Clinicians can accurately assign apgar scores to video recordings of simulated neonatal resuscitations

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 204-212

  Nadler, Izhak ^a   Liley, Helen G ^b   Sanderson, Penelope M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Mater Mother's Hospital   (Australia)

Author keywords

Apgar; Judgment; Neonatal resuscitation; Policy; Recording; Scenario; Simulator; Video

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PRENATAL CARE; RESUSCITATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; VIDEORECORDING;

APGAR SCORE; AUSTRALIA; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LINEAR MODELS; MANIKINS; PRENATAL CARE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77955566337     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181dcfb22     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953;32:260-267.
2. Papile LA. The Apgar score in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2001;344: 519-520.
3. The Apgar score. Pediatrics 2006;117:1444-1447.
4. Pinheiro JMB. The Apgar cycle: a new view of a familiar scoring system. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F70-F72.
5. Assar D, Chamberlain D, Colquhoun M, et al. Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support 1. Skill acquisition at bronze stage. Resuscitation 2000;45:7-15.
6. Takiguchi S, Sekimoto M, Yasui M, et al. Cyber visual training as a new method for the mastery of endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:1204-1210.
7. Carbine DN, Finer NN, Knodel E, Rich W. Video Recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance. Pediatrics 2000;106:654-658.
8. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Heniford BT, Scott DJ. Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2007;142:202-206.
9. Weinger MB, Gonzales DC, Slagle J, Syeed M. Video capture of clinical care to enhance patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13: 136-144.
10. Scherer LA, Chang MC, Meredith JW, Battistella FD. Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning. Am J Surg 2003;185:516-520.
11. O'Donnell CPF, Kamlin COF, Davis PG, Carlin JB, Morley CJ. Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score. J Pediatr 2006;149:486-489.
12. Devitt JH. Testing the raters: inter-rater reliability of standardized anaesthesia simulator performance. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:924-928.
13. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D. Evaluation of medical student's performance using the anaesthesia simulator. Med Educ 2000;34:42-45.
14. Brunswik E. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. 2nd ed. Berekeley, CA: University of California; 1956.
15. Cooksey RW. Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996.
16. Brunswik E. The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1952.
17. Hammond KR, Stewart TR. Introduction. In: Hammond KR, Stewart TR, eds. The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001:540.
18. Kirlik A. Brunswikian resources for event-perception research. Perception 2009;38:376-398.
19. Kirlik A. Adaptive Perspective on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
20. Hammond KR, Stewart TR. The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
21. Wigton RS. What do the theories of Egon Brunswik have to say to medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:109-121.
22. Holzworth RJ. Judgment analysis. In: Hammond KR, Stewart TR, eds. The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001:324-327.
23. Tucker LR. A suggested alternative formulation in the developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd. Psychol Rev 1964;71:528-530.
24. Hursch CJ, Hammond KR, Hursch JL. Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue-probability studies. Psychol Rev 1964; 71:42-60.
25. Karelaia N, Hogarth RM. Determinants of linear judgment: A metaanalysis of lens model studies. Psychol Bull 2008;134:404-426.
26. Wigton RS, Darr CA, Corbett KK, Nickol DR, Gonzales R. How do community practitioners decide whether to prescribe antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections? J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1615-1620.
27. Beckstead JW, Stamp KD. Understanding how nurse practitioners estimate patient's risk for coronary heart disease: a judgment analysis. 2007;60:436-446.
28. Thompson C, Bucknall T, Estabrookes CA, et al. Nurse's critical event risk assessments: a judgement analysis. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:601-612.
29. Kattwinkel J, Short J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2006.
30. Guise JM, Deering SH, Kanki BG, et al. Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork. empirical investigations. Simul Healthc 2008;3:217-233.