Evaluation of relationship between delivery mode and postpartum quality of life

Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 47-53

  Abedian, Zahra ^a   Nikpour, Maryam ^b   Mokhber, Naghme ^a   Ebrahimi, Saeed ^a   Khani, Soghra ^c  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cesarean; Postpartum; Quality of life; Vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCCUPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUERPERIUM; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE OF EDINBURGH POSTPARTUM SCALE; RANK SUM TEST; SOCIAL ASPECT; STUDENT T TEST; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 77955680943     PISSN: 16802993     EISSN: 20082363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Peterson S, Bredow TS. Middle range theories. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p.275.
2. nd ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2003. p.5-7,31,54.
3. st ed. Tehran: Andish rafie; 2005. p.66-77.
4. Tingstrom Pia R, Kamwendo K, bergdahl B. Effect of a problem based learning rehabilitation program on quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovascul Nurs 2005;4(4):324-30.
5. Mental Health Group of WHO. WHOQOL measuring quality of life Abuse [Online]. 2004 [Cited 1 Aug 2005];[1 Screen]. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/substance-abuse/research-tools/en/english-whoqol.pdf
6. Division of Mental health and Prevention of Substance Abuse [Online]. 1997 [Cited 1998];[1 Screen]. Available from: URL: http://www who. Int/en tity/ mental-health/ media/68.pdf.
7. Balducci L, Lyman G, Ershler W, Extermann M. Comprehensive pediatric oncology influence of aging on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis Group; 2003. p.29.
8. Schuiling KD, Likis FE. Women's gynecologic Health. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006. p.71.
9. Pesavento F, Marconcini E, Drago D. Quality of life and depression in normal and in high-risk pregnancy: analysis of a sample of 100 women. Minerva Gynecol 2005;57(4):451-60.
10. Symon A, Mackay A, Ruta D. Postnatal quality of life: a pilot study using the Mother-Generated Index. J Adv Nurs 2003;42(1):21-9.
11. thed. Boston: Mosby; 1999. p.524-30.
12. rd ed. Stamford: Appleton & Lance; 1999. p.841-2.
13. th ed. Boston: Jane's and Barlett; 2004. p.1048-65.
14. Hill PD, Aldag JC, Hekel B, Riner G, Bloomfield P. Maternal post partum quality of life questionnaire. J Nurs Meas. 2006;14(3):205-20.
15. th ed. Lomdon: Gillian Fletcher; 2003. p: 653-61.
16. Jansen AJ, Duvekot JJ, Hop WC, Essink-Bot ML, Beckers EA, Karsdorp VH, et al. New insights into fatigue and health-related quality of life after delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86(5):579-40.
17. thed. Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 2002. p.463-8.
18. Alimohamadian M, Shariat M, Mahmoodi M, Ramezanzadeh F. The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate in maternity hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Payesh (Journal of Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research) 2003;2:133-9.
19. nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2005. p.190,592,706,708,590-92.
20. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal re-hospitalization. JAMA 2000;283(18):2411-6.
21. Lyndon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Martin DP. Delivery and self-reported postpartum general health status among primiparous women. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:232-40.
22. Gerber S, Sharp L, O'toole C. Comparison of postpartum quality of life between patients with repeat cesarean delivery and vaginal birth after cesarean. AMJ Obstet Gynecol 2003;189(6):348.
23. Alizadh M, Charandy S, Nikniaz A. Assessment problem health mothers after 6 week postpartum in tabriz city (dissertation). Tabriz (Iran): Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; 2001.
24. Dolatian M, Mazia P, Alavi Majd H, Yazdjerdi M. The relationship between mode of delivery and postpartum depression. J Reprod Inferil 2006;7(3):260-8.
25. Norozi M, Bashardost N, Farmhini M .Assessment of postpartum physico-sexual problems and its related factors. Journal of Kordistan University of Medical Science 2006;8(1):102.
26. Montazeri A, Torkan B, omidvari s. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EDPS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. BMC Ppsychiatry 2007;7(11):1-6.
27. Border N. After the after birth: a critical review of postpartum health relative to method of delivery. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006;51:242-8.
28. st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p.47,449.
29. Clement S. psychychological aspects of caesarean section best practive & Research clinical. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001;15:109-29.
30. Osis MJ, Paduaks, Duarte GA, Souzatr, Faunde SA. The opinion of Brazilian women regarding vaginal labor and cesarean section. In J Gynecol Obstet 2001;75(1):59-66.
31. Schytt E, Lindmark G, waldenstrom u. Physical symptoms after child birth: prevalence and associations with self-rated health. BJOJ 2005; 112:210-217.