Prostate cancer detection after one or more negative extended needle biopsy: Results of a multicenter case-findings protocol

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 95-99

  Pepe, Pietro ^a   Dibenedetto, Giuseppe ^b   Gulletta, Massimo ^c   Pietropaolo, Francesco ^d   Minaldi, Giancarlo ^e   Gulino, Venerando ^f   Barbera, Michele ^g   Rotondo, Salvatore ^h   Azzarello, Guido ⁱ   Amico, Franco ^j   Aragona, Francesco ^a  

^a CANNIZZARO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Ospedale Raimondi   (Italy)

^c Ospedale Cedroni Zodda   (Italy)

^d Ospedale San Raffaele G Giglio   (Italy)

^e Urology Unit   (Italy)

^f Urology Unit   (Italy)

^g Azienda Ospedaliera OCR   (Italy)

^h Azienda Ospedaliera Papardo   (Italy)

ⁱ Policlinico Hospital G Rodolico   (Italy)

^j Urology Unit   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Extended prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Repeat prostate biopsy; Saturation biopsy; TURP

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROSTATE TUMOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77955830298     PISSN: 11243562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Freedland SJ, Partin AW. Prostate-Specific Antigen: Update. Urology 2006; 67:458.
2. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B, Blanc E, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000; 164:393.
3. Puppo P, Introini C, Calvi P, Naselli A. Role of transurethral resection of the prostate and biopsy of the peripheral zone in the same session after repeated negative biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 49:873.
4. Aragona F, Pepe P, Motta M, Saita A, Raciti G, La Rosa P, et al. Incidence of prostate cancer in Sicily: results of a multicenter case-findings protoocol. Eur Urology 2005; 47:569-74.
5. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 1989; 142:71.
6. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50:562.
7. Pepe P, Aragona F. Prostate needle biopsy: 12 vs 18 cores. Is it necessary? Urol Intern 2005; 74:19.
8. Brossner C, Madersbacher S, de Mare P, Ponholzer A, Al-Ali B, Rauchenwald M. Follow-up of men obtaining a six-core versus a ten-core benign prostate biopsy 7 years previousely. World J Urol 2005; 23:419.
9. Jones JS, Patel A, Schoefield L, Rabets JC, Zippe CD, Magi-Galluzzi C. Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006; 175:485.
10. Pepe P, Aragona F. Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation. Urology 2007; 70:1131-35. (Pubitemid 350297372)
11. Yanke BV, Gonen M, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. Validation of nomogram for predicting positive repeat biopsy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2005; 173:421.
12. Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Freschi M, Deho F, Raber M, Briganti A, et al. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on extended prostatic biopsies: predictive factors of cancer detection on repeat biopsies. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2005; 77:31.
13. Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 2005; 1:44.
14. Philip J, Hanchanale V, Foster CS, Javle P. Importance of peripheral biopsies in maximising the detection of early prostate cancer in repeat 12-core biopsy protocol. BJU Int 2006; 98:559.
15. Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, Kadmon D, Miles BJ, Wheeler TM, Slawin KM. Predictors of prostate cancer after initial negative systematic 12 core biopsy. J Urol 2004; 171:1850.
16. Satoh A, Matsumoto K, Nakamura S. Is interval from an initial biopsy a significant predictor of prostate cancer at repeat biopsies? Int J Urol 2006; 13:224.
17. Kawakami S, Okuno T, Yonese J, Igari T, Arai G, Fujii Y, et al. Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analisis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 2007; 51:675.
18. Eskicorapci SY, Guliyey F, Islamoglu E, Ergen A, Ozen H. The effect of prior biopsy scheme on prostate cancer detection for repeat biopsy population: results of the 14-core prostate biopsy technique. Int Urol Nephrol 2006; 139:189.
19. Epstein J, Walsh P, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathological and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of non palpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994; 271:368.
20. Fleshner N, Klotz L. Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases. Urology 2002; 60:93.
21. Walz J, Graefen M, Chun FK, Erbersdobler A, Haese A, Steuber T, et al. High incidence of prostate cancer detected by saturation biopsy after previous negative biopsy series. Eur Urol 2006; 50:498.
22. Rabets JC, Jones JS, Patel A, Zippe CD. Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. J Urol 2004; 172:94.
23. Rodriguez Alonso A, Gonzalez Blanco A, Pita Fernandez S, Suarez Pascual G, Monelli Martin C, Lorenzo Franco J et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using 24 cores extended biopsy. Actas Urol Esp 2005; 29:934.
24. Jones JS, Oder M, Zippe CD. Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office. J Urol 2002; 168:2108.
25. Pelzer AE, Bektic J, Berger AP, Halpern EJ, Kopplestatter F, Klauser A. Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the tyrol screening project. Eur Urol 2005; 48:916.
26. Miyake H, Kurahashi T, Murakami M, Yamanak K, Hara I. Significance of routine transition biopsies in Japanese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Int J Urol 2005; 12:964.
27. Radhakrihnan S, Dorkin TJ, Sheikh N, Greene DR. Role of transition zone sampling by TURP in patients with raised PSA and multiple negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004; 7:338.
28. Zigeuner R, Schips L, Lipsky K, Auprich M, Salfeliner M, Rehak P. Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies. Urology 2003; 62:883.
29. Sakai I, Harada K, Kurahashi T, Yamanaka K, Hara I, Miyake H. Analysis of differences in clinocopathological features between prostate cancers located in the transition and peripheral zones. Int J Urol 2006; 13:368.
30. Capitanio U, Scattoni V, Freschi M, Briganti A, Salonia A, Gallina A et al. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage t1a-t1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence. Eur Urol 2008; 54:118.