung Joon ^c  

^a BILLINGS CLINIC   (United States)

^b PARK NICOLLET INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic disease management; Diabetes; EHR; Health information technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REGISTER; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONTANA; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; REGISTRIES; WORKFLOW;

EID: 77955855356     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300308     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes 2007 fact sheet [cited 2009 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs- 2007.pdf.
2. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(3):596-615.
3. Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, Thompson TJ. Impact of recent increase in incidence on future diabetes burden: U.S., 2005-2050. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(9):2114-6.
4. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: the AACE system of intensive diabetes self-management - 2002 update. Endocr Pract. 2002;8:40-82.
5. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 1:S13-61.
6. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2643-53.
7. Lifetime benefits and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. JAMA. 1996;276(17):1409-15.
8. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.
9. Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, Ferris FL 3rd, Canner JK, Greenfield S. Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(8):909-17.
10. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703-13.
11. Pogach L, Engelgau M, Aron D. Measuring progress toward achieving hemoglobin A1c goals in diabetes care: pass/fail or partial credit. JAMA. 2007;297(5):520-3.
12. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291(3):335-42.
13. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, Grimshaw JM, Sundaram V, Rushakoff RJ, Owens DK. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296(4):427-40.
14. Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA, DiCicco-Bloom B, Shaw E, Orzano AJ, Crabtree BF. Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(3):209-15.
15. Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG, Stello B, Crabtree BF. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):307-11.
16. Green CJ, Fortin P, Maclure M, Macgregor A, Robinson S. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: necessary but not sufficient. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(12):818-28.
17. O'Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ, Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):300-6.
18. Orzano AJ, Strickland PO, Tallia AF, Hudson S, Balasubramanian B, Nutting PA, Crabtree BF. Improving outcomes for high-risk diabetics using information systems. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(3):245-51.
19. Kupersmith J, Francis J, Kerr E, Krein S, Pogach L, Kolodner RM, Perlin JB. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(2):w156-68.
20. Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42(1):121-30.
21. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 1:S62-7.
22. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383-93.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes, data & trends, national data, preventive care practices. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 1994-2005. Available from: www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics.
24. Hoerger TJ, Segel JE, Gregg EW, Saaddine JB. Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults? Diabetes Care. 2008;31(1):81-6.
25. Fowles J, Kind EA, Awwad S, Weiner JP, Chan KS. Performance measures using electronic health records: five case studies. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2008.
26. Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Imperatore G, Narayan KM. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(7):465-74.