Developing and assessing stimulus control based on establishing operations during mand training using representative objects

Behavioral Interventions

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-182

  Gutierrez, Anibal ^a   Vollmer, Timothy R ^b   Samaha, Andrew L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955649737     PISSN: 10720847     EISSN: 1099078X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bin.302     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1993). Mands across water: A report on the application of the picture-exchange communication system in Peru. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 123-128.
2. Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994a). The Delaware autistic program. In S. Harris, & J. Handleman (Eds.), Preschool education programs for children with autism (pp. 37-54). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
3. Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994b). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1-19.
4. Gutierrez, A., Jr., Vollmer, T. R., Dozier, C. L., Borrero, J. C., Rapp, J. T., Bourret, J. C., et al. (2007). Manipulating establishing operations to verify and establish stimulus control during mand training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 645-658.
5. Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407-414.
6. Liddle, K. (2001). Implementing the picture exchange communication system (PECS). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 391-395.
7. McIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: Foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195-213.
8. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155.
9. Park, K. (1995). Using objects of reference: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Education, 10, 40-46.
10. Roane, J. E., Vollmer, T. R., Ringdahl, J. E., & Marcus, B. A., (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.
11. Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (1989). Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 226-234.
12. Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (2000). Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 61-78.
13. Schwartz, I. S., Garfinkle, A. N., & Bauer, J. (1998). The picture exchange communication system: Communicative outcomes for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 144-159.
14. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. Evaluating experimental data in psychology. Boston: Authors Cooperative, Inc.
15. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Turnel, R., & Carter, M. (1994). Establishing a repertoire of requesting for a student with severe and multiple disabilities using tangible symbols and naturalistic time delay. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 193-207.