Rapid exploiter-victim coevolution: The race is not always to the swift

American Naturalist

Volumn 176, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 198-211

  Calcagno, Vincent ^a   Dubosclard, Marion ^a   De Mazancourt, Claire ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Arms race; Diversification; Evolutionary keystone predator; Red queen; Timescale separation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MUTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME;

EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; TIME FACTORS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

EID: 77955628999     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/653665     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abrams, P. A. 2000a. Character shifts of prey species that share predators. American Naturalist 156 (suppl.): S45-S61.
2. -. 2000b. The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:79-105.
3. -. 2001. Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter-and intraspecific interactions: an assessment of three methods. Ecology Letters 4:166-175.
4. Abrams, P. A., and T. J. Kawecki. 1999. Adaptive host preference and the dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Theoretical Population Biology 56:307-324.
5. Abrams, P. A., and H. Matsuda. 1997. Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution. Evolutionary Ecology 11:1-20.
6. Best, A., A. White, and M. Boots. 2009. The implications of coevolutionary dynamics to host-parasite interactions. American Naturalist 173:779-791.
7. Brown, J. S., and T. L. Vincent. 1992. Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game. Evolution 46:1269-1283.
8. Champagnat, N., R. Ferrière, and S. Méléard. 2006. Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. Theoretical Population Biology 69:297-321.
9. Chesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:343-366.
10. de Mazancourt, C., and U. Dieckmann. 2004. Trade-off geometries and frequency-dependent selection. American Naturalist 164:765-778.
11. Dercole, F., R. Ferrière, A. Gragnani, and S. Rinaldi. 2006. Coevolution of slow-fast populations: evolutionary sliding, evolutionary pseudo-equilibria and complex Red Queen dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:983-990.
12. Dieckmann, U., P. Marrow, and R. Law. 1995. Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the Red Queen. Journal of Theoretical Biology 176:91-102.
13. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. American Naturalist 156 (suppl.): S77-S101.
14. Duffy, M. A., and L. Sivars-Becker. 2007. Rapid evolution and ecological host-parasite dynamics. Ecology Letters 10:44-53.
15. Gavrilets, S. 1997. Coevolutionary chase in exploiter-victim systems with polygenic characters. Journal of Theoretical Biology 186:527-534.
16. Hairston, N. G., S. P. Ellner, M. A. Geber, T. Yoshida, and J. A. Fox. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecology Letters 8:1114-1127.
17. Holt, R. D., J. Grover, and D. Tilman. 1994. Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. American Naturalist 144:741-771.
18. Ives, A. R. 1992. Continuous-time models of host-parasitoid interactions. American Naturalist 140:1-29.
19. Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. 2. The handicap principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442.
20. Jansen, V. A. A., and G. S. E. E. Mulder. 1999. Evolving biodiversity. Ecology Letters 2:379-386.
21. Jansen, V. A. A., and R. Vitalis. 2007. The evolution of dispersal in a Levins' type metapopulation model. Evolution 61:2386-2397.
22. Jian, Z., W. D. Wang, and Z. Bo. 2007. Evolutionary dynamics of prey-predator systems with Holling Type II. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 4:221-237.
23. Jones, L. E., and S. P. Ellner. 2007. Effects of rapid prey evolution on predator-prey cycles. Journal of Mathematical Biology 55:541-573.
24. Khibnik, A. I., and A. S. Kondrashov. 1997. Three mechanisms of Red Queen dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264:1049-1056.
25. Kinzig, A. P., S. A. Levin, J. Dushoff, and S. Pacala. 1999. Limiting similarity, species packing, and system stability for hierarchical competition-colonization models. American Naturalist 153:371-383.
26. Kirkpatrick, M., T. Johnson, and N. Barton. 2002. General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics 161:1727-1750.
27. Kopp, M., and S. Gavrilets. 2006. Multilocus genetics and the coevolution of quantitative traits. Evolution 60:1321-1336.
28. Law, R., P. Marrow, and U. Dieckmann. 1997. On evolution under asymmetric competition. Evolutionary Ecology 11:485-501.
29. Levin, S. A., and J. D. Udovic. 1977. Mathematical-model of coevolving populations. American Naturalist 111:657-675.
30. Lewis, S. M., and C. K. Cratsley. 2008. Flash signal evolution, mate choice, and predation in fireflies. Annual Review of Entomology 53:293-321.
31. Lockwood, J. L., R. D. Powell, P. Nott, and S. L. Pimm. 1997. Assembling ecological communities in space and time. Oikos 80:549-553.
32. Loeuille, N., and M. Loreau. 2005. Evolutionary emergence of sizestructured food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:5761-5766.
33. Loeuille, N., M. Loreau, and R. Ferrière. 2002. Consequences ofplantherbivore coevolution on the dynamics and functioning of ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology 217:369-381.
34. Marrow, P., R. Law, and C. Cannings. 1992. The coevolution of predator prey interactions: ESSs and Red Queen dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 250:133-141.
35. Matsuda, H. 1985. Evolutionarily stable strategies for predator switching. Journal of Theoretical Biology 115:351-366.
36. Matsuda, H., P. A. Abrams, and H. Hori. 1993. The effect of adaptive antipredator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators. Oikos 68:549-559.
37. McGill, B. J., and J. S. Brown. 2007. Evolutionary game theory and adaptive dynamics of continuous traits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38:403-435.
38. Meszéna, G., M. Gyllenberg, L. Pásztor, and J. A. J. Metz. 2006. Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theoretical Population Biology 69:68-87.
39. Murdoch, W. W. 1969. Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecological Monographs 39:335-354.
40. Nagylaki, T. 1993. The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134:627-647.
41. Nuismer, S. L., B. J. Ridenhour, and B. P. Oswald. 2007. Antagonistic coevolution mediated by phenotypic differences between quantitative traits. Evolution 61:1823-1834.
42. Otto, S., and S. L. Nuismer. 2004. Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 304:1018-1020.
43. Rothstein, S. I. 1990. A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:481-508.
44. Rueffler, C., T. J. M. Van Dooren, and J. A. J. Metz. 2004. Adaptive walks on changing landscapes: Levins' approach extended. Theoretical Population Biology 65:165-178.
45. Schaffer, W. M., and M. L. Rosenzweig. 1978. Homage to the Red Queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims. Theoretical Population Biology 14:135-157.
46. Scheffer, M., and E. H. van Nes. 2006. Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103:6230-6235.
47. Skalski, G. T., and J. F. Gilliam. 2001. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling Type II model. Ecology 82:3083-3092.
48. Stenseth, N. C., and J. M. Smith. 1984. Coevolution in ecosystems: Red Queen evolution or stasis? Evolution 38:870-880.
49. Tansky, T. 1978. Switching effect in prey-predator system. Journal of Theoretical Biology 70:263-271.
50. Vanderlaan, J. D., and P. Hogeweg. 1995. Predator-prey coevolution: interactions across different timescales. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 259:35-42.
51. van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1:1-30.
52. Weitz, J. S., H. Hartman, and S. A. Levin. 2005. Coevolutionary arms races between bacteria and bacteriophage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:9535-9540.
53. Wilke, C. O. 2003. Does the Red Queen reign in the kingdom of digital organisms? Pages 405-414 in W. Banzhaf, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, J. T. Kim, and J. Ziegler, eds. Advances in artificial life. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference, ECAL 2003. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2801. Springer, Berlin.
54. Yoshida, T., S. P. Ellner, L. E. Jones, B. J. M. Bohannan, R. E. Lenski, and N. G. Hairston. 2009. Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biology 5: e235.
55. Zuk, M., and G. R. Kolluru. 1998. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology 73:415-438.