The role of temporal aspects for quality assessment

2010 2nd International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEX 2010 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 94-99

  Mantel, Claire ^a,b   Kunlin, Thomas ^a   Ladret, Patricia ^b  

^a STMICROELECTRONICS   (France)

^b GIPSA LAB   (France)

Author keywords

Quality assessment; Subjective experiment; Temporal filtering; Video quality

Indexed keywords

MOTION COMPONENTS; NOISE CORRECTION; PERCEIVED QUALITY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; SPATIO-TEMPORAL; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIMENTS; TEMPORAL ASPECTS; TEMPORAL FILTERING; VIDEO QUALITY;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 77955731862     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5517868     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. R. Hamberg and H. de Ridder, "Continuous assessment of perceptual image quality," Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 12, pp. 2573-2577, 1995.
2. Q. Li and Z.Wang, "Video quality assessment by incorporating a motion perception model," in International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP, 2007, pp. 173-176.
3. M. H. Pinson and S.Wolf, "A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality," IEEE Transactions on broadcasting, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 312-322, 2004.
4. R.P. Aldridge, D.S. Hands, D.E. Pearson, and N.K. Lodge, "Continuous quality assessment of digitally-coded television pictures," Vision Image and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings, vol. 145, pp. 116-123, 1998.
5. A. Ninassi, O. Le Meur, P. Le Callet, and D. Barba, "Considering temporal variations of spatial visual distortions in video quality assessment," IEEE Journal Of Selected Topics In Signal Processing : Special Issue On Visual Media Quality Assessment, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 253-265, 2009.
6. ITU-R, Recommandation BT.500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, 2002.
7. C. Lee, H. Choi, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Choe, "Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods," in SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2006, vol. 6059.
8. M. Pinson and S. Wolf, "Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies," SPIE Electronic Imaging, vol. 5150, pp. 8-11, 2003.
9. L. Itti, "Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes," Visual Cognition, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1093-1123, 2005.
10. C. Mantel, P. Ladret, and T. Kunlin, "A temporal mosquito noise corrector," in Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009. International Workshop on, 2009, pp. 244-249.
11. J. M. Wolfe, A. Reinecke, and P. Brawn, "Why don't we see changes? the role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory," Visual Cognition, vol. 14, no. 4-8, pp. 749-780, 2006.
12. M.-C. Larabi, "Comparison of subjective assessment protocols for digital cinema applications," SPIE Electronic Imaging, vol. 7529, pp. pp1-10, 2010.
13. G. Peeters and J. Czapinski, "Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects," European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 33-60, 1990.
14. ITU-T, Recommandation P910. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, 2008.
15. A. Ninassi, O. LeMeur, P. Le Callet, D. Barba, and A. Tirel, "Task impact on the visual attemtion in subjective image quality assessment," European Signal Processing Conference, Eusipco, vol. 5, pp. 802-817, 2006.
16. VQEG, Test Plan for Evaluation of Video Quality Models for Use with High Definition TV Content v3.0, 2009.
17. D. C. Howell, Statistical methods for psychology, 7th Edition, Wadsworth, 2010.