Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 173-187

  Turvey, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955725982     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: 15326969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy (Vol. 3). Boston: D. Reidel.
2. Bunge, M. (1979). Causality and modern science. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1959)
3. Boring, E. G. (1942). Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4. Epstein, W. (1977). Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley.
5. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)
7. Holway, A. H., & Boring, E. G. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 21-37.
8. Kim, N.-G., Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (in press). Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
9. Koffka, H. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
10. Kornhauser, M. (1964). Structural effects of impact. Baltimore: Spartan Books.
11. Kugler, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Lee, D. N. (1980). Visuo-motor coordination in space-time. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 281-295). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
13. Lombardo, T. J. (1987). The reciprocity of perceiver and environment: The evolution of James? J. Gibson's ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Mach, E. (1960). Science of mechanics. Peru, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1893)
15. Mark, L. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325-366.
16. Newton, I. (1729). Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (A. Motte, Trans.). London: Dawson.
17. Reed, E. (1987). Why do things look as they do? The implications of J. J. Gibson's “The ecological approach to visual perception”. In A. Costall & A. Still (Eds), Cognitive psychology in question (pp. 90-114). New York: St. Martin's Press.
18. Reed, E., & Jones, R. (1982). Reasons for realism: Selected essays of? J. J. Gibson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Rosen, R. (1978). Fundamentals of measurement and representation of natural systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
20. Shaw, R. E., & Kinsella-Shaw, J. (1988). Ecological mechanics: A physical geometry for intentional constraints. Human Movement Science, 7, 155-200.
21. Shaw, R. E., Turvey, M. T., & Mace, W. (1982). Ecological psychology: The consequence of a commitment to realism. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 159-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Swenson, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1991). Thermodynamic reasons for perception-action cycles. Ecological Psychology, 3, 317-348.
23. Turvey, M. T. (1986). lntentionality: A problem of multiple reference frames, specificational information, and extraordinary boundary conditions on natural law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 153-155.
24. Turvey, M. T. (1990). The challenge of a physical account of action: A personal view. In H. T. A. Whiting, O. G. Meijer, & P. C. W. van Wieringen (Eds.), The natural-physical approach to movement control (pp. 57-94). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Free University Press.
25. Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1978). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception as a point of departure for understanding memory. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary (pp. 167-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E., & Mace, W. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn? (1981). Cognition, 9, 237-304.
27. Warren, W., Jr. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683-703.
28. Warren, W., Jr., & Shaw, R. E. (1985). Events and encounters as units of analysis for ecological psychology. In W. Warren, Jr. &. R. E. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change (pp. 1-23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Wheeler, J. A. (1962). Geometrodynamics. New York: Academic.
30. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. New York: Macmillan.