Reversion from L1 - L5 dual to L5 single frequency WAAS in the presence of RF interference

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1110-1126

  Jan, Shau Shiun ^a   Walter, Todd ^b   Enge, Per ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b The Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DUAL FREQUENCY; GRADIENT MODEL; IONOSPHERIC DELAY ESTIMATIONS; IONOSPHERIC DELAYS; RADIO FREQUENCY INTERFERENCE; RF INTERFERENCE; SINGLE-FREQUENCY; WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEMS;

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; IONOSPHERE; TIME DELAY;

IONOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT;

EID: 77955636484     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2010.5545177     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Enge, P. Local area augmentation of the GPS for the precision approach of aircraft. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87, 1 (Jan. 1999).
2. Enge, P., Walter, T., Pullen, S., Kee, C., Chao, Y. C., and Tsai, Y. J. Wide area augmentation of the Global Positioning System. Proceedings of the IEEE, 84, 8 (Aug. 1996).
3. Federal Aviation Administration Navigation and Landing Transition Strategy. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Washington, D.C., Aug. 2002.
4. ICAO, ANNEX 10 Aeronautical Telecommunications, International Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) on GNSS, 2006.
5. Kelly, R. J. and Davis, J. M. Required navigation performance (RNP) for precision approach and landing GNSS application. Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 41, 1 (Spring 1994).
6. Parkinson, B. W. and Spilker, J. J. Global Positioning System: Theory and Application. Washington, D.C.: AIAA Publication, 1996.
7. ICD-GPS-200C, NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interface. Arinc Research Corporation, EI Segundo, CA, Oct. 10, 1993, and subsequent IRNs 1 through 5, Jan. 14, 2003.
8. Misra, P. and Enge, P. Global Positioning System Signal, Measurements, and Performance (2nd ed.). Lincoln, MA: Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2006.
9. RTCA SC-159 Minimum Operational Performance Standard for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. RTCA/DO-229D, Dec. 13, 2006.
10. Cabler, H. and DeCleene, B. LPV: New, improved WAAS instrument approach. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2002, Portland, OR, Sept. 24-27, 2002.
11. Jan, S. S., Walter, T., and Enge, P. Analysis of a three-frequency GPS/WAAS receiver to land an airplane. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2002, Portland, OR, Sept. 24-27, 2002.
12. The Johns Hopkins University GPS risk assessment study. Applied Physics Laboratory, The John Hopkins University, Final Report, Jan. 1999.
13. RTCA SC-159 Assessment of Radio Frequency Interference for L1/L5 Relevant to the GNSS. RTCA Paper 157-02/AC159-896, 2002.
14. John A. Volpe National Transportation Center Vulnerability Assessment of the Transportation Infrastructure Relying on the Global Positioning System. John A. Volpe National Transportation Center, Final Report, Aug. 29, 2001.
15. Walter, T., Enge, P., and Hansen, A. A proposed integrity equation for WAAS MOPS. In Proceedings of ION GPS 1997, Kansas City, MO, Sept. 16-19, 1997.
16. Jan, S. S., Chan, W., Walter, T., and Enge, P. MATLAB simulation toolset for SBAS availability analysis. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT, Sept. 11-14, 2001.
17. Walter, T., Enge, P., and Reddan, P. Modernizing WAAS. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2004, Long Beach, CA, Sept.21-24, 2004.
18. The GPS Research Laboratory web page Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://waas.stanford.edu/.
19. Jan, S. S., Gebre-Egziabher, D., Walter, T., and Enge, P. Worst-case analysis of a 3-frequency receiver to land a general aviation airplane. In Proceedings of ION NTM 2002, San Diego, CA, Jan. 28-30, 2002.
20. Jan, S. S. Analysis of a three-frequency GPS/WAAS receiver to land an airplane. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2002, Portland, OR, Sept. 24-27, 2002.
21. Dai, D. H., Walter, T., Enge, P., and Powell, J. D. Optimal use of ionospheric corrections for wide area augmentation system (WAAS) users. Presented at the IEEE Position Location and Navigation Symposium, Rancho Mirage, CA, Apr. 20-23, 1998.
22. Hegarty, C. J. Analytical derivation of maximum tolerable in-band interference levels for aviation applications of GNSS. Navigation: Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 44, 1 (Spring 1997).
23. Sparks, L., Mannucci, A. J., Altshuler, E., Fries, R., Walter, T., Hansen, A., Blanch, J., and Enge, P. The WAAS ionospheric threat model. Presented at the Beacon Satellite Symposium, Boston, MA, 2001.
24. Walter, T., Hansen, A., Blanch, J., Enge, P., Mannucci, T., Pi, X., Sparks, L., Iijima, B., El-Arini, B., Lejeune, R., Hagen, M., Altshuler, E., Fries, R., and Chu, A. Robust detection of ionospheric irregularities. In Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, Salt Lake City, UT, Sept. 19-22, 2000.
25. Datta-Barua, S., Walter, T., Pullen, S., Luo, M., Blanch, J., and Enge, P. Using WAAS ionospheric data to estimate LAAS short baseline gradients. In Proceedings of ION NTM 2001, San Diego, CA, Jan. 28-30, 2001.
26. Sakai, T. Study on ionosphere. Presented at the 15th Meeting of the SBAS Technical Interoperability Working Group, Kobe, Japan, Mar. 14-16, 2006.
27. Ene, A., Qiu, D., Luo, M., Pullen, S., and Enge, P. A comprehensive ionosphere storm data analysis method to support LAAS threat model development. In Proceedings of ION NTM 2005, San Diego, CA, Jan. 24-26, 2005.
28. Lee, J., Luo, M., Pullen, S., Park, Y. S., Enge, P., and Brenner, M. Position-domain geometry screening to maximize LAAS availability in the presence of ionosphere anomalies. In Proceedings of ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, TX, Sept. 26-29, 2006.
29. Park, Y. S., Zhang, G., Pullen, S., Lee, J., and Enge, P. Data-replay analysis of LAAS safety during ionosphere storms. In Proceedings of ION GNSS 2007, Fort Worth, TX, Sept. 25-28, 2007.