Tactile diagrams: Worth ten thousand words?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6170 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 257-263

  Goncu, Cagatay ^a   Marriott, Kim ^a   Aldrich, Frances ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLIND PEOPLE; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; POTENTIAL BENEFITS;

RESEARCH; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 77955799445     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14600-8_25     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65-100 (1987)
2. Shimojima, A.: The graphic-linguistic distinction: Exploring alternatives. Artif. Intell. Rev. 13(4), 313-335 (1999)
3. Tversky, B.: Spatial schemas in depictions. In: Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought, pp. 79-111. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
4. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y.: External cognition: how do graphical representations work? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 45(2), 185-213 (1996)
5. Eriksson, Y.: Tactile Pictures: Pictorial Representations for the Blind, pp. 1784-1940 (1998)
6. Gardner, J., Bulatov, V.: Scientific Diagrams Made Easy with IVEO. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 1243-1250. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) (Pubitemid 44365236)
7. Landau, S., Gourgey, K.: Development of a talking tactile tablet. Information Technology and Disabilities 7(2), 4 (2001)
8. Sheppard, L., Aldrich, F.: Tactile graphics: a beginner's guide to graphics for visually impaired children. Primary Science Review, 29-30 (2000)
9. Lohse, G.L., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., Rueter, H.H.: A classification of visual representations. Commun. ACM 37(12), 36-49 (1994)
10. Aldrich, F.: Talk to the Hand: An Agenda for Further Research on Tactile Graphics. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 344-346. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
11. Challis, B., Edwards, A.: Design principles for tactile interaction. In: Brewster, S., Murray-Smith, R. (eds.) Haptic HCI 2000. LNCS, vol. 2058, pp. 17-24. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
12. Coren, S., Ward, L., Enns, J.: Sensation and perception, Hoboken (2004)
13. Hatwell, Y.: Images and non-visual spatial representations in the blind, pp.13-35, John Libbey Eurotext (1993), Source, http://books.google.com
14. Gibson, J.: The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Greenwood, New York (1966)
15. Klatzky, R., Lederman, S.: The intelligent hand. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 21, 121-151 (1988)
16. Lederman, S., Thorne, G., Jones, B.: Perception of texture by vision and touch: multidimensionality and intersensory integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 12(2), 169-180 (1986)
17. Ungar, S.: Cognitive mapping without visual experience. Kitchin and Freundschuh, 221-248 (2000)
18. Cattaneo, Z., Vecchi, T., Cornoldi, C., Mammarella, I., Bonino, D., Ricciardi, E., Pietrini, P.: Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32(8), 1346-1360 (2008)
19. Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: Visual Information and Valid Reasoning, pp. 9-24 (1991)
20. Sloman, A.: Afterthoughts on analogical representations. In: Proc. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, pp. 164-168. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1975)
21. Thompson, L., Chronicle, E.: Beyond visual conventions: Rethinking the design of tactile diagrams. British Journal of Visual Impairment 24(2), 76 (2006)
22. Schwartz, D.: Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism. Memory and Cognition 23, 709-709 (1995)
23. Suwa, M., Tversky, B.: External representations contribute to the dynamic construction of ideas. In: Hegarty, M., Meyer, B., Narayanan, N.H. (eds.) Diagrams 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2317, pp. 341-343. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
24. Aldrich, F.K., Parkin, A.J.: Tangible line graphs: an experimental investigation of three formats using capsule paper. Human Factors 29(3), 301-309 (1987)
25. Hegarty, M.: Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(5), 1084-1102 (1992)
26. Tufte, E.: The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press (1986)
27. Johnson-Laird, P.: Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1983)
28. Shneiderman, B.: The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. In: Proc. 1996 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1996)
29. Chi, E.: A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data statereference model. In: IEEE Symp. on Information Visualization, pp. 69-75 (2000)
30. Goodman, N.: Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis (1968)
31. Stenning, K., Oberlander, J.: A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science 19(1), 97-140 (1995)