Reflections and perspectives on evidence-based health promotion in French environment;Réflexions et perspectives concernant l'evidence-based health promotion dans le contexte français

Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 277-283

  Cambon, L ^a,b   Ridde, V ^c   Alla, F ^b,d  

^a 1 avenue de la forêt ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Efficacy; Evidence; Evidence based health promotion; Health education; Methodology; Practices; Transferability

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FRANCE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHORT SURVEY;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FRANCE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 77955658620     PISSN: 03987620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2010.05.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (28)

1. Cambon L. Quand la démarche qualité devient un enjeu du développement de la promotion de la santé. Sante Publique 2008, 6(20):513-514.
2. Jenicek M. Epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and evidence-based public health. J Epidemiol 1997, 7:187-197.
3. Smith B.J., Kwok C.T., Nutbeam D. WHO Health promotion glossary: new terms. Health Promot Int 2006, 21(4):340-345.
4. Mc Queen D. Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promot Int 2001, 16(3):261-268.
5. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int 2000, 15:259-267.
6. Tang K.C., Ehsani J.P., Mc Queen D.V. Evidence-based health promotion: recollections, reflections, and considerations. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003, 57:841-843.
7. Nutbeam D. Evaluating health promotion: progress, problems and solutions. Health Promot Int 1998, 13:27-44.
8. McQueen D.V. Données probantes et évaluation des programmes en promotion de la santé. Ruptures 2000, 7(1):79-98.
9. O'Neill M. Pourquoi se préoccupe-t-on tant des données probantes en promotion de la santé ?. Soz Praventivmed 2003, 48(5):317-326.
10. Green L.W., Glasgow R.E., Atkins D., Stange K. Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice. Am J Prev Med 2009, 37(6S1):187-191.
11. Organisation mondiale de la Santé Commission des déterminants sociaux de la santé. Combler le fossé en une génération. Résumé analytique du rapport final. Genève: Edition OMS; 2008, 40 p.
12. Anderson L., Brownson R.C., Fullilove M.T. Evidence-based public health policy and practice: promises and limits. Am J Prev Med 2005, 28(5S):226-230.
13. Alla F., Rossignol P. La méthodologie de la recherche clinique. Rev Prat 2008, 58(13):1483-1488.
14. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. Education and debate. BMJ 1996, 312:1215-1218.
15. Victora C.G., Habicht J.P., Bryce J. Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J of Public Health 2004, 94(3):400-405.
16. Wang S., Moss J.R., Hiller J.E. Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int 2006, 21(1):76-83.
17. Roush S. Randomized controlled trials and the flow of information: comment on Cartwright. Philos Stud 2009, 143(1):137-145.
18. In: Hornick RC (Ed). Public health communication. Evidence for behavior change. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum associates; 2002, 435 p.
19. Green L.W., Glasgow R.E. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006, 29(1):126-153.
20. Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, Ziglio E. Evaluation in health promotion. European Series no. 92. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications; 2001, p. 7-38.
21. Guichard A, Ridde V. Étude exploratoire des mécanismes de l'efficacité des interventions visant à réduire les inégalités sociales de santé. Étude pilote dans trois régions françaises. Rapport final. Inpes université de Santé Internationale de Montréal. CHUM 2009, 48 p.
22. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Handbook of research on teaching 1963, 171-246. Rand McNally, Chicago. N.L. Gage (Ed.).
23. Glasgow R.E., Klesges L.M., Dzewaltowski D.A., et al. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?. Ann Behav Med 2004, 27(1):3-12.
24. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage 1997.
25. Potvin L., Ridde V., Mantoura P. Évaluer l'équité en promotion de la santé. Les inégalités sociales de santé au Québec 2008, 355-378. Les presses de l'université de Montréal, Montréal. K. Frohlich, M. De Koninck, P. Bernard, L. Demers (Eds.).
26. Bunde-Birouste A, Bagnall A, Lobeck K. L'efficacité de la promotion de la santé. Agir sur la santé publique dans une nouvelle Europe. Partie deux. Données probantes, UIPES, 2006, 190 p.
27. McQueen DV, Jones CM, (editors). Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007, 428 p.
28. Speller V., Wimbush E., Morgan A. Evidence-based health promotion practice: how it work. Promot Educ 2005, 12(15):15-20.