Impact of information about risks and benefits of cancer screening on intended participation

European Journal of Cancer

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2267-2274

  Perneger, Thomas V ^a   Cullati, Stéphane ^a   Schiesari, Laura ^a,b   Charvet Bérard, Agathe ^a,c  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b HOSPITAL SÍRIO LIBANÊS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Consumer health information; Decision making; Early detection of cancer; Random allocation; Risk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER TEST; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SWITZERLAND;

ADULT; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 77955714029     PISSN: 09598049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A.E. Raffle Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect 4 2001 92 98
2. L. Irving, K. McCaffrey, G. Salkeld, and P. Bossuyt Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation BMJ 332 2006 1148 1150
3. B.K. Rimer, P.A. Briss, P.K. Zeller, E.C.Y. Chan, and S.H. Woolf Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 101 Suppl. 2004 1214 1228
4. R.G. Jepson, C.A. Forbes, A.J. Sowden, and R.A. Lewis Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review Health Expect 4 2001 116 130
5. R. Fox Informed choice in screening programmes: Do leaflets help? A critical literature review J Public Health 28 2006 309 317
6. P. Adab, T. Marshall, A. Rouse, B. Randhawa, H. Sangha, and N. Bhangoo Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening J Epidemiol Community Health 57 2003 589 593
7. A.M. Wolf, J.F. Nasser, and J.B. Schorling The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening Arch Intern Med 156 1996 1333 1336
8. M. Gattellari, and J.E. Ward Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomised controlled trial J Med Screen 10 2003 27 39
9. G. Domenighetti, R. Grilli, and J.R. Maggi Does provision of an evidence-based information change public willingness to accept screening tests? Health Expect 3 2000 145 150
10. L.M. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, F.J. Fowler, and H.G. Welch Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States JAMA 291 2004 71 78
11. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, S.M. Rubin, C. Sandrock, and V.L. Ernster Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis JAMA 273 1995 149 154
12. W. Rakowski, C.E. Dube, B.H. Marcus, J.O. Prochaska, W.F. Velicer, and D.B. Abrams Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography Health Psychol 11 1992 111 118
13. E. Chamot, A.I. Charvet, and T.V. Perneger Predicting stages of adoption of mammography screening in a general population Eur J Cancer 37 2001 1869 1877
14. J. Ende, L. Kazis, A. Ash, and M.A. Moskowitz Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients J Gen Intern Med 4 1989 23 30
15. E. Chamot, and T.V. Perneger Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma J Epidemiol Community Health 55 2001 799 803
16. G. Domenighetti, B. D'Avanzo, and M. Egger Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries Int J Epidemiol 32 2003 816 821
17. G. Gigerenzer, J. Mata, and R. Frank Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe J Natl Cancer Inst 101 2009 1216 1220
18. E.K. Slaytor, and J.E. Ward How risks of breast cancer and the benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets BMJ 317 1998 263 264
19. K.J. Jorgensen, and P.C. Gotzsche Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study BMJ 328 2004 148 151
20. R. Hughes Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behavior Sociol Health Illn 20 1998 381 400
21. J.W. Peabody, J. Luck, P. Glassman, T.R. Dresselhaus, and M. Lee Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality JAMA 283 2000 1715 1722
22. R.A. Caplan, K.L. Posner, and F.W. Cheney Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care JAMA 265 1991 1957 1960
23. M. Escher, T.V. Perneger, and J.C. Chevrolet National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care BMJ 329 2004 425
24. Charvet A. Cullati, and T.V. Perneger Cancer screening in a middle-aged population: factors associated with practices and attitudes BMC Public Health 9 2009 118
25. L.J. Trevena, H.M. Davey, A. Barratt, P. Butow, and P. Caldwell A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence J Eval Clin Pract 12 2006 13 23
26. E. Chamot, A.I. Charvet, and T.V. Perneger Variability in women's desire for information about mammography screening: implications for informed consent Eur J Cancer Prev 14 2005 413 418
27. W. Levinson, A. Kao, A. Kuby, and R.A. Thisted Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences J Gen Intern Med 20 2005 531 535
28. C. Woodrow, E. Watson, L. Rozmovits, R. Parker, and J. Austoker Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening Health Expect 11 2008 16 25