Improving recruitment and retention rates in preventive longitudinal research with adolescent mother

Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 150-153

  Seed, Mary ^a   Juarez, Magdalena ^a   Alnatour, Ranya ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Longitudinal study; Nursing; Patient selection; Research

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; EDUCATION; EMOTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MOBILE PHONE; MOTHER; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONNEL; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY; CELLULAR PHONE; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; EXPRESSED EMOTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; MOTHERS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN ADOLESCENCE; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 77955578030     PISSN: 10736077     EISSN: 17446171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2009.00193.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Boys, A., Marsden, J., Stillwell, G., Hatchings, K., Griffiths, P., & Farrell, M. (2003). Minimizing respondent attrition in longitudinal research: Practical implications from a cohort study of adolescent drinking. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 363-373.
2. Cotter, R.B., Burke, J.D., Loeber, R., & Navratil, J.L. (2002). Innovative retention methods in longitudinal research: A case study of the developmental trends study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(4), 485-498.
3. Faden, V.B., Day, N.L., Windle, M., Windle, R., Grube, J.W., Molina, B.S., et al. (2004). Collecting longitudinal data through childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood: Methodological challenges. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28(2), 330-340.
4. Gregory, M.M., Lohr, M.L., & Gilchrist, L.D. (1992). Methods for tracking pregnant and parenting adolescents. Evaluation Review, 17(1), 69-81.
5. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Retrieved December 26, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf
6. McLellan, A.T., Woody, G.E., Metzger, D., McKay, J., Durrell, J., Alterman, A.I., et al. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments: Reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. In J.A. Egertson, D.M., Fox, & A.I., Leshner (Eds.), Treating drug abusers effectively. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
7. Mills, C.A., Pederson, L.L., Koval, J.J., Gushue, S.M., & Aubut, J.L. (2000). Longitudinal tracking and retention in a school-based study on adolescent smoking: Costs variables and smoking status. Journal of School Health, 70(3), 107-112.
8. Navratil, J.L., Green, S.M., Loeber, R., & Lahey, B.B. (1994). Minimizing subject loss in a longitudinal study of deviant behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3(1), 89-106.
9. Prinz, R.J., Smith, E.P., Dumas, J.E., Laughlin, J.E., White, D.W., & Barron, R. (2001). Recruitment and retention rates of participants in prevention trials involving family based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 31-37.