Human behavior integration improves classification rates in real-time BCI

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 362-368

  Grychtol, Bartomiej ^a   Lakany, Heba ^a   Valsan, Gopal ^a   Conway, B A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface (BCI); feedback; human in the loop; motivation; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR INTEGRATION; CLASSIFICATION RATES; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP; KEY FACTORS; MOBILITY AIDS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); MOTIVATION; SENSORY AIDS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WHEELCHAIR;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 77955650066     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2053218     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J. R.Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D. J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, and T. M. Vaughan, "Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol.113, no.6, pp. 767-791, Jun. 2002.
2. M. Van Gerven, J. Farquhar, R. Schaefer, R. Vlek, J. Geuze, A. Nijholt, N. Ramsey, P. Haselager, L. Vuurpijl, S. Gielen, and P. Desain, "The brain-computer interface cycle," J. Neural Eng., vol.6, no.4, p. 041001, 2009.
3. M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, T. Kühme, and U. E. Malinowski, Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, 1993.
4. C. Stephanidis, "Towards user interfaces for all: Some critical issues," in Proc. HCI Int.'95, Panel Session User Interfaces for All-Everybody, Everywhere, and Anytime, Tokyo, Japan, 1995, pp. 137-142.
5. D. Marr, "A theory of cerebellar cortex," J. Physiol., vol.202, no.2, pp. 437-470, 1969.
6. M. Kawato, Feedback Error Learning Neural Network for Supervised Learning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier (North-Holland), 1990, pp. 365-372
7. D. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. Jordan, "An internal model for sensorimotor integration," Science, vol.269, no.5232, pp. 1880-1882, 1995.
8. D. O. Hebb, The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley, 1949.
9. D. Rumelhart, G. Hinton, and R. Williams, "Learning representation by back propagating errors," Nature, vol.323, pp. 533-536, 1986.
10. S. T. Grafton, P. Schmitt, J. V. Horn, and J. Diedrichsen, "Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction," NeuroImage, vol.39, no.3, pp. 1383-1395, 2008.
11. J. Patton and F. Mussa-Ivaldi, "Robot-assisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol.51, no.4, pp. 636-646, Apr. 2004.
12. Y. Matsuoka, B. Brewer, and R. Klatzky, "Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol.4, no.1, p. 17, 2007.
13. Y.Wei, P. Bajaj, R. Scheidt, and J. Patton, "Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning," in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot. (ICORR 2005), 2005, pp. 505-510.
14. O. Donchin, J. T. Francis, and R. Shadmehr, "Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: Theory and experiments in human motor control," J. Neurosci., vol.23, no.27, pp. 9032-9045, 2003.
15. G.Valsan, B. Grychtol, H. Lakany, and B. A. Conway, "The strathclyde brain computer interface," in Proc. 1st Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2009, pp. 606-609.
16. J. Wang and S. Balakirsky, USARSim Manual V3.1.1 2007 [Online]. Available: http://sourceforge.net/projects/usarsim
17. D. Friedmann, R. Leeb, C. Keinrath, C. Guger, M. Garau, G. Pfurtscheller, and M. Slater, "Navigating virtual reality by thought: First steps," in Proc. 7th Annu. Int. Workshop Presence, Valencia, Spain, Oct. 2004, pp. 160-167.
18. R. Leeb, F. Lee, C. Keinrath, R. Scherer, H. Bischof, and G. Pfurtscheller, "Brain-computer communication: Motivation, aim, and impact of exploring a virtual apartment," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol.15, no.4, pp. 473-482, Dec. 2007.
19. R. Ron-Angevin and A. Díaz-Estrella, "Brain-computer interface: Changes in performance using virtual reality techniques," Neurosci. Lett., vol.449, no.2, pp. 123-127, 2009.
20. G. Valsan, "Brain-computer interfaces using detection of ,movement intention," Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Strathclyde, Glasgow, U.K., 2007.
21. G. Morey-Klapsing, A. Arampatzis, and G. P. Brüggemann, "Choosing EMG parameters: Comparison of different onset determination algorithms and EMG integrals in a joint stability study," Clin. Biomechan., vol.19, no.2, pp. 196-201, 2004.
22. L. Vaisman, J. Zariffa, and M. R. Popovic, "Application of singular spectrum-based change-point analysis to EMG-onset detection," J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 2010, to be published.
23. P. Ferrez and J. del R. Millán, "Error-related EEG potentials generated during simulated brain-computer interaction," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol.55, no.3, pp. 923-929, Mar. 2008.
24. G. Schalk, J. R.Wolpaw, D. J. McFarland, and G. Pfurtscheller, "EEGbased communication: Presence of an error potential," Clin. Neurophysiol., vol.111, no.12, pp. 2138-2144, 2000.