Exploring the deterioration factors of RC bridge decks: A rough set approach

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 517-529

  Huang, Rong Yau ^a   Mao, I Shiang ^a   Lee, Hao Kang ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE MAINTENANCE; BRIDGE MANAGEMENT; BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; DETERIORATION FACTOR; MANN-WHITNEY; ROUGH SET; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS;

BRIDGE DECKS; DATA MINING; DETERIORATION;

ROUGH SET THEORY;

BRIDGE; DATA MINING; MAINTENANCE;

TAIWAN;

EID: 77955735340     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00665.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adeli H, Hung S L. A concurrent adaptive conjugate gradient learning algorithm on MIMD machines. Journal of Supercomputer Applications 1993, 7(2):155-66.
2. Adeli H, Hung S L. An adaptive conjugate gradient learning algorithm for effective training of multilayer neural networks. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1994, 62(1):81-102.
3. Causes, Evaluation and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures 2007, American Concrete Institute, ACI Committee Reports, 224.1R-07
4. Attoh-Okine N O. Rough set application to data mining principles in pavement management database. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 1997, 11(4):231-37.
5. Banerjee S, Shinozuka M. Nonlinear static procedure for seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2007, 22(4):293-305.
6. Belli K, Wadia-Fascetti S, Rappaport C. Model based evaluation of bridge decks using ground penetrating radar. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2008, 23(1):3-16.
7. Caracoglia L, Noè S, Sepe V. Nonlinear computer model for the simulation of lock-in vibration on long-span bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2009, 24(2):130-44.
8. Chang J R, Hung C T, Tzeng G H, Kang S C. Using rough set theory to induce pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategy. Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology 2007, 542-49. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, /Heidelberg
9. Chen T Y. A study on the prediction of degradation of the freeway bridges by using neural networks 2005, Master thesis, N, ational Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
10. Cruz P J S, Salgado R. Performance of vibration-based damage detection methods in bridges. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2009, 24(1):62-79.
11. Czerniak J, Zarzycki H. Application of rough sets in the presumptive diagnosis of urinary system diseases. Artificial Intelligence and Security in Computing Systems 2003, 41-51. Kluwer Academic Publishers
12. Dubois D, Prade H. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets*. International Journal of General Systems 1990, 17(2):191-209.
13. Furuta H, Hirokane M. Rough-set-based knowledge acquisition from cases for integrity assessment of bridge structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 1998, 13(4):265-73.
14. Geng R, Xu W, Dong X. Efficient mining of interesting weighted patterns from directed graph traversals. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 2009, 16(1):21-49.
15. Geng Z, Zhu Q. Rough set-based fuzzy rule acquisition and its application for fault diagnosis in petrochemical process. Industrial Engineering of Chemical Research 2009, 48(2):827-36.
16. Gindy M, Vaccaro R, Nassif H, Velde J. A state-space approach for deriving bridge displacement from acceleration. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2008, 23(4):281-90.
17. Gonzalez J A, Algaba S, Andrade C. Corrosion of reinforcing bars in carbonated concrete. British Corrosion Journal 1982, 15(3):135-39.
18. Grzymala-Busse D M, Grzymala-Busse J W. The usefulness of a machine learning approach to knowledge acquisition. Computational Intelligence 1995, 11(2):268-79.
19. Hall M A. Correlation based feature selection for machine learning 1999, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
20. He X, Moaveni B, Conte J P, Elgamal A, Masri S F. Modal identification study of Vincent Thomas Bridge using simulated wind-induced ambient vibration data. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2008, 23(5):373-88.
21. Huang R Y, Hsu W Z. Reliability-based component deterioration model for bridge life-cycle cost analysis. Journal of Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering 2005, 17(4):679-91.
22. Huang Y H. Modelling deterioration of concrete bridge decks using neural networks 2003, Ph.D. thesis, U, niversity of Wisconsin at Madison, WI
23. Hung S L, Adeli H. Parallel backpropagation learning algorithms on Cray Y-MP8/864 Supercomputer. Neurocomputing 1993, 5(6):287-302.
24. Hung S L, Adeli H. A parallel genetic/neural network learning algorithm for MIMD shared memory machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 1994, 5(6):900-9.
25. Jensen R, Shen Q. Fuzzy-rough sets assisted attribute selection. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2007, 15(1):73-89.
26. Jiang Y. The development of performance prediction and optimization models for bridge management systems 1990, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
27. John G H, Kohavi R, Pfleger K. Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. 1994, 121-29. New Brunswick, NJ
28. Kim Y M, Kim C K, Lee J C. Rough set algorithm for crack category determination of reinforced concrete structures. Advances in Engineering Software 2009, 40(3):202-11.
29. Kohavi R. Wrappers for performance enhancement and oblivious decision graphs 1995, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
30. Koller D, Sahami M. Toward optimal feature selection. 1996, 284-92. Bari, Italy
31. MacQueen J B. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. 1967, 281-97. Berkeley, University of California Press
32. Mak B, Munakata T. Rule extraction from expert heuristics: a comparative study of rough sets with neural networks and ID3. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 136:212-29.
33. Mondal P, DeWolf J T. Development of computer-based system for the temperature monitoring of a post-tensioned segmental concrete box-girder bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2007, 22(1):65-77.
34. Morcous G, Rivard H, Hanna A M. Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2002, 8(3):86-95.
35. Ng P L, Kwan A K H. Effects of traffic vibration on curing concrete stitch: Part II-cracking, debonding and strength reduction. Engineering Structures 2007, 29:2881-92.
36. Ni Y Q, Zhou H F, Chan K C, Ko J M. Modal flexibility analysis of cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge for damage identification. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2008, 23(3):223-36.
37. Pasek Z. Exploration of rough sets theory use for manufacturing process monitoring. Proceedings of the IMechE Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 2006, 220(3):365-74.
38. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science 1982, 11(5):341-56.
39. Radzikowska A M, Kerre E K. A comparative study of fuzzy rough sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2002, 126(2):137-55.
40. Raina V K. Concrete Bridges: Inspection, Repair, Strengthening, Testing and Load Capacity Evaluation 1994, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New York
41. Sarkar M. Fuzzy-rough nearest neighbor algorithms in classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2007, 158(19):2134-52.
42. Scherer W T, Glagola D M. Markovian models for bridge maintenance management. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1994, 120(1):37-51.
43. Soyoz S, Feng M Q. Long-term monitoring and identification of bridge structural parameters. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2009, 24(2):82-92.
44. Stefanowski R. Rough sets theory and discriminant methods as tools for analysis of information systems, a comparative study. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 1992, 17(2):81-98.
45. Su H J. A: correlation study of the existing bridges for failure analysis-case study of Taichung County 2003, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan
46. Tao X, Li Y, Nayak R. Knowledge retrieval model using ontology mining and user profiling. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 2008, 15(4):313-29.
47. Fatigue Design of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints 1997, Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report 402, National Research Council, Washington, DC
48. Performance Testing for Modular Bridge Joint Systems 2002, Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report 467, National Research Council, Washington, DC
49. Concrete Bridge Deck Performance: A Synthesis of Highway Practice 2004, Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Synthesis 333, The National Academies, Washington, DC
50. Zhao Z, Chen C. A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis. Computer and Structures 2002, 80(7):629-41.
51. Zhong N, Dong J, Ohsuga S. Using rough set with heuristics for feature selection. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 2001, 16:199-214.
52. Zhu Z, Gu M, Chen Z Q. Wind tunnel and computational fluid dynamics study of identification of flutter derivatives of a long-span self-anchored suspension bridge. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2007, 22(8):541-54.