Advancements in molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules on graphical processing units

Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue C, 2010, Pages 2-19

  Xu, Dong ^a,b   Williamson, Mark J ^a   Walker, Ross C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerator; ACEMD; AMBER; ATI; CUDA; GPU; Molecular dynamics; NAMD; NVIDIA; OpenMM; Stream

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955764321     PISSN: 15741400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-1400(10)06001-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. McCammon J.A., Gelin B.R., Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1977, 267:585-590.
2. Duan Y., Kollman P.A. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998, 282:740-744.
3. Yeh I., Hummer G. Peptide loop-closure kinetics from microsecond molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:6563-6568.
4. Klepeis J.L., Lindorff-Larsen K., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:120-127.
5. Sanbonmatsu K.Y., Joseph S., Tung C. Simulating movement of tRNA into the ribosome during decoding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:15854-15869.
6. Freddolino P.L., Arkhipov A.S., Larson S.B., Mcpherson A., Schul-ten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus. Structure 2006, 14:437-449.
7. Bakker A.F., Gilmer G.H., Grabow M.H., Thompson K. A special purpose computer for molecular dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 1990, 90:313-335.
8. Fine R., Dimmler G., Levinthal C. FASTRUN: A special purpose, hardwired computer for molecular simulation. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 1991, 11:242-253.
9. Susukita R., Ebisuzaki T., Elmegreen B.G., Furusawa H., Kato K., Kawai A., Kobayashi Y., Koishi T., McNiven G.D., Narumi T., Yasuoka K. Hardware accelerator for molecular dynamics: MDGRAPE-2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2003, 155:115-131.
10. Case D.A., Darden T.A., Cheatham T.E., Simmerling C.L., Wang J., Duke R.E., Luo R., Crowley M., Walker R.C., Zhang W., Merz K.M., Wang B., Hayik S., Roitberg A., Seabra G., Kolossvary I., Wong K.F., Paesani F., Vanicek J., Wu X., Brozell S.R., Steinbrecher T., Gohlke H., Yang L., Tan C., Mongan J., Hornak V., Cui G., Mathews D.H., Seetin M.G., Sagui C., Babin V., Kollman P.A. AMBER 10 2008, University of California, San Francisco.
11. Case D.A., Cheatham T.E., Darden T., Gohlke H., Luo R., Merz K.M., Onufriev A., Simmerling C., Wang B., Woods R.J. The amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26:1668-1688.
12. Yuri N. Performance analysis of clearspeed's CSX600 interconnects, in Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications. IEEE International Symposium 2009, 203-210.
13. Shaw D.E., Deneroff M.M., Dror R.O., Kuskin J.S., Larson R.H., Salmon J.K., Young C., Batson B., Bowers K.J., Chao J.C., Eastwood M.P., Gagliardo J., Grossman J.P., Ho R.C., Ierardi D.J., Kolossváry I., Klepeis J.L., Layman T., Mcleavey C., Moraes M.A., Mueller R., Priest E.C., Shan Y., Spengler J., Theobald M., Towles B., Wang S.C. Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News 2007, 35:1-12.
14. Narumi T., Ohno Y., Noriyuk F., Okimoto N., Suenaga A., Yanai R., Taiji M. From Computational Biophysics to Systems Biology: A High-Speed Special-Purpose Computer for Molecular Dynamics Simulations: MDGRAPE-3 2006, 29-36. J. von Neumann Institute for Computing, Jülich. J. Meinke, O. Zimmermann, S. Mohanty, U.H.E. Hansmann (Eds.).
15. NVIDIA: Santa Clara, CA, CUDA Programming Guide (Accessed March 6, 2010). http://deve-loper.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/30/toolkit/docs/NVIDIACU-DAProgrammingGuide3.0.pdf.
16. von Neumann J. First draft of a report on the EDVAC. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 1993, 15:27-75.
17. Flynn M.J. Some computer organizations and their effectiveness. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1972, C-21:948-960.
18. Kirk D.B., Hwu W.W. Programming Massively Parallel Processors 2010, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington.
19. Yang J., Wang Y., Chen Y. GPU accelerated molecular dynamics simulation of thermal conductivities. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 221:799-804.
