Causes of breakage and disruption in a homogeniser

Applied Energy

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3680-3690

  Clarke, A ^a   Prescott, T ^a   Khan, A ^a   Olabi, A G ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Bio Gas; Cell rupture; Fluid dynamics; Homogeniser; Renewable energy; Unicellular organisms

Indexed keywords

ENERGY RESOURCES; FLUID DYNAMICS; TECHNOLOGY;

CELL RUPTURE; HIGH PRESSURE HOMOGENISER; HOMOGENISER; MOST LIKELY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; UNICELLULAR ORGANISMS;

MICROORGANISMS;

BIOFUEL; BIOGAS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM; MICROORGANISM; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EID: 77955653920     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brookman J.S.G. Mechanism of cell disintegration in a high-pressure homogeniser. Biotechnol Bioeng 1974, 17:371-383.
2. Brookman J.S.G. Further studies on the mechanism of cell disruption by extreme pressure extrusion. Biotechnol Bioeng 1975, 17:465-479.
3. Robinson C., Engler C. Disruption of Candida utilis cells in high pressure flow devices. Biotechnol Bioeng 1981, 23:765-780.
4. Hammond M.S., Brookman T.H., Doulah J.S.G. A hydrodynamic mechanism for the disintegration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in an industrial homogeniser. Biotechnol Bioeng 1975, 17:845-858.
5. Floury J., et al. Analysis of a new type of high-pressure of homogeniser Part B. Study of droplet break-up and recoalesence phenomena. Chem Eng Sci 2004, 59:1285-1294.
6. Save S.S., et al. Use of hydrodynamic cavitation for cell disruption. Chem Eng Res Des 1994, 55(B67).
7. Phipps L.W. J Dairy Res 1974, 41:1-7.
8. Titchner-Hooker N., Ayazi Shamlou P., Siddiqi S. Simulation of particle size disruption changes occurring during high-pressure disruption of baker's yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 1996, 50:145-150.
9. Miller J., et al. Using a CFD model to understand the fluid dynamics promoting E. Coli breakage in a high-pressure homogeniser. Biotechnol Prog 2002, 18:1060-1067.
10. Muske W., Kelly K. Optimal operation of high-pressure homogenisation for intracellular product recovery. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2004, 27:25-37.
11. Floury J., et al. A study of the flow pattern. Chem Eng Sci 2002, 59:843-853.
12. Diels A., et al. High pressure homogenisation as a non-thermal technique for the inactivation of micro-organisms. Crit Rev Microbiol 2006, 32(4):201-216.
13. Lothe I.Z.S., Pandit R.R., Shirgaonkar A.B. Comments on the mechanism of microbial cell disruption in high-pressure and high-speed devices. Biotechnol Prog 1998, 14:657-660.
14. S.T.L. Harrison, A.B. Pandit, The disruption of microbial cells by hydrodynamic cavitation, 9th International Biotechnology Symposium, Washington, DC, 1992.
15. Keshavarz-Moore E., et al. Disruption of baker's yeast in a high-pressure homogeniser: new evidence on mechanism. Enzyme Microb Technol 1990, 12:764-770.
16. Smoulders P, Walstra P. Emulsion formation. In: Binks B, editor. Modern aspects of emulsion science; 1998. p. 56-98.
17. Kelly W et al. Model-based control of a high pressure homogeniser. In: Proceedings of the American control conference anchorage, AK, USA; May 2002.
18. Phipps L.W. The fragmentation of oil drops in emulsions by a high-pressure homogeniser. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1975, 8.
19. Lenihan S. University College Cork Webpage Archives; 2004. http://www.ucc.ie/en/DepartmentsCentresandUnits/AMTIreland/Projects/HighPressureProcessing/.
20. Middleberg A.R., Kleinig A.P.J. The correlation of cell disruption with homogeniser valve pressure gradient determined by computational fluid dynamics. Chem Eng Sci 1996, 51(23).
21. Brennen CE. Cavitation and bubble dynamics; 1995. http://caltechbook.library.caltech.edu/1/5/BUBBOOK.pdf.
22. Balasundaram B., Harrison S.T.L. Disruption of Brewers' yeast by hydrodynamic cavitation: process variables and their influence on selective release. Biotech Bioeng 2006, 94(2).
23. Kano T., Kondo E. Int J Radiat Biol 1988, 54(3):475-486.
24. Harrison S.T.L., Balasundaram B. Study of physical, biological factors involved in the disruption of E. coli by hydrodynamic cavitation. Biotechnol Prog 2008, 22(3):907-913.
25. Siddiqi P., Titchner-Hooker S.F., Ayazi Shamlou N.J. A physical model of high-pressure disruption of Baker's yeast cells. Chem Eng Sci 1995, 50(9):1383-1391.
26. Shepherd C.E., Lapple C.B. Calculation of particle trajectories. Ind Eng Chem 1940, 605-617.
27. Perry R.H., Green D.W. Perry's chemical engineers' handbook 1997, McGraw-Hill. 7th ed.
28. John Shaw. NRC wear materials expertise supports MicroSludge(TM) system commercialization; Juin 2009. http://ifci-iipc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/media/success03-microsludge_e.html.
29. Carlos Echavarri-Erasun. Microlibrary.org.; 2005. http://www.microbelibrary.org/ASMOnly/details.asp?id=1971&Lang=