Simulation-based secondary incident filtering method

Journal of Transportation Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 746-754

  Chou, Chih Sheng ^a   Miller Hooks, Elise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Freeway management; Traffic accidents; Traffic delay; Traffic safety

Indexed keywords

COMMONLY USED; COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; FILTERING METHOD; FREEWAY CONGESTION; FREEWAY MANAGEMENT; INCIDENT DATA; MISCLASSIFICATION RATES; NEW YORK STATE; NONRECURRENT CONGESTION; PERCENTAGE POINTS; SIMULATION-BASED; STATIC METHOD; TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS; TRAFFIC DELAYS; TRAFFIC SAFETY; TRAVEL DELAYS;

ACCIDENTS;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ACCIDENT; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; SAFETY; SIMULATION; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT;

NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77955633264     PISSN: 0733947X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000134     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brach A. Multi-disciplinary incident response training project. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the I-95 Corridor Coalition 2008, Orlando, Fla.
2. Chilukuri V, Sun C. The use of dynamic incident progression curve for classifying secondary accidents. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2006, (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
3. Chou CS, Miller-Hooks E, Promisel I. Benefit-cost analysis of freeway service patrol programs: Methodology and case study. Advances in Transportation Studies 2010, B 20:81-96. Section.
4. Haghani A, Iliescu D, Hamedi M, Yong S. Methodology for quantifying the cost effectiveness of freeway service patrols programs-Case study: H.E.L.P. program 2006, I-95 Corridor Coalition, Md.
5. Hirunyanitiwattana W, Mattingly SP. Identifying secondary crash characteristics for the California highway system. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2006, (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6. Lindley JA. Urban freeway congestion: Quantification of the problem and effectiveness of potential solution. ITE J. 1987, 57(1):27-32. ITEJDZ, 0162-8178.
7. May AD. Traffic flow fundamentals 1990, Prentice-Hall, N.J.
8. Miller-Hooks E, Chou CS. Benefits of highway service patrols H.E.L.P. program evaluation: Finding from incident data analysis 2008, I-95 Corridor Coalition, Md.
9. Minnesota Department of Transportation-FIRST program evaluation 2004, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation (MNDOT), Minn.
10. Moore JE, Giuliano G, Cho S. Secondary accident rates on Los Angeles freeways. J. Transp. Eng. 2004, 130(3):280-285. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:3(280).
11. Raub RA. Occurrence of secondary crashes on urban arterial roadways. Transp. Res. Rec. 1997, 1581:53-58. TRREDM, 0361-1981, 10.3141/1581-07.
12. Schrank D, Lomax T. 2007, The 2007 Urban Mobility Rep., Texas Transportation Institute, Tex.
13. Skabardonis A, Varaiya PP, Petty KF. Measuring recurrent and non-recurrent traffic congestion. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2003, (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
14. Zhan C, Shen L, Hadi M, Gan A. Understanding the characteristics of secondary crashes on freeways. Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board 2008, (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.