The effect of challenge and threat appraisals under evaluative presence

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2071-2104

  Feinberg, Joshua M ^a   Aiello, John R ^b  

^a Saint Peter's College   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955757178     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aiello J R, Douthitt E A. Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2001, 5(3):163-180.
2. Aiello J R, Kolb K J. Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:339-353.
3. Baron R S, Moore D, Sanders G S. Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36:816-824.
4. Blascovich J, Mendes W B, Hunter S B, Salomon K. Social " facilitation" as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:68-77.
5. Blascovich J, Tomaka J. The biopsychsocial model of arousal regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1996, 28:1-51.
6. Bond C F, Titus L J. Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 94:265-292.
7. Cottrell N B. Social facilitation. Experimental social psychology 1972, 185-236. McClintock C G. Ed., New York, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston
8. Davidson R, Henderson R. Electronic performance monitoring: A laboratory investigation of the influence of monitoring and difficulty on task performance, mood state, and self-reported stress levels. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2000, 30:906-920.
9. Drach-Zahavy A, Erez M. Challenge versus threat effects on the goal-performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 88:667-682.
10. Dweck C, Leggett E. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 1988, 95:256-273.
11. Elliot A J, Church M A. A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72:218-232.
12. Feinberg J M. The achievement goal model of social facilitation. Dissertation Abstracts International 2003, 64:2982.
13. Feinberg J M, Aiello J R. Social facilitation: A test of competing theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36:1-23.
14. Ferguson E, Matthews G, Cox T. The Appraisal of Life Events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity. British Psychological Society 1999, 4:97-116.
15. Gribben J A. Solution-word letter sequences in anagram solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 85:192-197.
16. Guerin B. Social facilitation 1993, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
17. Hartley T R, Ginsburg G P, Heffner K. Self-presentation and cardiovascular reactivity. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1999, 32:75-88.
18. Larson J R, Callahan C. Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:530-538.
19. Lazarus R S, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping 1984, New York, Springer
20. Lazarus R S, Opton E M, Nomikos M S, Rankin N O. The principle of short-circuiting of threat: Further evidence. Journal of Personality 1965, 33:622-635.
21. LePine J A, LePine M A, Jackson C L. Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89:883-891.
22. Maier K J, Waldstein S R, Synowski B A. Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2003, 26:32-41.
23. Mikolajczak M, Luminet O. Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 44:1445-1453.
24. Sanders G S. Driven by distraction: An integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981, 17:227-251.
25. Sanna L J. Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:774-786.
26. Sanna L J, Mark M M. Self-handicapping, expected evaluation, and performance: Accentuating the positive and attenuating the negative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 64:84-102.
27. Sanna L J, Pusecker P A. Self-efficacy, valence of self-evaluation, and performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1994, 20:82-92.
28. Sanna L J, Shotland R L. Valence of anticipated evaluation and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1990, 26:82-92.
29. Spence K W. Behavior theory and conditioning 1956, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press
30. Tomaka J, Blascovich J. Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:732-740.
31. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey R M, Leitten C L. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65:248-260.
32. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst J M. Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat of challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:63-72.
33. Triplett N. The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking competition. American Journal of Psychology 1898, 9:507-533.
34. Wright R A, Kirby L D. Cardiovascular correlates of challenge and threat appraisals: A critical examination of the biopsychosocial analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003, 7:216-233.
35. Wright R A, Tunstall A M, Williams B J, Goodwin J S, Harmon-Jones E. Social evaluation and cardiovascular response: An active coping approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 69:530-543.
36. Zajonc R B. Social facilitation. Science 1965, 149:269-274.
37. Zajonc R B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 1980, 35:151-175.