Increased sequence conservation of domain repeats in prokaryotic proteins

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 383-387

  Reshef, Dan ^a   Itzhaki, Zohar ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARCHEAN; BACTERIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SHORT SURVEY;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 77955842416     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.06.003     Document Type: Short Survey

References (30)

1. Apic G., et al. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 310:311-325.
2. Moore A.D., et al. Arrangements in the modular evolution of proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33:444-451.
3. Wright C.F., et al. The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins. Nature 2005, 438:878-881.
4. Steward A., et al. Sequence conservation in Ig-like domains: the role of highly conserved proline residues in the fibronectin type III superfamily. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 318:935-940.
5. Andre I., et al. Emergence of symmetry in homooligomeric biological assemblies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:16148-16152.
6. Lukatsky D.B., et al. Structural similarity enhances interaction propensity of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365:1596-1606.
7. Bjorklund A.K., et al. Expansion of protein domain repeats. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2:e114.
8. Javadi Y., Main E.R. Exploring the folding energy landscape of a series of designed consensus tetratricopeptide repeat proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:17383-17388.
9. Cortajarena A.L., et al. Non-random-coil behavior as a consequence of extensive PPII structure in the denatured state. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 382:203-212.
10. Lad Y., et al. Structure of three tandem filamin domains reveals auto-inhibition of ligand binding. EMBO J. 2007, 26:3993-4004.
11. Meena N., et al. Interactions among HAMP domain repeats act as an osmosensing molecular switch in group III hybrid histidine kinases from fungi. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:12121-12132.
12. Hastings P.J., et al. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:551-564.
13. Bayer E.A., et al. The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 58:521-554.
14. Aravind L., Ponting C.P. The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 176:111-116.
15. Hulko M., et al. The HAMP domain structure implies helix rotation in transmembrane signaling. Cell 2006, 126:929-940.
16. Finn R.D., et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:D281-D288.
17. Bycroft M., et al. The structure of a PKD domain from polycystin-1: implications for polycystic kidney disease. EMBO J. 1999, 18:297-305.
18. Jing H., et al. Archaeal surface layer proteins contain beta propeller, PKD, and beta helix domains and are related to metazoan cell surface proteins. Structure 2002, 10:1453-1464.
19. Bromham L. Why do species vary in their rate of molecular evolution?. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5:401-404.
20. Ashburner M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:25-29.
21. Li, W.-H. (1997) Concerted evolution of multigene families. In Molecular Evolution (Li, W.-H., ed.), 2nd edn, pp. 309-334, Sinauer Associates.
22. Santoyo G., Romero D. Gene conversion and concerted evolution in bacterial genomes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29:169-183.
23. Shinohara A., Ogawa T. Rad51/RecA protein families and the associated proteins in eukaryotes. Mutat. Res. 1999, 435:13-21.
24. Bzymek M., Lovett S.T. Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: the role of replication in multiple mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:8319-8325.
25. Chevanne D., et al. WD-repeat instability and diversification of the Podospora anserina hnwd non-self recognition gene family. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:134-145.
26. Monsellier E., Chiti F. Prevention of amyloid-like aggregation as a driving force of protein evolution. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8:737-742.
27. Niwa T., et al. Bimodal protein solubility distribution revealed by an aggregation analysis of the entire ensemble of Escherichia coli proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:4201-4206.
28. Chen Y., Dokholyan N.V. Natural selection against protein aggregation on self-interacting and essential proteins in yeast, fly, and worm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1530-1533.
29. Vogel C., et al. Supra-domains: evolutionary units larger than single protein domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 336:809-823.
30. Boeckmann B., et al. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:365-370.