Multispecies weed competition and their economic threshold on the wheat crop;Interfereência e Niìvel de Dano Econoômico de Vaárias Espeécies Infestantes na Cultura de Trigo

Planta Daninha

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 239-246

  Gherekhloo, J ^a   Noroozi, S ^b   Mazaheri, D ^b   Ghanbari, A ^c   Ghannadha, M R ^d   Vidal, R A ^d   de Prado, R ^e  

^a GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^c FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Competition; Grain yield; Mathematical regression; Weed interference

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955593358     PISSN: 01008358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582010000200002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BALYAN, R. S. et al. Competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars with wild oat (Avena ludoviciana). Leed Sci., v. 39, n. 2, p. 154-158, 1991.
2. BAZIRAMAKENGA, R.; LEROUX, G. D. Economic and interference threshold densities of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Leed Sci., v. 46, n. 2, p. 176-180, 1998.
3. BHASKAR, A.; VYAS, K. G. Studies on competition between wheat and Chenopodium album L. Weed Res., v. 26, n. 1, p. 53-58, 1988.
4. CARDINA, J.; REGNIER, E.; SPARROW, D. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic threshold in conventional-and no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci., v. 43, n. 1, p. 81-87, 1995.
5. CARLSON, H. L.; HILL, E. Wild oat competition with spring wheat: Plant density effects. Weed Sci., v. 33, n. 2, p. 178-181, 1985.
6. COUSENS, R. Theory and reality of weed control thresholds. lant Protect. Quart., v. 2, n. 1, p. 13-20, 1987.
7. FLECK, N. G. Interferência de papuã (Brachiaria plantaginea) com soja e ganho de produtividade obtido através do seu controle. Pesq. Agropec. Gaúcha, v. 2, n. 1, p. 63-68, 1996.
8. FLECK, N. G.; RIZZARDI, M. A.; AGOSTINETTO, D. Nível do dano econômico como critério para tomada de decisão no controle de guanxuma em soja. Planta Daninha, v. 20, n. 3, p. 421-429, 2002.
9. GALON, L. et al. Níveis de dano econômico para decisão de controle de capim-arroz (Echinochloa spp.) em arroz irrigado(Oryza sativa). Planta Daninha, v. 25, n. 4, p. 709-718, 2007.
10. HASHEM, A.; RADOSEVICH, S. R.; ROUSH, M. L. Effect of proximity factors on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci., v. 46, n. 2, p. 181-190, 1998.
11. MARTIN, R. J.; FIELD, R. J. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res., v. 28, n. 2, p. 111-116, 1988.
12. MORISHITA, D. W.; THILL, D. C. Factors of wild oat interference on spring barley growth and yield. Weed Sci., v. 36, n. 1, p. 37-42, 1988.
13. O'DONOVAN, J. T. Quack grass (Elytrigia repens) interference in Canola (Brassica compestris). Weed Sci., v. 39, n. 3, p. 397-401, 1991.
14. O'DONOVAN, J. T.; BLACKSHAW, R. E. Effect of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) interference on field pea (Pisum sativum L.) yield and profitability. Weed Sci., v. 42, n. 2, p. 249-255, 1997.
15. OLIVER, L. R. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol., v. 2, n. 4, p. 398-403, 1988.
16. PESTER, T. A. et al. Secale cereale interference and economic thresholds in winter Triticum aestivum. Weed Sci., v. 48, n. 6, p. 720-727, 2000.
17. RIZZARDI, M. A.; FLECK, N. G.; AGOSTINETTO, D. Nível de dano econômico como critério para controle de picão-preto em soja. Planta Daninha, v. 21, n. 2, p. 273-282, 2003.
18. RIZZARDI, M. A. et al. Interferência de populações de Euphorbia heterophylla e Ipomoea ramosissima isoladas ou em misturas sobre a cultura da soja. Planta Daninha, v. 22, n. 1, p. 29-34, 2004.
19. SWINTON, S. M. et al. Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci., v. 42, n. 1, p. 103-109, 1994.
20. TREZZI, M. M. et al. Multiple resistance to acetolactate synthase and protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors in Euphorbia heterophylla biotypes. J. Environ. Sci. Health., v. 40, n. 1, p. 101-109, 2005.
21. VANGESSEL, M. J. et al. Influence of weed density and distribution on corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Sci., v. 43, n. 2, p. 215-218, 1995.
22. VIDAL, R. A. et al. Nível de dano econômico de Brachiaria plantaginea na cultura de milho irrigado. Planta Daninha, v. 22, n. 1, p. 63-69, 2004.
23. VIDAL, R. A. et al. Glyphosate resistant biotypes of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla (L.)) and its risk analysis on glyphosate-tolerant soybeans. J. Food Agric. Environ., v. 5, n. 2, p. 265-269, 2007.
24. WEAVER, S. E.; IVANY, J. A. Economic threshold for wild radish, wild oat, hemp nettle, and corn spurry in spring barley. Canadian J. Plant Sci., v. 78, n. 2, p. 357-361, 1998.