Native-exotic species richness relationships across spatial scales and biotic homogenization in wetland plant communities of Illinois, USA

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 737-743

  Chen, Hua ^a   Qian, Hong ^b   Spyreas, Greg ^c   Crossland, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

^b RESEARCH AND COLLECTIONS CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Diversity invasibility hypothesis; Elton's hypothesis; Exotic species richness; Invasion impacts; Taxonomic homogenization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; HOMOGENEITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INVASIBILITY; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PLANT COMMUNITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES RICHNESS; VASCULAR PLANT; WETLAND;

ILLINOIS; UNITED STATES;

TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 77955724266     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00679.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Barrett SCH, Echert CG, Husband BC. Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant populations. Aquatic Botany 1993, 44:105-145.
2. Baselga A. Disentangling distance decay of similarity from richness gradients: response to Soininen et al. 2007. Ecography 2007, 30:838-841.
3. Bowles M, Jones M. Trends of change in composition and structure of Chicago region wetland vegetation. Chicago Wilderness Journal 2006, 4:25-34.
4. Brown RL, Peet RK. Diversity and invasibility of southern Appalachian plant communities. Ecology 2003, 84:32-39.
5. Byers JE, Noonburg EG. Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology 2003, 84:1428-1433.
6. Carroll C, Dassler C, Ellis J, Spyreas G, Taft JB, Robertson K. Plant sampling protocols. Critical trends assessment program monitoring protocols 2002, 11-19. Molano-Flores B, ed. by,Office of the Chief Technical report 2002-2, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, USA
7. Collins AR, Jose S, Daneshgar P, Ramsey CL. Elton's hypothesis revisited: an experimental test using cogongrass. Biological Invasions 2007, 9:433-443.
8. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Heard MS, Edwards GG. Invasion-resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? Ecology Letters 1999, 2:140-148.
9. Cully AC, Cully JF, Hiebert RD. Invasion of exotic plant species in tallgrass prairie fragments. Conservation Biology 2003, 17:990-998.
10. Darwin C. The origin of species 1859, Reprinted by Penguin Books, London
11. Davies KF, Chesson P, Harrison S, Inouye BD, Melbourne BA, Rice KJ. Spatial heterogeneity explains the scale dependence of the native-exotic diversity relationship. Ecology 2005, 86:1602-1610.
12. Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA. Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2003, 12:53-64.
13. Dutilleul P. Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 1993, 49:305-314.
14. Elton CS. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants 1958, Methuen, London, UK
15. Fridley JD, Brown RL, Bruno JF. Null models of exotic invasion and scale-dependent patterns of native and exotic species richness. Ecology 2004, 85:3215-3222.
16. Fridley JD, Stachowicz JJ, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Stohlgren TJ, Tilman D, Von Holle B. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 2007, 88:3-17.
17. Green AJ, Figuerola J, Sánchez MI. Implications of waterbird ecology for the dispersal of aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 2002, 23:177-189.
18. Grey EK. Scale-dependent relationships between native richness, resource stability and exotic cover in dock fouling communities of Washington, USA. Diversity and Distributions 2009, 15:1073-1080.
19. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology 2009, 97:393-403.
20. Herben T, Mandak B, Bimova K, Munzbergova Z. Invasibility and species richness of a community: A neutral model and a survey of published data. Ecology 2004, 85:3223-3233.
21. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS. Effect of invasive plant species on temperate wetland plant diversity. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:1132-1138.
22. Hulme PE. Contrasting alien and native plant species-area relationships: the importance of spatial grain and extent. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2008, 17:641-647.
23. Knops JMH, Tilman D, Haddad NM, Naeem S, Mitchell CE, Haarstad J, Ritchie ME, Howe KM, Reich PB, Siemann E, Groth J. Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecology Letters 1999, 2:286-293.
24. Lambdon PW, Lloret F, Hulme PE. Do non-native species invasions lead to biotic homogenization at small scales? The similarity and functional diversity of habitats compared for alien and native components of Mediterranean floras. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14:774-785.
25. Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical ecology 1998, 2nd edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam
26. Levine JM. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 2000, 288:852-854.
27. Levine JM, D'Antonio CM. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 1999, 87:15-26.
28. Lonsdale WM. Global patterns of plant invasion and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 1999, 80:1522-1536.
29. Lyons KG, Schwartz MW. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function - invasion resistance. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:358-365.
30. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 2000, 10:689-710.
31. Marchetti MP, Light T, Feliciano J, Armstrong T, Hogan Z, Viers J, Moyle PB. Homogenization of California's fish fauna through abiotic change. Biotic homogenization 2001, 259-278. Lockwood JL, McKinney ML, ed. by, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York
32. Marchetti MP, Lockwood JL, Light T. Effects of urbanization on California's fish diversity: differentiation, homogenization and the influence of spatial scale. Biological Conservation 2006, 127:310-318.
33. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1999, 14:450-453.
34. Mohlenbrock RH. Vascular flora of Illinois 2002, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale
35. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ. Invasive species in a changing world 2000, Island Press, Washington, D.C
36. Naeem S, Knops JMH, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 2000, 91:97-108.
37. Olden JD. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 2006, 33:2027-2039.
38. Olden JD, Poff NL. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. American Naturalist 2003, 162:442-460.
39. Planty-Tabacchi AM, Tabacchi E, Naiman RJ, Deferrari C, Decamps H. Invasibility of species rich communities in riparian zones. Conservation Biology 1996, 10:598-607.
40. Qian H, Dolbeare BL. Exotic plants of Illinois. The Living Museum 2008, 70:3-10.
41. Qian H, Guo Q. Linking biotic homogenization to habitat type, invasiveness, and growth form of naturalized alien plants in North America. Diversity and Distributions 2010, 16:119-125.
42. Qian H, Ricklefs RE. The role of exotic species in homogenizing the North American flora. Ecology Letters 2006, 9:1293-1298.
43. Qian H, McKinney ML, Kühn I. Effects of introduced species on floristic similarity: comparing two US states. Basic and Applied Ecology 2008, 9:617-625.
44. Rahel FJ. Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science 2000, 288:854-856.
45. Richardson DM, Pyšek P. Fifty years of invasion ecology - the legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14:161-168.
46. Richardson DM, Rouget M, Ralston SJ, Cowling RM, van Rensburg BJ, Thuiller W. Species richness of alien plants in South Africa: environmental correlates and the relationship with indigenous plant species richness. Ecoscience 2005, 12:391-402.
47. Ricklefs RE, Guo Q, Qian H. Growth form and distribution of introduced plants in their native and non-native ranges in Eastern Asia and North America. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14:381-386.
48. Rooney TP, Wiegmann SM, Rogers DA, Waller DM. Biotic impoverishment and homogenization in unfragmented forest understory communities. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:787-798.
49. Santamaría L. Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologica 2002, 23:137-154.
50. Sculthorpe CD. The biology of aquatic vascular plants 1967, Edward Arnold, London
51. Shea K, Chesson P. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasion. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002, 17:170-176.
52. Simpson GG. Notes on the measurement of faunal resemblance. American Journal of Science 1960, 258-A:300-311.
53. Smith MD, Knapp AK. Exotic plant species in a C4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia 1999, 120:605-612.
54. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry 1981, 2nd edn, W. H. Freeman, New York
55. Spyreas G, Ellis J, Carroll C, Molano-Flores B. Non-native plant commonness and dominance in the forests, wetlands, and grasslands of Illinois, USA. Natural Areas Journal 2004, 24:290-299.
56. Spyreas G, Wilm BW, Plocher AE, Ketzner DM, Matthews JW, Heske EJ, Ellis J. Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Biological Invasions 2010, 12:1253-1267.
57. Stachowicz JJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 1999, 286:1577-1579.
58. Stohlgren TJ, Binkley D, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD, Bull KA, Otsuki Y, Newman G, Bashkin M, Son Y. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 1999, 69:25-46.
59. Stohlgren TJ, Barnet DT, Jarnevich CS, Flather C, Kartesz J. The myth of plant species saturation. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:1-10.
60. Taft JB, Wilhelm GS, Ladd DM, Masters LA. Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois, a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Erigenia 1997, 15:3-95.
61. Taylor EB. An analysis of homogenization and differentiation of Canadian freshwater fish faunas with an emphasis on British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:68-79.
62. Tilman D. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 1997, 78:81-92.
63. Von Holle B. Biotic resistance to invader establishment of a southern Appalachian plant community is determined by environmental conditions. Journal of Ecology 2005, 93:16-26.
64. Winter M, Kühn I, Nentwig W, Klotz S. Spatial aspects of trait homogenization within the German flora. Journal of Biogeography 2008, 35:2289-2297.
65. Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, Arianoutsou M, Basnou C, Delipetrou P, Didziulis V, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Lambdon PW, Pergl J, Pysek P, Roy DB, Kühn I. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2009, 106:21721-21725.