Quantum chemistry on graphics processing units

Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 6, Issue C, 2010, Pages 21-35

  Götz, Andreas W ^a   Wölfle, Thorsten ^a,b   Walker, Ross C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accelerator; ATI; CUDA; Density functional theory; Graphics processing units; Hartree Fock theory; M ller Plesset perturbation theory; NVIDIA; Quantum chemistry; Quantum Monte Carlo

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955732124     PISSN: 15741400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1574-1400(10)06002-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Clary D.C. Quantum chemistry of complex systems. Science 2006, 314(5797):265-266.
2. Carter E.A. Challenges in modeling materials properties without experimental input. Science 2008, 321(5890):800-803.
3. Atomistic Approaches in Modern Biology, Topics in Current Chemistry 2007, Springer, Heidelberg. M. Reiher (Ed.).
4. Helgaker T., Jørgensen P., Olsen J. Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory 2000, Wiley, West Sussex, England.
5. Kirk D.B., Hwu W.W. Programming Massively Parallel Processors 2010, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington, MA.
6. Frigo M., Johnson S.G. The design and implementation of FFTW3. Proc. IEEE 2005, 93(2):216-231.
7. NVIDIA Santa Clara, CA, CUDA Programming Guide (Accessed March 6, 2010). http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/3_0/toolkit/docs/NVIDIA_CUDA_ProgrammingGuide_3.0.pdf.
8. AMD Sunnyvale, CA, ATI(Accessed March 14, 2010). http://www.amd.com/stream.
9. NVIDIA Santa Clara, CA, CUDA(Accessed March 6, 2010). http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home.html.
10. NVIDIA Santa Clara, CA, CUFFT Library(Accessed March 6, 2010). http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/2_3/toolkit/docs/CUFFT_Library_2.3.pdf.
11. NVIDIA Santa Clara, CA, CUBLAS Library 2.0(Accessed March 6, 2010). http://developer.download.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/2_0/docs/CUBLAS_Library_2.0.pdf.
12. Innovative Computing Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Matrix Algebra on GPU and Multicore Architectures(Accessed March 6, 2010). http://icl.cs.utk.edu/magma.
13. Kohn W., Sham L. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140:A1133-8.
14. Parr R.G., Yang W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules 1989, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Jensen F. Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry 2005, Vol. 1:3-17. Elsevier, Amsterdam. D.C. Spellmeyer (Ed.).
16. Fiolhais C., Nogueira F., Marques M.A.L. A Primer in Density Functional Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics 2003, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
17. Salek P., Høs S., Thøgersen L., Jørgensen P., Manninen P., Olsen J., Jansík B. Linear-scaling implementation of molecular electronic self-consistent field theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:114110.
18. Yasuda K. Two-electron integral evaluation on the graphics processor unit. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 29(3):334-342.
19. Dupuis M., Rys J., King H.F. Evaluation of molecular integrals over Gaussian basis functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 65:111-116.
20. Ufimtsev I.S., Martínez T.J. Graphical processing units for quantum chemistry. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2008, 10(6):26-34.
21. Ufimtsev I.S., Martínez T.J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 1. Strategies for two-electron integral evaluation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4(2):222-231.
22. McMurchie L.E., Davidson E.R. One- and two-electron integrals over Cartesian Gaussian functions. J. Comput. Phys. 1978, 26:218-231.
23. Ufimtsev I.S., Martinez T.J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 2. Direct self-consistent-field implementation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5(4):1004-1015.
24. Schmidt M.W., Baldridge K.K., Boatz J.A., Elbert S.T., Gordon M.S., Jensen J.H., Koseki S., Matsunaga N., Nguyen K.A., Su S., Windus T.L., Dupuis M., Montgomery J.A. General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14(11):1347-1363.
25. Ufimtsev I.S., Martinez T.J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 3. Analytical energy gradients, geometry optimization, and first principles molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5(10):2619-2628.
26. Asadchev A., Allada V., Felder J., Bode B.M., Gordon M.S., Windus T.L. Uncontracted Rys quadrature implementation of up to g functions on graphical processing units. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2010, 6(3):696-704.
27. Yasuda K. Accelerating density functional calculations with graphics processing unit. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4(8):1230-1236.
28. Perdew J.P., Chevary J., Vosko S., Jackson K.A., Pederson M.R., Singh D., Fiolhais C. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46:6671-6687.
29. ClearSpeed Bristol, UK (Accessed March 14, 2010). http://www.clearspeed.com.
30. Brown P., Woods C., McIntosh-Smith S., Manby F.R. Massively multicore parallelization of Kohn-Sham theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4(10):1620-1626.
31. Brown P., Woods C.J., McIntosh-Smith S., Manby F.R. Massively multicore parallelization of Kohn-Sham theory. J. Comput. Chem 2010, 31(10):2008-2013.
32. Baerends E.J., Ellis D., Roos P. Self-consistent molecular Hartree-Fock-Slater calculations. I. The computational procedure. Chem. Phys. 1973, 2:41-51.
33. Dunlap B.I., Connoly J.W.D., Sabin J.R. On some approximations in applications of Xα theory. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71:3396-3402.
34. Eichkorn K., Treutler O., Öhm H., Häser M., Ahlrichs R. Auxiliary basis sets to approximate Coulomb potentials (Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 283). Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 242:652-660.
35. Genovese L., Ospici M., Deutsch T., Méhaut J.-F., Neelov A., Goedecker S. Density functional theory calculation on many-cores hybrid CPU-GPU architectures. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131:34103.
36. Feyereisen M.W., Fitzgerald G., Komornicki A. Use of approximate integrals in ab initio theory. An application in MP2 energy calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 208:359-363.
37. Weigend F., Häser M., Patzelt H., Ahlrichs R. RI-MP2: Optimized auxiliary basis sets and demonstration of efficiency. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 294:143-152.
38. Vogt L., Olivares-Amaya R., Kermes S., Shao Y., Amador-Bedolla C., Aspuru-Guzik A. Accelerating resolution-of-the-identity second-order Møller-Plesset quantum chemistry calculations with graphical processing units. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112(10):2049-2057.
39. Olivares-Amaya R., Watson M.A., Edgar R.G., Vogt L., Shao Y., Aspuru-Guzik A. Accelerating correlated quantum chemistry calculations using graphical processing units and a mixed precision matrix multiplication library. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6(1):135-144.
40. SciGPU-GEMM v0.8 cessed March 6, 2010). http://www.chem-quantum.info/scigpu/?p=61.
41. Ceperley D., Alder B. Quantum Monte Carlo. Science 1986, 231(4738):555-560.
42. Anderson A.G., Goddard W.A., Schröder P. Quantum Monte Carlo on graphical processing units. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2007, 177(3):298-306.
43. Meredith J.S., Alvarez G., Maier T.A., Schulthess T.C., Vette J.S. Accuracy and performance of graphics processors: A quantum Monte Carlo application case study. Parallel Comput. 2009, 35(3):151-163.