The interactive computer interview for mania

Bipolar Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 521-527

  Reilly Harrington, Noreen A ^a,b   DeBonis, Daniel ^a   Leon, Andrew C ^c   Sylvia, Louisa ^a,b   Perlis, Roy ^a,b   Lewis, Daniel ^a   Sachs, Gary S ^a,b  

^a Concordant Rater Systems ^*  (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bipolar disorder; Computerized interviews; Rater reliability

Indexed keywords

AMFEBUTAMONE; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; SERTRALINE; VALPROATE SEMISODIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AGGRESSION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BIPOLAR I DISORDER; BIPOLAR II DISORDER; CLIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER INTERVIEW FOR MANIA; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANIA; MOOD; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VIDEOTAPE; YOUNG MANIA RATING SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIPOLAR DISORDER; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955619319     PISSN: 13985647     EISSN: 13995618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00844.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kobak KA, Kane JM, Thase ME, Nierenberg AA. Why do clinical trials fail? The problem of measurement error in clinical trials: time to test new paradigms? J Clin Psychopharmacol 2007, 27:1-5.
2. Robinson DS, Rickels K. Concerns about clinical drug trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2000, 20:593-596.
3. Thase M. How should efficacy be evaluated in randomized clinical trials of treatments for depression? J Clin Psychiatry 1999, 60:23-31.
4. Trivedi MH, Rush J. Does a placebo run-in or a placebo treatment cell affect the efficacy of antidepressant medications? Neuropsychopharmacology 1994, 11:33-43.
5. Quitkin FM, Rabkin JG, Gerald J, Davis J, Klein DF. Validity of clinical trials of antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157:327-337.
6. Brown WA, Dornseif IS, Wernicke JF. Placebo response in depression: a search for predictors. Psychiatry Res 1988, 26:259-264.
7. Quitkin FM. Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician's guide. Am J Psychiatry 1999, 156:829-836.
8. Keck PE, Welge JA, McElroy SL, Arnold LM, Strakowski SM. Placebo effect in randomized, controlled studies of acute bipolar mania and depression. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47:748-755.
9. Keck PE, Welge JA, Strakowski SM, Arnold LM, McElroy SL. Placebo effect in randomized, controlled maintenance studies of patients with bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47:756-761.
10. Schatzberg AF, Kraemer HC. Use of placebo control groups in evaluating efficacy of treatment of unipolar major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47:736-744.
11. Leon AC. Implications of clinical trial design on sample size requirements. Schizophr Bull 2008, 34:664-669.
12. Leon AC, Marzuk PM, Portera L. More reliable outcome measures can reduce sample size requirements. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995, 52:867-871.
13. Perkins D, Wyatt RJ, Bartko JJ. Penny-wise and pound-foolish: the impact of measurement error on sample size requirements in clinical trials. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47:762-766.
14. Calabrese J, Shelton M, Rapport D, Kimmel S. Current state of the art in pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2000, 3:S50.
15. Kobak KA, Feiger AD, Lipsitz JD. Interview quality and signal detection in clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162:628.
16. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978, 133:429-435.
17. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfactions: development of general scale. Eval Program Plann 1979, 2:197-207.
18. Donner A. Sample size requirements for the comparison of two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement. Stat Med 1998, 17:1157-1168.
19. Carr AC, Ghosh A. Response of phobic patients to direct computer assessment. Br J Psychiatry 1983, 142:60-65.
20. Erdman HP, Klein MH, Greist JH. Direct patient computer interviewing. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985, 53:760-773.
21. Lucas RW, Mullin PJ, Luna CBX, McInroy DC. Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illness: a comparison. Brit J Psychiatry 1977, 131:160-167.
22. Rettew DC, Lynch AD, Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY. Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2009, 18:169-184.