The effects of intervening interference on working memory for sound location as a function of inter-comparison interval

Hearing Research

Volumn 268, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 227-233

  Ries, Dennis T ^a   Hamilton, Traci R ^a   Grossmann, Aurora J ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY ORIENTATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENT; SOUND TRANSMISSION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 77955772491     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anourova I., Rämä P., Alho K., Kiovusalo S., Kahnari J., Carlson S. Selective interference reveals dissociation between memory for location and pitch. Neuroreport 1999, 10:3543-3547.
2. Baddeley A.D., Larsen J. The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a " perceptual-gestural" alternative. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 60:497-504.
3. Baddeley A.D. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Neuroscience 2003, 4:829-839.
4. Bayliss D., Jarrold C., Baddeley A., Gunn D., Leigh E. Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance. Dev. Psychol. 2005, 41:579-597.
5. Clément S., Demany L., Semal C. Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 106:2805-2811.
6. Cowan N. On short and long auditory stores. Psychol. Bull. 1984, 96:341-370.
7. Cowan N., Elliott E., Saults S., Morey C., Mattox S., Hismjatullina A., Conway A. On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn. Psychol. 2005, 51:42-100.
8. Demany L., Ramos C. On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shift in non-perceived pitches. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117:833-841.
9. Demany L., Trost W., Serman M., Semal C. Auditory change detection: simple sounds are not memorized better than complex sounds. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:85-91.
10. Deutsch D. Tones and numbers: specificity of interference in immediate memory. Science 1970, 168:1604-1605.
11. Deutsch D. Mapping of interactions in the pitch memory store. Science 1972, 175:1020-1022.
12. Deutsch D. Effect of repetition of standard and comparison tones on recognition memory for pitch. J. Exp. Psychol. 1972, 93:156-162.
13. Deutsch D. Interference in pitch memory as a function of ear or input. J. Exp. Psychol. 1978, 30:283-287.
14. Durlach N., Braida L. Intensity perception. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1969, 46:372-383.
15. Grantham D.W. Auditory spatial resolution under static and dynamic conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985, 77(Suppl. 1):S50.
16. Grantham D.W. Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1986, 79:1939-1949.
17. Grantham D.W. Auditory motion perception: Snapshots revisited. Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments 1997, 295-313. Laurence Erlbuam Associates, Mahwah. R.H. Gilkey, T.R. Anderson (Eds.).
18. Harris J.D. The decline of pitch discrimination with time. J. Exp. Psychol. 1952, 43:96-99.
19. Hartmann W.M. On the minimum audible angle-A decision theory approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 85:2031-2041.
20. Hartmann W.M. How we localize sound. Phys. Today 1999, 52:24-29.
21. Jump R.J., Ries D.T. Effect of interaural level and phase cues on intervening interference in auditory working memory for loudness. Hear. Res. 2008, 240:112-115.
22. König E. Effect of time on pitch discrimination thresholds under several psychophysical procedures; comparison with intensity discrimination thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1957, 29:606-612.
23. Kuhn G.F. Model for interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1977, 82:157-167.
24. Litovsky R.Y., Macmillan N.A. Sound localization precision under conditions of the precedence effect: effects of azimuth and standard stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 96:752-758.
25. Macpherson E.A., Middlebrooks J.C. Listener weighting of cues for lateral angle: the duplex theory of sound localization revisited. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 111:2219-2236.
26. Martinkauppi S., Rämä P., Aronen H.J., Korvenoja A., Carlson S. Working memory of auditory localization. Cerebr. Cortex 2000, 10:889-898.
27. Massaro D.W. Retroactive interference in short term recognition memory for pitch. J. Exp. Psychol. 1970, 83:32-39.
28. Middlebrooks J., Green D. Sound localization by human listeners. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1991, 42:135-159.
29. Mills A.W. On the minimum audible angles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1958, 30:237-246.
30. Mills A.W. Lateralization of high frequency tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1960, 32:132-134.
31. Perrott D.R., Marlborough K. Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 85:1773-1775.
32. Perrott D.R., Pacheco S. Minimum audible angle thresholds for broadband noise as a function of the delay between the onset of the lead and lag signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 85:2669-2672.
33. Repovs G., Baddeley A.D. The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 2006, 139:5-21.
34. Ries D., DiGiovanni J. Release from interference in auditory working memory for pitch. Hear. Res. 2007, 230:64-72.
35. Ross D.A., Olson I.R., Gore J.C. Absolute pitch does not depend on early musical training. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 999:522-526.
36. Ross D.A., Olson I.R., Marks L.E., Gore J.C. A nonmusical paradigm for identifying absolute pitch possessors. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:1793-1799.
37. Ryan T.A. Comments on orthogonal components. Psychol. Bull. 1959, 56:394-396.
38. Sandel T.T., Teas D.C., Feddersen W.E., Jeffress L.A. Localization of sound from single and paired sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1955, 27:842-852.
39. Stewart J.M., Downs M.P. Medical management of the hearing-handicapped child. Hearing Disorders 1984, 267-278. Little Brown, Boston. second ed. J.L. Northern (Ed.).
40. Turner C.W., Zwislocki J.J., Filion P.R. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:109-115.
41. Vuontela V., Steenari M.R., Carlson S., Koivisto J., Fjällberg M., Aronen E.T. Audiospatial and visuospatial working memory in 6-13 year old school children. Learn. Mem. 2003, 10:74-81.
42. Wightman F.L., Kistler D.J. The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91:1648-1661.
43. Winkler I. Temporary and longer term retention of acoustic information. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(4):530-534.
44. Wright B.A., Fitzgerald M. Different patterns of human discrimination learning for two interaural cues to sound-source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001, 98:12307-12312.
45. Yost W.A. Discriminations of interaural phase differences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1974, 55:1299-1303.
46. Yost W., Dye R. Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 83:1846-1851.