From Incentive to Stewardship: The Shifting Discourse of Academic Publishing

Computers and Composition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 211-224

  Galin, Jeffrey R ^a   Latchaw, Joan ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

Author keywords

Copyright management; Fair use; Fared use; Metaphors; Open access; Ownership and control; Publishing; Stewardship; Tenure and promotion; Unbundling of copyrights

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955841723     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2010.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Armbruster Chris Open access in the natural and social sciences: The correspondence of innovative moves to enhance access, inclusion and impact in scholarly communication. Policy Futures in Education 2008, 6(4):1-22.
2. Association of American Publishers. (2006, May 9). Scholarly publishers oppose senate bill 2695. [Accessed: August 14, 2009] http://www.pspcentral.org/./attachPubAff./senate_bill_press_release.doc.
3. Bell Tom Indelicate imbalancing in copyright and patent law. Copy fights: The future of intellectual property in the information age. 2002, 1-16. Cato Institute, Washington, DC. Adam Thierer, Wayne Crews (Eds.).
4. BioMed Central Blog. (2009, September 21). Five US universities to provide central funding for open access publication fees. [Accessed: October 15, 2009] http://blogs.openaccesscentral.com/blogs/bmcblog/entry/five_us_universities_to_provide.
5. Chilling effects clearinghouse. (2010). Chilling Effects. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.chillingeffects.org/.
6. Complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. (2008). [Accessed: July 3, 2009] http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/georgia/gandce/1:2008cv01425/150651/1/.pdf.
7. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008. Division G, Title II, Section 218 of PL 110-161. [Accessed: October 14, 2009] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-033.html.
8. Cornyn, John, & Lieberman, Joseph. (2006, May 6). Federal research public access act of 2006. [Accessed: August 12, 2009] http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&docid=f:s2695is.txt.pdf.
9. Crawford, Brian. (2006, May 9). AAP-PSP Statement-Cornyn Bill. [Accessed: July 10, 2009] http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0605/msg00067.html.
10. Crews, Kenneth. (2009, May 11). Kenneth Crews on academic copyright. [Accessed: September 15, 2009] http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/05/11/berkman-kenneth-crews-on-academic-copyright/.
11. Galin, Jeffrey, & Latchaw, Joan. (1998). Heterotopic spaces online: A new paradigm for academic scholarship and publication. Kairos: A Journal for Teachers of Writing in Webbed Environments, 3 (1). [Accessed: August 4, 2009] http://english.ttu.edu/KAIROS/3.1/coverweb/galin/index.htm.
12. Gaule, Patrick, & Maystre, Nicolas. (2008). Getting cited: Does open access help? Cemi-Workingpaper-2008-007. [Accessed: August 20, 2009] http://ssm.com/abstract=1427763.
13. Haswell, Rich, & Blalock, Glenn. CompPile 1939-Current. [Accessed: October 15, 2009] http://comppile.org/search/comppile_main_search.php.
14. Hutcheon, Linda. (2006, September 13). What open access could mean for humanities. Open Access News. [Accessed: September 17, 2009] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/09/encouraging-oa-in-humanities.html.
15. Kramer, Roger. Problems with the DMCA. InformITNetwork. [Accessed: August 15, 2009] http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=security&seqNum=117.
16. Latchaw, Joan S., & Galin, Jeffrey R. (1998). Shifting boundaries of intellectual property: Authors and publishers negotiating the WWW. Computers and Composition, 15 (2),145-162.
17. Lessig Lawrence Free culture 2005, Penguin, New York.
18. Litman Jessica Digital copyright 2001, Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY.
19. Logie John Peers, pirates, and persuasion: Rhetoric in the peer-to-peer debates 2006, Parlor Press, West Layfayette, IN.
20. NIH public access policy details. (n.d.). National Institutes of Health Public Health. [Accessed: October 14, 2009] http://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm.
21. Open Access News. (2008, September 30). Law professors defend NIH policy against copyright objections. [Accessed: July 19, 2009] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/09/law-professors-defend-nih-policy.html.
22. Peek, Robin. (2008, September 22). Fair copyright in research works act challenges federal funding. Newsbreaks & the Weekly News Digest. [Accessed: September 4, 2009] http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Fair-Copyright-in-Research-Works-Act-Challenges-Federal-Funding-50849.asp.
23. Reyman Jessica The rhetoric of intellectual property: Copyright law and the regulation of digital culture 2009, Routledge, New York.
24. Seltzer, Wendy. Openlaw: Eldred v. Ashcroft. Berkman Center for Internet & Society. [Accessed: August 12, 2009] http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/eldredvreno/.
25. Senate Report 104-315-Copyright Term Extension Act of 1996. (1996). [Accessed: August 3, 2009] http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/R?cp104:FLD010:@1(sr315).
26. Suber, Peter. (2007, June 19). Open access overview. [Accessed: September 20, 2009] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.
27. Suber, Peter. (2008, September 30). Law professors defend NIH policy against copyright objections. Open Access News. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/09/law-professors-defend-nih-policy.html.
28. Suber, Peter. (2009). The open access movement. Open Access News. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html.
29. The Law: Public Domain: Governement Documents. (2010). Website Copyright. Retrieved July 23, 2010, from http://www.benedict.com/Info/PublicDomain/PublicDomain.aspx.
30. University of California. (2007, February 7). Proposed open access policy. [Accessed: September 20, 2009] http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/underreview/open%20access%20policy0307.pdf.
31. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital eScholarship program. (2007, August). Faculty attitudes and behaviors regarding scholarly communication: Survey findings from the University of California. Reshaping Scholarly Communication. [Accessed: September 19, 2009] http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/materials/OSC-survey-summaries-20070828.pdf.
32. Wallace, Emily Lehr. (2004, October). Special update: Public access to federally funded scientific research. American Geological Institute. [Accessed: August 15, 2009] http://www.agiweb.org/gap/legis108/update_openaccess.html.