Recurrent stroke after cervical artery dissection

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 81, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 869-873

  Weimar, Christian ^a   Kraywinkel, Klaus ^b   Hagemeister, Christoph ^c   Haaß, Anton ^d   Katsarava, Zaza ^a   Brunner, Freimuth ^e   Haverkamp, Christian ^f   Schmid, Elisabeth ^g   Diener, Hans Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b ROBERT KOCH INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^c EVANGELISCHES KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e KLINIKUM BREMEN MITTE   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^g Bürgerhospital Stuttgart ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTERY DISSECTION; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; CERVICAL ARTERY DISSECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; STROKE; SURVIVAL; VERTEBRAL ARTERY; CEREBRAL ARTERY DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; GERMANY; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; ANTICOAGULANTS; CEREBRAL ARTERIAL DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLATELET AGGREGATION INHIBITORS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; SURVIVAL;

EID: 77955763983     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: 1468330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192153     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Leys D, Bandu L, Henon H, et al. Clinical outcome in 287 consecutive young adults (15 to 45 years) with ischemic stroke. Neurology 2002;59:26-33. (Pubitemid 34742790)
2. Nedeltchev K, der Maur TA, Georgiadis D, et al. Ischaemic stroke in young adults: Predictors of outcome and recurrence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2005;76:191-5.
3. Bogousslavsky J, Pierre P. Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin 1992;10:113-24.
4. Arauz A, Hoyos L, Espinoza C, et al. Dissection of cervical arteries: Long-term follow-up study of 130 consecutive cases. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:150-4. (Pubitemid 44114457)
5. Chan MT, Nadareishvili ZG, Norris JW. Diagnostic strategies in young patients with ischemic stroke in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 2000;27:120-4.
6. Putaala J, Metso AJ, Metso TM, et al. Analysis of 1008 consecutive patients aged 15 to 49 with first-ever ischemic stroke: The Helsinki young stroke registry. Stroke 2009;40:1195-203.
7. Lee VH, Brown RD Jr., Mandrekar JN, et al. Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: a population-based study. Neurology 2006;67:1809-12.
8. Bassetti C, Carruzzo A, Sturzenegger M, et al. Recurrence of cervical artery dissection. A prospective study of 81 patients. Stroke 1996;27:1804-7.
9. Schievink WI, Mokri B, O'Fallon WM. Recurrent spontaneous cervical-artery dissection. N Engl J Med 1994;330:393-7.
10. Beletsky V, Nadareishvili Z, Lynch J, et al. Cervical arterial dissection: Time for a therapeutic trial? Stroke 2003;34:2856-60.
11. Touze E, Gauvrit JY, Moulin T, et al. Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection: a multicenter study. Neurology 2003;61:1347-51. (Pubitemid 37463368)
12. Leys D, Moulin T, Stojkovic T, et al. Follow-up of patients with history of cervical artery dissection. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995;5:43-9.
13. Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S, et al. Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2007;38:2605-11.
14. Kittner SJ, Stern BJ, Wozniak M, et al. Cerebral infarction in young adults: the Baltimore - Washington cooperative young stroke study. Neurology 1998;50:890-4. (Pubitemid 28212811)
15. Bonati LH, Wetzel SG, Gandjour J, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke attributable to internal carotid artery dissection: the significance of vessel patency. Stroke 2008;39:483-5. (Pubitemid 351619477)
16. Kremer C, Mosso M, Georgiadis D, et al. Carotid dissection with permanent and transient occlusion or severe stenosis: long-term outcome. Neurology 2003;60:271-5.
17. Menon R, Kerry S, Norris JW, et al. Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2008;79:1122-7.
18. Georgiadis D, Arnold M, von Buedingen HC, et al. Aspirin vs anticoagulation in carotid artery dissection: a study of 298 patients. Neurology 2009;72:1810-15.
19. Lyrer P, Engelter S. Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration, ed. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software © Cochrane Library, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003.
20. Georgiadis D, Arnold M, von Buedingen HC, et al. Aspirin vs anticoagulation in carotid artery dissection: a study of 298 patients. Neurology 2009;72:1810-15.
21. Lyrer P, Engelter S. Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration, ed. The Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software © Cochrane Library, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003.