Working with digital archives: Photovoice and meta-analysis in the context of HIV & AIDS

Putting People in the Picture: Visual Methodologies for Social Change

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 163-172

  Park, Eun G ^a   Mitchell, Claudia ^a   de Lange, Naydene ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955608152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Baca, M., & Harpring, P. (Eds.), (2006). Categories for the description of works of art. J. Paul Getty Trust College Art Association. Retrieved 28 August 2006 from http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/.
2. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE Publications.
3. Barnett, T., & Whiteside, A. (2002). AIDS in the twenty-first century: Disease and globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. CanCore. (n.d.) http://www.cancore.ca/en/.
5. Cataloguing Cultural Objects: Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images (Draft). Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.vraweb.org/ccoweb//A-Intro&Part1-28Feb05.pdf.
6. Dempsey, L., & Heery, R. (1998). A review of metadata: A survey of current resource description formats. Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/overview/rev_01.htm.
7. Deegan, M., & Tanner, S. (2002). Digital futures: Strategies for the information age. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
8. De Lange, N., Mitchell, C., Moletsane, R., Stuart, J., & Buthelezi, T. (2006). Seeing with the body: Educators' representations of HIV and AIDS. Journal of Education, 38, 44-66.
9. Dillon, M. (2000). Metadata for web resources: How metadata works on the web. In Bicentennial conference on bibliographic control for the new millennium: Confronting the challenges of networked resources and the web. Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Retrieved 7 January 2007 from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/dillon.html.
10. Gateway to Educational Materials. GEM. Retrieved June 2006 from http://www.thegateway.org.
11. Gartner, R. (2003). METS: Metadata encoding and transmission standard. Joint Information Systems Committee. JISC Comms, 20 Nov 2003. Retrieved December 2006 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=techwatch_report_0205.
12. Gill, T. (1998). Metadata and the world wide web. In M. Baca (Ed.), Introduction to metadata: Pathways to digital information, Online Edition, Version 2.1. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/metadata.html.
13. Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (1998). Setting the stage. In M. Baca (Ed.), Introduction to metadata: Pathways to digital information, Online Edition, Version 2.1. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/intrometadata/setting.html.
14. Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1999). Feminist methodology and young people's sexuality. In P. Aggleton, & R. Parker (Eds.), Culture, society and sexuality (pp. 457-472). London: Taylor and Francis.
15. Hughes, L.M. (2004). Digitizing collections: Strategies and issues for the information manager. London: Facet Publishing.
16. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee. (2002). Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Retrieved March 2007 from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf#search=%22ieee%20lom%22.
17. Iliffe, J. (2006). The African AIDS epidemic: A history. Oxford: James Currey. International Visual Methodologies for Social Change Project. (n.d.) http://www.ivmproject.ca/index.php.
18. Kuhn, A. (1995). Family secrets: Acts of memory and imagination. London: Verso.
19. Lagoze, C. & Payette, S. (2000). Metadata: Principles, practices and challenges. In A. R. Kenney & O. Y. Rieger (Eds.), Moving theory into practice: Digital imaging for libraries and archives (pp. 84-100). Mountain View, California: Research Libraries Group.
20. Library of Congress. METS: An overview and tutorial. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/METSOverview.v2.html.
21. Library of Congress. MODS: Metadata object description schema. Retrieved January 2007 from http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods//.
22. Lucas, M. (2000). Demystifying metadata, Mappa-Mundi. Retrieved January 2007 from http://mappa.mundi.net/trip-m/metadata/.
23. McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(9), 21-32. Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.itdl.org/journal/sep_04/article02.htm.
24. Mitchell, C., De Lange, N., Moletsane, R., Stuart, J., & Buthelezi, T. (2005). Giving a face to HIV and AIDS: On the uses of photovoice by teachers and community health care workers working with youth in rural South Africa. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 257-270.
25. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to interpreting visual objects. London: SAGE Publications.
26. Sekula, A. (1989). The archive and the body. In R. Bolton (Ed.), The contest of meaning (pp. 339-356). Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
27. Visual Resources Association Data Standards Committee. (n.d.). Visual Resources Association Core Categories, Version 3.0. Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm.