Unsupervised pattern recognition in continuous seismic wavefield records using Self-Organizing Maps

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 182, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1619-1630

  Köhler, Andreas ^a   Ohrnberger, Matthias ^b   Scherbaum, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Neural networks, fuzzy logic; Probability distributions; Site effects; Volcano monitoring; Volcano seismology

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE VOLCANOES; CLUSTERING PROCEDURE; DATA-DRIVEN; DECISION PROCESS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EVENT DETECTION; FEATURE GENERATION; FEATURE SELECTION; FEATURE VECTORS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; INDONESIA; LONG-TERM VARIATIONS; LOVE WAVE DISPERSION; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; PARAMETERIZED; PLANAR SURFACE; ROCKFALLS; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ARRAYS; SEISMIC DATAS; SEISMIC RECORDS; SEISMIC SIGNALS; SEISMIC VIBRATIONS; SEISMIC WAVEFIELDS; SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SITE EFFECTS; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; TEMPORAL PATTERN; TIME WINDOWS; VOLCANO MONITORING; VOLCANO SEISMOLOGY; WAVE NUMBERS; WAVEFIELDS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DATA STRUCTURES; DATA VISUALIZATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; ROCK BURSTS; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SURFACE WAVES; VISUALIZATION; VOLCANOES;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; IMAGING METHOD; LOVE WAVE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC WAVE; SEISMOGRAM; SEISMOLOGY; SITE EFFECT; VISUALIZATION; WAVE DISPERSION; WAVE FIELD;

EAST JAVA; GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; INDONESIA; JAVA; MERAPI; SUNDA ISLES;

EID: 77955732771     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04709.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aki K. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo 1957, 35:415-456.
2. Asten M. On bias and noise in passive seismic data from finite circular array data processed using SPAC methods. Geophysics 2006, 71(6):153-162.
3. Bai C, Kennett B. Automatic phase-detection and identification by full use of a single three-component broadband seismogram. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2000, 90(1):187-198.
4. Bard P. Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion 1998, 3:1251-1279. Irikura KKudo KOkada HSasatani T. Vol., eds, Balkema, Rotterdam
5. Bardainne T, Gaillot P, Dubos-Sallée N, Blanco J, Sén échal G. Characterization of seismic waveforms and classification of seismic events using chirplet atomic decomposition. Example from the Lacq gas field (Western Pyrenees, France). Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 166(47):699-718.
6. Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cotton F, Bard P. The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies A literature review. Earth Sci. Rev. 2006, (3-4):205-227.
7. Christoffersson A, Husebye E, Ingate S. Wavefield decomposition using ML-probabilities in modelling single-site 3-component records. Geophys. J. Int. 1988, 93(2):197-213.
8. Dai H, MacBeth C. Automatic picking of seismic arrivals in local earthquake data using an artificial neural network. Geophys. J. Int. 1995, 120(3):758-774.
9. Davies D, Bouldin D. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 1979, 1(2):224-227.
10. De Matos M, Osorio P, Johann P. Unsupervised seismic facies analysis using wavelet transform and self-organizing maps. Geophysics 2007, 72:9-21.
11. Dowla F, Taylor S, Anderson R. Seismic discrimination with artificial neural networks: preliminary results with regional spectral data. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1990, 80(5):1346-1373.
12. Esposito A, Giudicepietro F, D'Auria L, Scarpetta S, Martini M, Col telli M, Marinaro M. Unsupervised neural analysis of very-long-period events at Stromboli volcano using the self-organizing maps. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008, 98(5):2449-2459.
13. Essenreiter R, Karrenbach M, Treitel S. Identification and classification of multiple reflections with self-organizing maps. Geophys. Prospect. 2001, 49(3):341-352.
14. Hearn S, Hendrick N. A review of single-station time-domain polarisation analysis techniques. J. Seismic Explor. 1999, 8:181-202.
15. Herrmann R. Computer Programs in Seismology: An Overview of Synthetic Seismogram Computation, Version 3.20 2002, 183. pp., Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis University
16. Jepsen D, Kennett B. Three-component analysis of regional seismograms. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1990, 80(6 B):2032-2052.
17. Joswig M. Pattern recognition for earthquake detection. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1990, 80(1):170-186.
18. Jurkevics A. Polarization analysis of three-component array data. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1988, 78(5):1725-1743.
19. Klose C. Self-organizing maps for geoscientific data analysis: geological interpretation of multidimensional geophysical data. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 10(3):265-277.
20. Köhler A, Ohrnberger M, Scherbaum F, Wathelet M, Cornou C. Assessing the reliability of the modified three-component spatial autocorrelation technique. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168(2):779-796.
21. Köhler A, Ohrnberger M, Riggelsen C, Scherbaum F. Unsupervised feature selection for pattern search in seismic time series. J. Mach. Learn. Res., Workshop and Conference Proceedings: New challenges for feature selection in data mining and knowledge discovery 2008, 4:106-121.
22. Köhler A, Ohrnberger M, Scherbaum F. Unsupervised feature selection and general pattern discovery using Self-Organizing Maps for gaining insights into the nature of seismic wavefields. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35(9):1757-1767.
23. Kohonen T. Self-Organizing Maps 2001, 501. Springer Series in Information Sciences, Vol. 30, Third Extended Edition, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1995, 1997, 2001
24. Kvaerna T, Ringdahl F. Stability of various fk estimation techniques. 1986, 20. Kjeller, Norway, pp.
25. Maurer W, Dowla F, Jarpe S. Seismic event interpretation using self-organizing neural networks. 1992, 950-958. 10.1117/12.139971, Vol., 1709, pp., doi
26. McNutt S. Seismic monitoring and eruption forecasting of volcanoes: a review of the state-of-the-art and case histories. Monitoring and Mitigation of Volcano Hazards 1996, 99-146. pp
27. Milana G, Barba S, Del Pezzo E, Zambonelli E. Site response from ambient noise measurements: new perspectives from an array study in Central Italy. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1996, 86(2):320-328.
28. Minakami T. Fundamental research for predicting volcanic eruptions (Part 1). Earthquakes and crustal deformations originating from volcanic activities. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 1960, 38:497-544.
29. Morozov I, Smithson S. Instantaneous polarization attributes and directional filtering. Geophysics 1996, 61:872-881.
30. Musil M, Plešinger A. Discrimination between local microearthquakes and quarry blasts by multi-layer perceptrons and Kohonen maps. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1996, 86(4):1077-1090.
31. Ohmachi T, Umezono T. Rate of Rayleigh waves in microtremors. Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion 1998, 587-592. Irikura K, Kudo KOkada HSasatani T. eds, Balkana, Rotterdam
32. Ohrnberger M. Continuous automatic classification of seismic signals of volcanic origin at Mt. Merapi, Java, Indonesia. 2001, 158. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2005/31/pdf/ohrnberg.pdf, PhD thesis, University of Potsdam, (accessed on 31 March 2009)
33. Parolai S, Picozzi M, Richwalski S, Milkereit C. Joint inversion of phase velocity dispersion and H/V ratio curves from seismic noise recordings using a genetic algorithm, considering higher modes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L01303. 10.1029/2004GL021115, doi
34. Pedersen H, Krüger F. Influence of the seismic noise characteristics on noise correlations in the Baltic shield. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168(1):197-210.
35. Pinnegar C. Polarization analysis and polarization filtering of three-component signals with the time-frequency S transform. Geophys. J. Int. 2006, 165(2):596-606.
36. Plešinger A, Ržek B, Boušková A. Statistical interpretation of WEBNET seismograms by artificial neural nets. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 2000, 44(2):251-271.
37. Reading A, Mao W, Gubbins D. Polarization filtering for automatic picking of seismic data and improved converted phase detection. Geophys. J. Int. 2001, 147(1):227-234.
38. René R, Fitter J, Forsyth P, Kim K, Murray D, Walters J, Westerman J. Multicomponent seismic studies using complex trace analysis. Geophysics 1986, 51:1235-1251.
39. Riggelsen C, Ohrnberger M, Scherbaum F. Dynamic bayesian networks for real-time classification of seismic signals. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. 2007, 4702:565-572.
40. Sabra K, Gerstoft P, Roux P, Kuperman W, Fehler M. Extracting time-domain Green(tm)s function estimates from ambient seismic noise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L03310. 10.1029/2004GL021862, doi
41. Samson J, Olson J. Data-adaptive polarization filters for multichannel geophysical data. Geophysics 1981, 46:1423-1431.
42. Scherbaum F, Hinzen K, Ohrnberger M. Determination of shallow shear wave velocity profiles in the Cologne, Germany area using ambient vibrations. Geophys. J. Int. 2003, 152(3):597-612.
43. Schimmel M, Gallart J. Degree of polarization filter for frequency-dependent signal enhancement through noise suppression. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94(3):1016-1035.
44. Shapiro N, Campillo M, Stehly L, Ritzwoller M. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science 2005, 307(5715):1615-1618.
45. Stehly L, Campillo M, Shapiro N. A study of the seismic noise from its long-range correlation properties. J. geophys. Res 2006, 111:1-12.
46. Taner M, Koehler F, Sheriff R. Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics 1979, 44:1041-1063.
47. Tarvainen M. Recognizing explosion sites with a self-organizing network for unsupervised learning. Phys. Earth planet. Int. 1999, 113(1-4):143-154.
48. Vesanto J, Ahola J. Hunting for correlations in data using the self-organizing map. Proceedings of the International Congress on Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications (CIMA 99), International Computing Sciences Conferences (ICSC) 1999, 279-285. Academic Press, pp.
49. Vesanto J, Alhoniemi E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Network 2000, 11(3):586-600.
50. Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parhankangas J, Team S, Oy L. Som toolbox for matlab. Techn. Ber., Helsinki University of Technology 2000
51. Vidale J. Complex polarization analysis of particle motion. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1986, 76(5):1393-1405.
52. Wald A, Wolfowitz J. On a test whether two samples are from the same population. Ann. Math. Stat. 1940, 11(2):147-162.
53. Wang J, Teng T. Identification and picking of S phase using an artificial neural network. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1997, 87(5):1140-1149.
54. Wathelet M, Jongmans D, Ohrnberger M. Surface wave inversion using a direct search algorithm and its application to ambient vibration measurements. Near Surface Geophysics 2004, 2:211-221.
55. Withers M, Aster R, Young C, Beiriger J, Harris M, Moore S, Trujillo J. A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1998, 88(1):95-106.