Axial solutions for multiple objective linear problems. An application to target setting in DEA models with preferences

Omega

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 159-167

  Hinojosa, M A ^a   Marmol A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

DEA; Multiple objective linear problems; Partial information

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955845114     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. André F.J. Indirect elicitation of non-linear multi-attribute utility functions. A dual procedure combined with DEA. Omega 2009, 37:883-895.
2. André F.J., Herrero I., Riesgo L. A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics. Omega 2010, 38:371-382.
3. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30:1078-1092.
4. Chankong V., Haimes Y.Y. Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology 1983, North-Holland.
5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Huang Z.M., Sun D.B. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 46:73-91.
7. Chun Y. The proportional solution for rights problems. Mathematical Social Sciences 1988, 15:231-246.
8. Cooper W.W. Origins, uses of, and relations between goal programming and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 2005, 13:3-11.
9. Doyle J., Green R. Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making. Omega 1993, 21(6):713-715.
10. Dyson R.G., Thanassoulis E. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1988, 39(6):563-576.
11. Golany B., Roll Y.A. Incorporating standards via DEA. Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications 1994, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, L.M. Seiford (Eds.).
12. Halme M., Joro T., Korhonen P., Salo S., Wallenius J. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1999, 45:103-115.
13. Halme M., Korhonen P. Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2000, 126:175-188.
14. Hansen P., Labbe M., Wendell R.E. Sensitivity analysis in multiple objective linear programming. The tolerance approach. European Journal of Operational Research 1989, 38(1):63-69.
15. Hinojosa MA, Mármol AM. Egalitarianism and utilitarianism in multiple criteria decision problems with partial information. Group Decision and Negotiation 2010; doi:. http://www.10.1007/s10726-009-9184-8.
16. Kalai E. Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 1977, 45(7):1623-1630.
17. Mármol A.M., Puerto J. Special cases of the tolerance approach in multiobjective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research 1997, 98(3):610-616.
18. Mármol A.M., Puerto J., Fernández F.R. Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 137:123-133.
19. Podinovski V.V. Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 2004, 55:1311-1322.
20. Stewart T.J. Relationships between data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1996, 47:654-665.
21. Stewart T.J. Goal directed benchmarking for organizational efficiency. Omega 2010, 38:534-539.
22. Thompson R.G., Singleton F.D., Thrall R.M., Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 1986, 16:35-49.
23. Weber M. Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research 1987, 28:44-57.
24. Wendell R.E. The tolerance approach to sensitivity analysis in linear programming. Management Science 1985, 31(5):564-578.
25. Wendell R.E. Tolerance sensitivity and optimality bounds in linear programming. Management Science 2004, 50(6):797-803.
26. Yang J.B., Wong B.Y., Xu D.L., Stewart T.J. Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP problems. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 195:205-222.