20. AMD: Sunnyvale, CA, ATI, (Accessed March 14, 2010). http://www.amd.com/stream.
21. Woo M., Neider J., Davis T., Shreiner D. OpenGL Programming Guide: The Official Guide to Learning OpenGL, version 1.2 1999, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Boston, MA.
22. Liu W., Schmidt B., Voss G., Müller-Wittig W. High Performance Computing-HiPC 2007: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2007, Vol. 4873:185-196. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. S. Aluru, M. Parashar, R. Badrinath, V.K. Prasanna (Eds.).
23. Stone J.E., Phillips J.C., Freddolino P.L., Hardy D.J., Trabuco L.G., Schulten K. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28:2618-2640.
24. Phillips J.C., Stone J.E., Schulten K. Adapting a message-driven parallel application to gpu-accelerated clusters, In SC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE conference on Super computing, 1-9 2008, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
25. van Meel J.A., Arnold A., Frenkel D., Portegies Zwart S.F., Belleman R.G. Harvesting graphics power for MD simulations. Mol. Simulat. 2008, 34:259-266.
26. Rapaport D.C. Enhanced molecular dynamics performance with a programmable graphics processor, arXiv Physics 2009, arXiv:0911.5631v1.
27. Anderson J.A., Lorenz C.D., Travesset A. General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:5342-5359.
28. Davis J., Ozsoy A., Patel S., Taufer M. Towards Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Graphics Processors 2009, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
29. Harvey M.J., Giupponi G., De Fabritiis G. ACEMD: Accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5:1632-1639.
30. Friedrichs M.S., Eastman P., Vaidyanathan V., Houston M., Le Grand S., Beberg A.L., Ensign D.L., Bruns C.M., Pande V.S. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30:864-872.
31. Case D.A., Darden T.A., Cheatham T.E., Simmerling C.L., Wang J., Duke R.E., Luo R., Crowley M., Walker R.C., Williamson M.J., Zhang W., Merz K.M., Wang B., Hayik S., Roitberg A., Seabra G., Kolossváry I., Wong K.F., Paesani F., Vanicek J., Wu X., Brozell S.R., Steinbrecher T., Gohlke H., Yang L., Tan C., Mongan J., Hornak V., Cui G., Mathews D.H., Seetin M.G., Sagui C., Babin V., Kollman P.A. Amber 11, Technical report 2010, University of California, San Francisco.
32. Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. Particle mesh ewald: An Nlog(N) method for ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98:10089-10092.
33. Essmann U., Perera L., Berkowitz M.L., Darden T., Lee H., Pedersen L.G. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103:8577-8593.
34. Harvey M.J., De Fabritiis G. An implementation of the smooth particle mesh Ewald method on GPU hardware. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5:2371-2377.
35. Eastman P., Pande V.S. Efficient nonbonded interactions for molecular dynamics on a graphics processing unit. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31:1268-1272.
36. Brooks B.R., Bruccoleri R.E., Olafson B.D., States D.J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4:187-217.
37. Wu Y., Tepper H.L., Voth G.A. Flexible simple point-charge water model with improved liquid-state properties. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124:24503.
38. Grand S.L, Goetz A.W., Xu D., Poole D., Walker R.C. Accelerating of amber generalized born calculations using nvidia graphics processing units 2010, (in preparation).
39. Grand S.L, Goetz A.W., Xu D., Poole D., Walker R.C. Achieving high performance in amber PME simulations using graphics processing units without compromising accuracy 2010, (in preparation).
40. Phillips J.C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., Chipot C., Skeel R.D., Kale L., Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26:1781-1802.
41. Ensign D.L., Pande V.S. The Fip35 WW domain folds with structural and mechanistic heterogeneity in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:L53-5.
42. Voelz V.A., Bowman G.R., Beauchamp K., Pande V.S. Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:1526-1528.
43. Shirts M., Pande V.S. Computing: Screen savers of the world unite!. Science 2000, 290:1903-1904.
44. NVIDIA Corporation Next generation CUDA compute architecture: Fermi, 2009.