Content-partitioned structural similarity index for image quality assessment

Signal Processing: Image Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 517-526

  Li, Chaofeng ^a   Bovik, Alan C ^b  

^a JIANGNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Four component image model; Gradient structural similarity (G SSIM); Image quality assessment; Multi scale structural similarity (MS SSIM); Structural similarity (SSIM)

Indexed keywords

BLURRED AND NOISY IMAGES; HUMAN STUDY; HUMAN VISUAL PERCEPTION; IMAGE MODELS; IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS; IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; LOCAL REGION; MULTISCALES; NEW APPROACHES; QUALITY INDICES; REGION TYPES; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 77955708982     PISSN: 09235965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2010.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A.K. Moorthy, and A.C. Bovik Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 3 2 2009 193 200
2. A.C. Brooks, X.N. Zhao, and T.N. Pappas Structural similarity quality metrics in a coding context: exploring the space of realistic distortions IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17 8 2008 1 12
3. M.C. Damon, and S.H. Hemami VSNR: a wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16 9 2007 2284 2298
4. A. Shnayderman, A. Gusev, and A.M. Eskicioglu An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15 2 2006 422 429
5. H.R. Sheikh, A.C. Bovik, and G.D.E. Veciana An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14 12 2005 2117 2128
6. D.M. Rouse, R. Pepion, S.S. Hemami, and P. Le Callet Image utility assessment and a relationship with image quality assessment SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging 7240 2009 724010 724010-14
7. Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, and E.P. Simoncelli Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13 4 2004 600 612
8. Z. Wang, E.P. Simoncelli, and A.C. Bovik Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers 2003 1398 1402
9. Z. Wang, and A.C. Bovik A universal image quality index IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9 2002 81 84
10. A.M. Eskicioglu, and P.S. Fisher Image quality measures and their performance IEEE Transactions on Communications 43 12 1995 2959 2965
11. S.A. Karunasekera, and N.G. Kingsbury A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4 6 1995 713 724
12. N.B. Mill A visual model weighted cosine transform for image compression and quality assessment IEEE Transactions on Communications 33 6 1985 551 557
13. J.A. Saghri Image quality measure based on a human visual system model Optical Engineering 28 7 1989 813 818
14. A.P. Bradley A wavelet visible difference predictor IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 8 1999 717 730
15. X.B. Gao, T. Wang, and J. Li A Content-based image quality metric Proceedings of LNAI 3642 2005 231 240
16. N. Damera-Venkata, T.D. Kite, W.S. Geisler, B.L. Evans, and A.C. Bovik Image quality assessment based on a degradation model IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9 2000 636 650
17. M.P. Eckert, and A.P. Bradley Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression Signal Processing 70 3 1998 177 200
18. F. Imai, N. Tsumura, and Y. MIYAKE Perceptual color difference metric for complex images based on mahalanobis distance Journal of Electronic Imaging 10 2001 385 393
19. M. Miyahara, K. Kotani, and R. Algazi Objective picture quality scale (PQS) for image coding IEEE Transactions on Communications 46 9 1996 1215 1226
20. A. Toet, and M. Lucassen A new universal colour image fidelity metric Displays 24 2003 197 204
21. Z. Wang, and E. Simoncelli Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2 2005 573 576
22. B. Girod What's wrong with mean-squared error A.B. Watson, Digital Images and Human Vision 1993 MIT Press Cambridge, MA 207 220
23. P.C. Teo, and D.J. Heeger Perceptual image distortion Proceedings of SPIE 2179 1994 127 141
24. M.P. Eckert, and A.P. Bradley Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression Signal Processing 70 1998 177 200
25. Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, and L. Lu Why is image quality assessment so difficult IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 4 2002 3313 3316
26. B.A. Wandell, Foundations of Vision, Sinauer Associates Inc., 1995.
27. Z. Wang, and X. Shang Spatial pooling strategies for perceptual image quality assessment IEEE International Conference on Image Processing Sep. 2006 2945 2948
28. D.V. RAO, and L.P. REDDY Image Quality Assessment Based on Perceptual Structural Similarity LNCS 4815 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg pp. 8794
29. G.H. CHEN, C.L. YANG, and S.L. XIE Gradient-based structural similarity for image quality assessment IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2006 2929 2932
30. H.R. Sheikh, M.F. Sabir, and A.C. Bovik A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15 11 2006 3441 3451
31. X. Ran, and N. Farvardin A perceptually-motivated three-component image modelPart I: description of the model IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4 4 1995 401 415
32. J.L. Li, G. Chen, and Z.R. Chi Image coding quality assessment using fuzzy integrals with a three-component image model IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 12 1 2004 99 106
33. H.R. Sheikh, Z. Wang, L. Cormack, A.C. Bovik, LIVE Image Quality Assessment Database, (online) http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality.
34. Z. Wang, and A.C. Bovik Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 26 1 2009 98 117